Literature DB >> 23212460

A method for segmentation of dental implants and crestal bone.

Pedro Cunha1, Miguel A Guevara, Ana Messias, Salomão Rocha, Rita Reis, Pedro M G Nicolau.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Medical imaging and in particular digital radiographic images offer a great deal of information to dentists in the clinical diagnosis and treatment processes on a daily basis. This paper presents a new method aimed to produce an accurate segmentation of dental implants and the crestal bone line in radiographic images. With this, it is possible computing several measures to biomechanical and clinical evaluation of dental implants positioning and evolution.
METHODS: The proposed segmentation method includes two major steps: (1) the preprocessing that combine denoising filters, morphological operations and histogram threshold techniques and (2) the final segmentation involving made-to-measure adjusted and trained active shape models for detecting the precise location of the intended structures.
RESULTS: Resulting measurements were compared to manual measurements made by experts on representative radiographs from patients. The calculated intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.75 and showed good reliability of the method, and the Bland-Altman analysis showed 95% of the values within the limits of agreement. The mean of the differences between the manual and method-driven measurements was 0.049 mm ([Formula: see text]) 95% CI, inferior to the established limit (0.15mm).
CONCLUSIONS: It was demonstrated that the method achieved a precise segmentation of the intended structures. The validation process on standardized periapical radiographs showed good agreement between the manual measurements and the ones produced by the new method. Future work will be focused on making the method more robust to densitometry changes and to validate the method on non-standardized radiographs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23212460     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-012-0802-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  23 in total

Review 1.  Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  Robust active appearance models and their application to medical image analysis.

Authors:  Reinhard Beichel; Horst Bischof; Franz Leberl; Milan Sonka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  A precise receptor-positioning device for subtraction radiography, based on cross-arch stabilization.

Authors:  R A Couture; D A Dixon; C F Hildebolt
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  A computer-aided oral implantology system.

Authors:  Chen Xiaojun; Wang Chengtao; Lin Yanping
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2005

5.  Snakes, shapes, and gradient vector flow.

Authors:  C Xu; J L Prince
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 10.856

6.  Errors in radiographic assessment of marginal bone height around osseointegrated implants.

Authors:  I P Sewerin
Journal:  Scand J Dent Res       Date:  1990-10

7.  A computational approach to edge detection.

Authors:  J Canny
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 6.226

8.  Validity of radiographic measurement of interproximal bone loss.

Authors:  P Eickholz; T S Kim; D K Benn; H J Staehle
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1998-01

9.  A robust digital method for film contrast correction in subtraction radiography.

Authors:  U E Ruttimann; R L Webber; E Schmidt
Journal:  J Periodontal Res       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.419

10.  Evaluation of the difference in accuracy between implant placement by virtual planning data and surgical guide templates versus the conventional free-hand method - a combined in vivo - in vitro technique using cone-beam CT (Part II).

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Nickenig; Manfred Wichmann; Jörg Hamel; Karl Andreas Schlegel; Stephan Eitner
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 2.078

View more
  2 in total

1.  Impact of ensemble learning in the assessment of skeletal maturity.

Authors:  Pedro Cunha; Daniel C Moura; Miguel Angel Guevara López; Conceição Guerra; Daniela Pinto; Isabel Ramos
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Deep learning-based dental implant recognition using synthetic X-ray images.

Authors:  Aviwe Kohlakala; Johannes Coetzer; Jeroen Bertels; Dirk Vandermeulen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 3.079

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.