Literature DB >> 27527559

Predicting Responses to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: ACRIN 6691 Trial of Diffuse Optical Spectroscopic Imaging.

Bruce J Tromberg1, Zheng Zhang2, Anaïs Leproux3, Thomas D O'Sullivan3, Albert E Cerussi3, Philip M Carpenter4, Rita S Mehta5, Darren Roblyer6, Wei Yang7, Keith D Paulsen8, Brian W Pogue8, Shudong Jiang8, Peter A Kaufman9, Arjun G Yodh10, So Hyun Chung10, Mitchell Schnall11, Bradley S Snyder12, Nola Hylton13, David A Boas14, Stefan A Carp14, Steven J Isakoff15, David Mankoff11.   

Abstract

The prospective multicenter ACRIN 6691 trial was designed to evaluate whether changes from baseline to mid-therapy in a diffuse optical spectroscopic imaging (DOSI)-derived imaging endpoint, the tissue optical index (TOI), predict pathologic complete response (pCR) in women undergoing breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). DOSI instruments were constructed at the University of California, Irvine (Irvine, CA), and delivered to six institutions where 60 subjects with newly diagnosed breast tumors (at least 2 cm in the longest dimension) were enrolled over a 2-year period. Bedside DOSI images of the tissue concentrations of deoxy-hemoglobin (ctHHb), oxy-hemoglobin (ctHbO2), water (ctH2O), lipid, and TOI (ctHHb × ctH2O/lipid) were acquired on both breasts up to four times during NAC treatment: baseline, 1-week, mid-point, and completion. Of the 34 subjects (mean age 48.4 ± 10.7 years) with complete, evaluable data from both normal and tumor-containing breast, 10 (29%) achieved pCR as determined by central pathology review. The percent change in tumor-to-normal TOI ratio (%TOITN) from baseline to mid-therapy ranged from -82% to 321%, with a median of -36%. Using pCR as the reference standard and ROC curve methodology, %TOITN AUC was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.39-0.81). In the cohort of 17 patients with baseline tumor oxygen saturation (%StO2) greater than the 77% population median, %TOITN AUC improved to 0.83 (95% CI, 0.63-1.00). We conclude that the combination of baseline functional properties and dynamic optical response shows promise for clinical outcome prediction. Cancer Res; 76(20); 5933-44. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27527559      PMCID: PMC5148152          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  54 in total

1.  Effects of the menstrual cycle on the red and near-infrared optical properties of the human breast.

Authors:  R Cubeddu; C D'Andrea; A Pifferi; P Taroni; A Torricelli; G Valentini
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.421

2.  Baseline tumor oxygen saturation correlates with a pathologic complete response in breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Shigeto Ueda; Darren Roblyer; Albert Cerussi; Amanda Durkin; Anais Leproux; Ylenia Santoro; Shanshan Xu; Thomas D O'Sullivan; David Hsiang; Rita Mehta; John Butler; Bruce J Tromberg
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Characterization of female breast lesions from multi-wavelength time-resolved optical mammography.

Authors:  Lorenzo Spinelli; Alessandro Torricelli; Antonio Pifferi; Paola Taroni; Gianmaria Danesini; Rinaldo Cubeddu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-05-18       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Preoperative therapy in invasive breast cancer: reviewing the state of the science and exploring new research directions.

Authors:  Julie R Gralow; Jo Anne Zujewski; Eric Winer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Pathologic complete response as a potential surrogate for the clinical outcome in patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: a meta-regression of 29 randomized prospective studies.

Authors:  Alfredo Berruti; Vito Amoroso; Fabio Gallo; Valentina Bertaglia; Edda Simoncini; Rebecca Pedersini; Laura Ferrari; Alberto Bottini; Paolo Bruzzi; Maria Pia Sormani
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Monitoring primary breast cancer throughout chemotherapy using FDG-PET.

Authors:  Garry M McDermott; Andrew Welch; Roger T Staff; Fiona J Gilbert; Lutz Schweiger; Scott I K Semple; Tim A D Smith; Andrew W Hutcheon; Iain D Miller; Ian C Smith; Steven D Heys
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Tumor angiogenesis change estimated by using diffuse optical spectroscopic tomography: demonstrated correlation in women undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer?

Authors:  Marius G Pakalniskis; Wendy A Wells; Mary C Schwab; Heather M Froehlich; Shudong Jiang; Zhongze Li; Tor D Tosteson; Steven P Poplack; Peter A Kaufman; Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of locally advanced breast cancer: predicting response with in vivo (1)H MR spectroscopy--a pilot study at 4 T.

Authors:  Sina Meisamy; Patrick J Bolan; Eva H Baker; Robin L Bliss; Evin Gulbahce; Lenore I Everson; Michael T Nelson; Tim H Emory; Todd M Tuttle; Douglas Yee; Michael Garwood
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Noninvasive functional optical spectroscopy of human breast tissue.

Authors:  N Shah; A Cerussi; C Eker; J Espinoza; J Butler; J Fishkin; R Hornung; B Tromberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  W Fraser Symmans; Florentia Peintinger; Christos Hatzis; Radhika Rajan; Henry Kuerer; Vicente Valero; Lina Assad; Anna Poniecka; Bryan Hennessy; Marjorie Green; Aman U Buzdar; S Eva Singletary; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  37 in total

1.  Emerging Breast Imaging Technologies on the Horizon.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 1.875

2.  Longitudinal optical monitoring of blood flow in breast tumors during neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  J M Cochran; S H Chung; A Leproux; W B Baker; D R Busch; A M DeMichele; J Tchou; B J Tromberg; A G Yodh
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Quantitative real-time pulse oximetry with ultrafast frequency-domain diffuse optics and deep neural network processing.

Authors:  Yanyu Zhao; Mattew B Applegate; Raeef Istfan; Ashvin Pande; Darren Roblyer
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Multimodal breast cancer imaging using coregistered dynamic diffuse optical tomography and digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Bernhard B Zimmermann; Bin Deng; Bhawana Singh; Mark Martino; Juliette Selb; Qianqian Fang; Amir Y Sajjadi; Jayne Cormier; Richard H Moore; Daniel B Kopans; David A Boas; Mansi A Saksena; Stefan A Carp
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Non-contact dynamic diffuse optical tomography imaging system for evaluating lower extremity vasculature.

Authors:  J W Hoi; H K Kim; C J Fong; L Zweck; A H Hielscher
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Stable tissue-simulating phantoms with various water and lipid contents for diffuse optical spectroscopy.

Authors:  Etsuko Ohmae; Nobuko Yoshizawa; Kenji Yoshimoto; Maho Hayashi; Hiroko Wada; Tetsuya Mimura; Hiroaki Suzuki; Shu Homma; Norihiro Suzuki; Hiroyuki Ogura; Hatsuko Nasu; Harumi Sakahara; Yutaka Yamashita; Yukio Ueda
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Monitoring Breast Cancer Response to Treatment Using Stokes Shift Spectroscopy of Blood Plasma.

Authors:  Krishnamoorthy Chithra; Prakasarao Aruna; Gnanatheepam Einstein; Srinivasan Vijayaraghavan; Singaravelu Ganesan
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  Impact of errors in experimental parameters on reconstructed breast images using diffuse optical tomography.

Authors:  Bin Deng; Mats Lundqvist; Qianqian Fang; Stefan A Carp
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  Performance assessment of diffuse optical spectroscopic imaging instruments in a 2-year multicenter breast cancer trial

Authors:  Thomas D. O'Sullivan; Albert Cerussi; Amanda Durkin; Brian Hill; Nola Hylton; Arjun G. Yodh; Stefan A. Carp; David Boas; Shudong Jiang; Keith D. Paulsen; Brian Pogue; Darren Roblyer; Wei Yang; Bruce J. Tromberg
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 3.170

10.  Optical Mammography in Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Individual Clinical Response Index.

Authors:  Pamela G Anderson; Sirishma Kalli; Angelo Sassaroli; Nishanth Krishnamurthy; Shital S Makim; Roger A Graham; Sergio Fantini
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.