Literature DB >> 2293349

Errors in radiographic assessment of marginal bone height around osseointegrated implants.

I P Sewerin1.   

Abstract

Radiographic assessment of marginal bone height is included in longitudinal control of osseointegrated implants. Previous studies have revealed a mean annual loss of less than 0.1 mm. The purpose of the present study was by means of an experimental model to analyze the influence upon alveolar bone height measures around osseointegrated implants of buccolingual bone dimensions as well as angulations of fixture axis to central X-ray beam. Brånemark titanium implants were inserted into acrylic test blocks simulating alveolar ridges of various widths. 0.2 mm steel wires visualized buccal and lingual bone margins. Standardized radiographs were obtained by stepwise variation of projection angles. Separation of the wire images varied from 0.1 mm (buccolingual width 5 mm and 1 degree angulation) to 4.8 mm (width 13 mm and angulation 20 degrees). In clinical cases distortion of buccal and lingual bone margins may result in overestimation of bone heights. The degree of overestimation is influenced by the buccolingual position of the fixture. Strict parallelism between fixture axes and film plane is essential to obtain valid results using single films.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2293349     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1990.tb00994.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Dent Res        ISSN: 0029-845X


  9 in total

1.  Pose determination of a cylindrical (dental) implant in three-dimensions from a single two-dimensional radiograph.

Authors:  R K W Schulze
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  A paralleling technique modification to determine the bone crest level around dental implants.

Authors:  Noelia Fernández-Formoso; B Rilo; M J Mora; I Martínez-Silva; U Santana
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  A method for segmentation of dental implants and crestal bone.

Authors:  Pedro Cunha; Miguel A Guevara; Ana Messias; Salomão Rocha; Rita Reis; Pedro M G Nicolau
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Assessing fit at the implant-abutment junction with a radiographic device that does not require access to the implant body.

Authors:  Kevin C Lin; Chandur P K Wadhwani; Jing Cheng; Arun Sharma; Frederick Finzen
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  The comparison of the precision of different dental radiographic methods in mandibular peri-implantary measurements: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Hakan Bilhan; Onur Geckili; Selda Arat Bilhan; Fatih Aycicek; Berkman Albayrak; Pelin Bozbulut; Fatma Unalan
Journal:  J Istanb Univ Fac Dent       Date:  2015-01-31

6.  Three-unit fixed dental prostheses supported by either two abutment implants or two abutment teeth: A comparative retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Christiaan W P Pol; Gerry M Raghoebar; Marco S Cune; Henny J A Meijer
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2022-04-05

Review 7.  Clinical Assessment of Dental Implant Stability During Follow-Up: What Is Actually Measured, and Perspectives.

Authors:  Elisabetta M Zanetti; Giulia Pascoletti; Michele Calì; Cristina Bignardi; Giordano Franceschini
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-13

Review 8.  Using acrylic customized X-ray positioning stents for long-term follow-up studies.

Authors:  Sherif Aly Sadek; Hisham Mohamed Abbas; Moayad Alfelali; Abdulaziz Almahdali
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2019-10-15

9.  Full-zirconia single-tooth molar implant-supported restorations with angulated screw channel abutments: A 1-year prospective case series study.

Authors:  Christiaan W P Pol; Gerry M Raghoebar; Zakelina Maragkou; Marco S Cune; Henny J A Meijer
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.932

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.