Literature DB >> 22922521

Clinical and radiological outcomes 5 years after matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation in patients with symptomatic, traumatic chondral defects.

Stefan Marlovits1, Silke Aldrian, Barbara Wondrasch, Lukas Zak, Christian Albrecht, Goetz Welsch, Siegfried Trattnig.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To date, few studies have been published reporting the 5-year follow-up of clinical and radiological outcomes for chondral defects treated with matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI). HYPOTHESIS: A significant improvement in clinical and radiological outcomes after treatment of symptomatic, traumatic chondral defects of the knee with the MACI implant will be maintained up to 5 years after surgery. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: A prospective evaluation of the MACI procedure was performed in 21 patients with chondral defects of the knee. After the MACI procedure, patients were clinically assessed with the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Tegner-Lysholm score, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form, and the modified Cincinnati score at years 1, 2, and 5. The quality of repair tissue was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging using the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score at months 3 and 6 and years 1, 2, and 5.
RESULTS: Significant improvements (P < .05) were observed for all 5 KOOS subcategories at year 1 and were maintained through year 5 in 90.5% of patients (19/21). Treatment failure occurred in only 9.5% of patients (2/21). Significant improvements (P < .05) from baseline to year 5 were also observed for the IKDC score (30.1 to 74.3), the modified Cincinnati score (38.1 to 79.6), and the Tegner-Lysholm activity score (1.8 to 4.3). Similarly, the MOCART score significantly improved (P < .001) from baseline to year 5 (52.9 to 75.8). After 5 years, complete filling (83%) and integration (82%) of the graft were seen in the majority of patients. Signs of subchondral bone edema were still present in 47% of patients at 5 years. No product-specific adverse events were reported over the 5-year follow-up period.
CONCLUSION: Patients treated with a MACI implant demonstrated significant clinical improvement and good quality repair tissue 5 years after surgery. The MACI procedure was shown to be a safe and effective treatment for symptomatic, traumatic chondral knee defects in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22922521     DOI: 10.1177/0363546512457008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  30 in total

Review 1.  Surgical Management of Osteochondral Defects of the Knee: An Educational Review.

Authors:  Matthew Howell; Quintin Liao; Christopher W Gee
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2021-02-15

2.  Biophysical stimulation improves clinical results of matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte implantation in the treatment of chondral lesions of the knee.

Authors:  Marco Collarile; Andrea Sambri; Giada Lullini; Matteo Cadossi; Claudio Zorzi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Implantation of matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte (MACI ®) grafts using carbon dioxide insufflation arthroscopy.

Authors:  Alberto Vascellari; Enrico Rebuzzi; Stefano Schiavetti; Nicolò Coletti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) for chondral defects in the patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  Daniel Meyerkort; Jay R Ebert; Timothy R Ackland; William B Robertson; Michael Fallon; M H Zheng; David J Wood
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Repair and tissue engineering techniques for articular cartilage.

Authors:  Eleftherios A Makris; Andreas H Gomoll; Konstantinos N Malizos; Jerry C Hu; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 20.543

6.  Is the clinical outcome after cartilage treatment affected by subchondral bone edema?

Authors:  Giuseppe Filardo; Elizaveta Kon; Alessandro Di Martino; Francesco Perdisa; Maurizio Busacca; Francesco Tentoni; Federica Balboni; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Treatment for cartilage injuries of the knee with a new treatment algorithm.

Authors:  Ahmet Ozmeriç; Kadir Bahadır Alemdaroğlu; Nevres Hürriyet Aydoğan
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-11-18

8.  New and Emerging Techniques in Cartilage Repair: MACI.

Authors:  Brad S Dunkin; Christian Lattermann
Journal:  Oper Tech Sports Med       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 0.280

9.  Use of cell-free collagen type I matrix implants for the treatment of small cartilage defects in the knee: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation.

Authors:  Karl F Schüttler; Hanno Schenker; Christina Theisen; Markus D Schofer; Alan Getgood; Philip P Roessler; Johannes Struewer; Marga B Rominger; Turgay Efe
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Evaluating the cartilage adjacent to the site of repair surgery with glycosaminoglycan-specific magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ulrich Koller; Sebastian Apprich; Benjamin Schmitt; Reinhard Windhager; Siegfried Trattnig
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.