Literature DB >> 2292506

Prediction of binaural click lateralization by brainstem auditory evoked potentials.

M Furst1, S Eyal, A D Korczyn.   

Abstract

A previous study by Furst et al. (1985) has shown that in healthy subjects brainstem responses evoked by binaural auditory stimuli with interaural time difference (ITD) and interaural level difference (ILD) include information about the integration of data received by both ears. A correlation was found between the first major peak of the binaural difference waveform and perception of click lateralization and fusion. We have now tested whether a similar correlation exists in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The ability to lateralize dichotic clicks was tested in MS patients with normal audiograms. Two kinds of psychoacoustical experiments were employed: (1) A matching experiment in which the subject was asked to match the perceived positions of two click trains, one of which consisted of dichotic clicks with ILD and the other dichotic clicks with ITD; and (2) A positional JND experiment in which the subject was asked to determine the difference in perceived position of two successive click trains. Two reference positions were tested, the head center and the side of the head near the ear, while the control was either on ITD or on ILD. According to the psychoacoustical performances, three groups of patients were identified. Group I consisted of patients who performed normally in all the psychoacoustical experiments. Group II patients were able to lateralize binaural clicks but performed abnormally in the matching experiment and in the position discrimination experiment when the control was on ITD and the reference position was the head center. The patients in Group II performed normally in the discrimination experiments when the control was on ILD, and when the control was on ITD but the reference position was the head side. Group III consisted of those who were not able to perform either one of the psychoacoustical experiments. They perceived the same binaural clicks in different positions in different times. Brainstem auditory potentials evoked by dichotic clicks with different ILDs and ITDs were measured in all the MS patients, and the corresponding binaural difference (BD) waveforms were calculated. Whenever beta, the first major peak of BD, was identified it was used to obtain a physiological matching curve. It was derived by matching an ILD on the basis of similar beta latencies. For every patient, in either Group I or II, the physiological matching curve was very similar to his psychoacoustical matching curve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2292506     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(90)90113-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  9 in total

Review 1.  [The binaural interaction component: a clinically useful diagnostic instrument?].

Authors:  W Delb
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Preliminary results of the relationship between the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response and interaural pitch comparisons in bilateral cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Shuman He; Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 3.  The Physiological Basis and Clinical Use of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Geneviève Laumen; Alexander T Ferber; Georg M Klump; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Test-Retest Reliability of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Alexander T Ferber; Victor Benichoux; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Between-ear sound frequency disparity modulates a brain stem biomarker of binaural hearing.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Kelsey L Anbuhl; Jesse I Gilmer; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Selecting auditory alerting stimuli for eagles on the basis of auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Benjamin Goller; Patrice Baumhardt; Ernesto Dominguez-Villegas; Todd Katzner; Esteban Fernández-Juricic; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  The Binaural Interaction Component in Barn Owl (Tyto alba) Presents few Differences to Mammalian Data.

Authors:  Nicolas Palanca-Castan; Geneviève Laumen; Darrin Reed; Christine Köppl
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-25

8.  Normative Study of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Human Auditory Brainstem Response as a Function of Interaural Time Differences.

Authors:  Carol A Sammeth; Nathaniel T Greene; Andrew D Brown; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

9.  The Binaural Interaction Component in Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  John Peacock; Chase A Mackey; Monica A Benson; Jane A Burton; Nathaniel T Greene; Ramnarayan Ramachandran; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-12-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.