Literature DB >> 22930737

Effects of magnetic stray fields from a 7 tesla MRI scanner on neurocognition: a double-blind randomised crossover study.

Lotte E van Nierop1, Pauline Slottje, Martine J E van Zandvoort, Frank de Vocht, Hans Kromhout.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study characterises neurocognitive domains that are affected by movement-induced time-varying magnetic fields (TVMF) within a static magnetic stray field (SMF) of a 7 Tesla (T) MRI scanner.
METHODS: Using a double-blind randomised crossover design, 31 healthy volunteers were tested in a sham (0 T), low (0.5 T) and high (1.0 T) SMF exposure condition. Standardised head movements were made before every neurocognitive task to induce TVMF.
RESULTS: Of the six tested neurocognitive domains, we demonstrated that attention and concentration were negatively affected when exposed to TVMF within an SMF (varying from 5.0% to 21.1% per Tesla exposure, p<0.05), particular in situations were high working memory performance was required. In addition, visuospatial orientation was affected after exposure (46.7% per Tesla exposure, p=0.05).
CONCLUSION: Neurocognitive functioning is modulated when exposed to movement-induced TVMF within an SMF of a 7 T MRI scanner. Domains that were affected include attention/concentration and visuospatial orientation. Further studies are needed to better understand the mechanisms and possible practical safety and health implications of these acute neurocognitive effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22930737     DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2011-100468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  11 in total

Review 1.  Implementation of a comprehensive MR safety course for medical students.

Authors:  Steffen Sammet; Christina L Sammet
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Transient health symptoms of MRI staff working with 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla scanners in the UK.

Authors:  Frank de Vocht; Evridiki Batistatou; Anna Mölter; Hans Kromhout; Kristel Schaap; Martie van Tongeren; Stuart Crozier; Penny Gowland; Stephen Keevil
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  [Problems and chances of high field magnetic resonance imaging].

Authors:  M E Ladd; M Bock
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  10.5 T MRI static field effects on human cognitive, vestibular, and physiological function.

Authors:  Andrea Grant; Gregory J Metzger; Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Gregor Adriany; Cheryl Olman; Lin Zhang; Joseph Koopermeiners; Yiğitcan Eryaman; Margaret Koeritzer; Meredith E Adams; Thomas R Henry; Kamil Uğurbil
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Short-term side-effects of brain MR examination at 7 T: a single-centre experience.

Authors:  M Cosottini; D Frosini; L Biagi; I Pesaresi; M Costagli; G Tiberi; M Symms; M Tosetti
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Toward 20 T magnetic resonance for human brain studies: opportunities for discovery and neuroscience rationale.

Authors:  Thomas F Budinger; Mark D Bird; Lucio Frydman; Joanna R Long; Thomas H Mareci; William D Rooney; Bruce Rosen; John F Schenck; Victor D Schepkin; A Dean Sherry; Daniel K Sodickson; Charles S Springer; Keith R Thulborn; Kamil Uğurbil; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance safety.

Authors:  Steffen Sammet
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-03

Review 8.  Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields in magnetic resonance environment: an update on regulation, exposure assessment techniques, health risk evaluation, and surveillance.

Authors:  Valentina Hartwig; Giorgio Virgili; F Ederica Mattei; Cristiano Biagini; Stefania Romeo; Olga Zeni; Maria Rosaria Scarfì; Rita Massa; Francesco Campanella; Luigi Landini; Fabriziomaria Gobba; Alberto Modenese; Giulio Giovannetti
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Occupational exposure of healthcare and research staff to static magnetic stray fields from 1.5-7 Tesla MRI scanners is associated with reporting of transient symptoms.

Authors:  Kristel Schaap; Yvette Christopher-de Vries; Catherine K Mason; Frank de Vocht; Lützen Portengen; Hans Kromhout
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 4.402

10.  On the subjective acceptance during cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging at 7.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Sabrina Klix; Antje Els; Katharina Paul; Andreas Graessl; Celal Oezerdem; Oliver Weinberger; Lukas Winter; Christof Thalhammer; Till Huelnhagen; Jan Rieger; Heidrun Mehling; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Thoralf Niendorf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.