Literature DB >> 22937175

Diffuse optical spectroscopy evaluation of treatment response in women with locally advanced breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Omar Falou1, Hany Soliman, Ali Sadeghi-Naini, Sara Iradji, Sharon Lemon-Wong, Judit Zubovits, Jacqueline Spayne, Rebecca Dent, Maureen Trudeau, Jean Francois Boileau, Frances C Wright, Martin J Yaffe, Gregory J Czarnota.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of diffuse optical spectroscopy for monitoring of patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Fifteen women receiving treatment for LABC had the affected breast scanned before; 1 week, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after treatment initiation; and before surgery. Optical properties related to tissue microstructure and biochemical composition were obtained. Clinical and pathologic tumor response was evaluated using whole-mount pathology after mastectomy. Patients who responded to treatment demonstrated an initial increase followed by a drop in optical parameters measured in the whole breast, whereas nonresponding patients demonstrated only a drop in the same parameters 1 week after treatment initiation. Responding patients demonstrated a significant increase of 17% ± 7%, 8% ± 8%, 10% ± 7%, 11% ± 11%, and 16% ± 15% in deoxygenated hemoglobin, oxygenated hemoglobin, total hemoglobin concentrations, water percentage, and tissue optical index, 1 week after treatment initiation, respectively. In contrast, nonresponding patients had a decrease of 14% ± 9%, 18% ± 7%, 17% ± 7%, 29% ± 7%, and 32% ± 9% in their corresponding optical parameters. Deoxygenated hemoglobin concentration (with 100% sensitivity, 83% specificity) and water percentage (with 75% sensitivity, 100% specificity) were found to be the best predictors of treatment response at 1 week after starting treatment. The results of this study suggest that optical parameters can be potentially used to predict and monitor patients' responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and can form a basis for the customization of treatments in which inefficacious treatments can be switched to more efficacious therapies.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22937175      PMCID: PMC3431033          DOI: 10.1593/tlo.11346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Oncol        ISSN: 1936-5233            Impact factor:   4.243


  28 in total

Review 1.  Non-invasive in vivo characterization of breast tumors using photon migration spectroscopy.

Authors:  B J Tromberg; N Shah; R Lanning; A Cerussi; J Espinoza; T Pham; L Svaasand; J Butler
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2000 Jan-Apr       Impact factor: 5.715

2.  Diffuse optical tomography of breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a case study with comparison to MRI.

Authors:  Regine Choe; Alper Corlu; Kijoon Lee; Turgut Durduran; Soren D Konecky; Monika Grosicka-Koptyra; Simon R Arridge; Brian J Czerniecki; Douglas L Fraker; Angela DeMichele; Britton Chance; Mark A Rosen; Arjun G Yodh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: evidence for improved preoperative staging.

Authors:  L Esserman; N Hylton; L Yassa; J Barclay; S Frankel; E Sickles
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Prospective comparison of mammography, sonography, and MRI in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for palpable breast cancer.

Authors:  Eren Yeh; Priscilla Slanetz; Daniel B Kopans; Elizabeth Rafferty; Dianne Georgian-Smith; Linda Moy; Elkan Halpern; Richard Moore; Irene Kuter; Alphonse Taghian
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Accuracy of MR imaging for revealing residual breast cancer in patients who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Savannah C Partridge; Jessica E Gibbs; Ying Lu; Laura J Esserman; Dan Sudilovsky; Nola M Hylton
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 6.  Final results of a randomized phase III trial comparing cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil with a dose-intensified epirubicin and cyclophosphamide + filgrastim as neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced breast cancer: an EORTC-NCIC-SAKK multicenter study.

Authors:  P Therasse; L Mauriac; M Welnicka-Jaskiewicz; P Bruning; T Cufer; H Bonnefoi; E Tomiak; K I Pritchard; A Hamilton; M J Piccart
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Diffuse optical monitoring of blood flow and oxygenation in human breast cancer during early stages of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Chao Zhou; Regine Choe; Natasha Shah; Turgut Durduran; Guoqiang Yu; Amanda Durkin; David Hsiang; Rita Mehta; John Butler; Albert Cerussi; Bruce J Tromberg; Arjun G Yodh
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.170

8.  Monitoring neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer using quantitative diffuse optical spectroscopy: a case study.

Authors:  Dorota B Jakubowski; Albert E Cerussi; Frédéric Bevilacqua; Natasha Shah; David Hsiang; John Butler; Bruce J Tromberg
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.170

9.  Predicting response to breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy using diffuse optical spectroscopy.

Authors:  Albert Cerussi; David Hsiang; Natasha Shah; Rita Mehta; Amanda Durkin; John Butler; Bruce J Tromberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Imaging in breast cancer: diffuse optics in breast cancer: detecting tumors in pre-menopausal women and monitoring neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Bruce J Tromberg; Albert Cerussi; Natasha Shah; Montana Compton; Amanda Durkin; David Hsiang; John Butler; Rita Mehta
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  28 in total

1.  Longitudinal optical monitoring of blood flow in breast tumors during neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  J M Cochran; S H Chung; A Leproux; W B Baker; D R Busch; A M DeMichele; J Tchou; B J Tromberg; A G Yodh
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Wearable near-infrared optical probe for continuous monitoring during breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy infusions.

Authors:  Fei Teng; Timothy Cormier; Alexis Sauer-Budge; Rachita Chaudhury; Vivian Pera; Raeef Istfan; David Chargin; Samuel Brookfield; Naomi Yu Ko; Darren M Roblyer
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Normalization of compression-induced hemodynamics in patients responding to neoadjuvant chemotherapy monitored by dynamic tomographic optical breast imaging (DTOBI).

Authors:  Amir Y Sajjadi; Steven J Isakoff; Bin Deng; Bhawana Singh; Christy M Wanyo; Qianqian Fang; Michelle C Specht; Lidia Schapira; Beverly Moy; Aditya Bardia; David A Boas; Stefan A Carp
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Optical Mammography in Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Individual Clinical Response Index.

Authors:  Pamela G Anderson; Sirishma Kalli; Angelo Sassaroli; Nishanth Krishnamurthy; Shital S Makim; Roger A Graham; Sergio Fantini
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Dynamic Diffuse Optical Tomography for Monitoring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jacqueline E Gunther; Emerson A Lim; Hyun K Kim; Molly Flexman; Mirella Altoé; Jessica A Campbell; Hanina Hibshoosh; Katherine D Crew; Kevin Kalinsky; Dawn L Hershman; Andreas H Hielscher
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in women with locally advanced breast cancer using ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  Omar Falou; Ali Sadeghi-Naini; Sameera Prematilake; Ervis Sofroni; Naum Papanicolau; Sara Iradji; Zahra Jahedmotlagh; Sharon Lemon-Wong; Jean-Philippe Pignol; Eileen Rakovitch; Judit Zubovits; Jacqueline Spayne; Rebecca Dent; Maureen Trudeau; Jean Francois Boileau; Frances C Wright; Martin J Yaffe; Gregory J Czarnota
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

7.  Ultrasound-Guided Diffuse Optical Tomography for Predicting and Monitoring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Breast Cancers: Recent Progress.

Authors:  Chen Xu; Hamed Vavadi; Alex Merkulov; Hai Li; Mohsen Erfanzadeh; Atahar Mostafa; Yanping Gong; Hassan Salehi; Susan Tannenbaum; Quing Zhu
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 1.578

8.  Predicting Responses to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: ACRIN 6691 Trial of Diffuse Optical Spectroscopic Imaging.

Authors:  Bruce J Tromberg; Zheng Zhang; Anaïs Leproux; Thomas D O'Sullivan; Albert E Cerussi; Philip M Carpenter; Rita S Mehta; Darren Roblyer; Wei Yang; Keith D Paulsen; Brian W Pogue; Shudong Jiang; Peter A Kaufman; Arjun G Yodh; So Hyun Chung; Mitchell Schnall; Bradley S Snyder; Nola Hylton; David A Boas; Stefan A Carp; Steven J Isakoff; David Mankoff
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Differentiation of tumor vasculature heterogeneity levels in small animals based on total hemoglobin concentration using magnetic resonance-guided diffuse optical tomography in vivo.

Authors:  Tiffany C Kwong; Mitchell Hsing; Yuting Lin; David Thayer; Mehmet Burcin Unlu; Min-Ying Su; Gultekin Gulsen
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 1.980

10.  Conventional frequency ultrasonic biomarkers of cancer treatment response in vivo.

Authors:  Ali Sadeghi-Naini; Omar Falou; Hadi Tadayyon; Azza Al-Mahrouki; William Tran; Naum Papanicolau; Michael C Kolios; Gregory J Czarnota
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 4.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.