Literature DB >> 24817164

Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) for chondral defects in the patellofemoral joint.

Daniel Meyerkort1, Jay R Ebert, Timothy R Ackland, William B Robertson, Michael Fallon, M H Zheng, David J Wood.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Both autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) and tibial tubercle transfer (TTT) have been used to treat chondral defects in the patellofemoral joint resulting in clinical improvement. Our study investigates the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) appearance of the matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) graft at 5-year follow-up to determine if it provides a durable treatment option in patients with an average age of 42 (standard deviation 11.6).
METHODS: Twenty-three patients were available for follow-up. Nine patients required realignment of the extensor mechanism with lateral release and TTT. The MRI magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) scoring system was used to assess the graft status. Clinical outcomes were assessed at these time periods.
RESULTS: The mean weighted MOCART composite score improved from 2.87 at 3 months to 3.39 at 5 years, indicating an intact appearance in most grafts. Graft height measured >50% of the adjacent native cartilage in 82% of patients. Clinical improvement assessed by the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, SF-36 (PCS) and the 6-minute walk test was demonstrated between pre-operative scores and final 5-year follow-up. 91% of patients would undergo MACI again. Correlation between MOCART and clinical scores were low in MACI to the patellofemoral joint. No significant difference was found in outcome between those that required realignment surgery compared with those that did not.
CONCLUSION: Patellofemoral MACI provides a durable graft on MRI assessment at 5 years with resultant clinical improvement. Further work is needed to determine which defect locations may benefit most from this procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24817164     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3046-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  42 in total

1.  Patellofemoral Pain Disorders: Evaluation and Management.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Periosteal autologous chondrocyte implantation for patellar chondral defect in patients with normal and abnormal patellar tracking.

Authors:  I J P Henderson; P Lavigne
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  MRI and clinical evaluation of collagen-covered autologous chondrocyte implantation (CACI) at two years.

Authors:  W B Robertson; D Fick; D J Wood; J M Linklater; M H Zheng; T R Ackland
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Degenerative joint disease on MRI and physical activity: a clinical study of the knee joint in 320 patients.

Authors:  G F Bachmann; E Basad; K Rauber; M S Damian; W S Rau
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Matrix-based autologous chondrocyte implantation for cartilage repair with HyalograftC: two-year follow-up by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S Trattnig; K Pinker; C Krestan; C Plank; S Millington; S Marlovits
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2005-09-23       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Propensity for osteoarthritis and lower limb joint pain in retired professional soccer players.

Authors:  S Drawer; C W Fuller
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 13.800

7.  Repair of osteochondral lesions in the knee by chondrocyte implantation using the MACI® technique.

Authors:  Alberto Ventura; Antonio Memeo; Enrico Borgo; Clara Terzaghi; Claudio Legnani; Walter Albisetti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Improved outcomes with combined autologous chondrocyte implantation and patellofemoral osteotomy versus isolated autologous chondrocyte implantation.

Authors:  Thai Q Trinh; Joshua D Harris; Robert A Siston; David C Flanigan
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation improves patellofemoral cartilage treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Jack Farr
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Distal realignment and patellar autologous chondrocyte implantation: mid-term results in a selected population.

Authors:  Antonio Gigante; Davide Enea; Francesco Greco; Corrado Bait; Matteo Denti; Herbert Schonhuber; Piero Volpi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  20 in total

1.  Rediscovering the patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  David Dejour; Elizabeth Arendt; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Revision surgery after third generation autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee.

Authors:  Thomas R Niethammer; Thomas Niethammer; Siegfried Valentin; Andreas Ficklscherer; Mehmet F Gülecyüz; Mehmet Gülecyüz; Matthias F Pietschmann; Matthias Pietschmann; Peter E Müller; Peter Müller
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Return to sport after the surgical management of articular cartilage lesions in the knee: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aaron J Krych; Ayoosh Pareek; Alexander H King; Nick R Johnson; Michael J Stuart; Riley J Williams
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation: Is it likely to become a saviour of large-sized and full-thickness cartilage defect in young adult knee?

Authors:  Chi Zhang; You-Zhi Cai; Xiang-Jin Lin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (mACI) versus autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) for chondral defects of the knee: a systematic review.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Jörg Eschweiler; Christian Götze; Arne Driessen; Markus Tingart; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 5.841

6.  Cartilage Defect Treatment Using High-Density Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation: Two-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Juan Manuel Lopez-Alcorocho; Lucia Aboli; Isabel Guillen-Vicente; Elena Rodriguez-Iñigo; Marta Guillen-Vicente; Tomás F Fernández-Jaén; Santiago Arauz; Steve Abelow; Pedro Guillen-García
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Second-look assessment after all-arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation with spheroides at the knee joint.

Authors:  Rainer Siebold; Georgios Karidakis; Sven Feil; Francis Fernandez
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Accurate Reporting of Concomitant Procedures Is Highly Variable in Studies Investigating Knee Cartilage Restoration.

Authors:  William L Sheppard; Betina B Hinckel; Armin Arshi; Seth L Sherman; Kristofer J Jones
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Effect of the defect localization and size on the success of third-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee joint.

Authors:  Thomas R Niethammer; David Gallik; Y Chevalier; Martin Holzgruber; Andrea Baur-Melnyk; Peter E Müller; Matthias F Pietschmann
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-12-06       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Cartilage Restoration of Patellofemoral Lesions: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Renato Andrade; Joni Nunes; Betina B Hinckel; Jordan Gruskay; Sebastiano Vasta; Ricardo Bastos; J Miguel Oliveira; Rui L Reis; Andreas H Gomoll; João Espregueira-Mendes
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.