Literature DB >> 12900610

Osteogenesis in calvarial defects: contribution of the dura, the pericranium, and the surrounding bone in adult versus infant animals.

Arun K Gosain1, Timothy D Santoro, Lian-Sheng Song, Christopher C Capel, P V Sudhakar, Hani S Matloub.   

Abstract

Guided bone regeneration is a promising means for reconstructing bone defects in the cranium. The present study was performed to better define those factors that affect osteogenesis in the cranium. The authors studied a single animal model, investigating the contribution of the dura, the pericranium, and the adjacent calvarial bone in the process of calvarial regeneration in both mature and immature animals. Bilateral, 100-mm2, parietal calvariectomies were performed in immature (n = 16) and mature (n = 16) rabbits. Parietal defects were randomized to one of four groups depending on the differential blockade of the dura and/or the pericranium by expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes. Animals were humanely killed after 12 weeks, and histometric analysis was performed to quantitate the area of the original bone defect, new bone formation, and new bone density. Bone formation was quantified separately both at the periphery and in the center of the defects. Extrasite bone formation was also quantified both on the dural and on the pericranial sides of the barriers. Bone regeneration was incomplete in all groups over the 12-week study period, indicating that complete bone healing was not observed in any group. The dura was more osteogenic than the pericranium in mature and immature animals, as there was significantly more extrasite bone formed on the dural side in the double expanded polytetrafluoroethylene barrier groups. In both the dural and the double expanded polytetrafluoroethylene barrier groups, dural bone production was significantly greater in immature compared with mature animals. The dura appeared to be the source of central new bone, because dural blockade in the dural and double expanded polytetrafluoroethylene groups resulted in a significant decrease in central bone density in both mature and immature animals. Paradoxically, isolation of the pericranium in mature animals resulted in a significant reduction in total new bone area, whereas pericranial contact appeared to enhance peripheral new bone formation, with the control group having the greatest total new bone area. The present study establishes a model to quantitatively study the process of bone regeneration in calvarial defects and highlights differences in the contribution of the dura and pericranium to calvarial bone regeneration between infant and adult animals. On the basis of these findings, the authors propose that subsequent studies in which permeability of the expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes is altered to permit migration of osteoinductive proteins into the defect while blocking prolapse of adjacent soft tissues may help to make guided bone regeneration a realistic alternative for the repair of cranial defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12900610     DOI: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000070728.56716.51

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  40 in total

1.  Tissue interactions between craniosynostotic dura mater and bone.

Authors:  Gregory M Cooper; Emily L Durham; James J Cray; Michael I Siegel; Joseph E Losee; Mark P Mooney
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  Spatiotemporal Analyses of Osteogenesis and Angiogenesis via Intravital Imaging in Cranial Bone Defect Repair.

Authors:  Chunlan Huang; Vincent P Ness; Xiaochuan Yang; Hongli Chen; Jiebo Luo; Edward B Brown; Xinping Zhang
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Undifferentiated human adipose-derived stromal/stem cells loaded onto wet-spun starch-polycaprolactone scaffolds enhance bone regeneration: nude mice calvarial defect in vivo study.

Authors:  Pedro P Carvalho; Isabel B Leonor; Brenda J Smith; Isabel R Dias; Rui L Reis; Jeffrey M Gimble; Manuela E Gomes
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 4.396

4.  Dura mater stimulates human adipose-derived stromal cells to undergo bone formation in mouse calvarial defects.

Authors:  Benjamin Levi; Emily R Nelson; Shuli Li; Aaron W James; Jeong S Hyun; Daniel T Montoro; Min Lee; Jason P Glotzbach; George W Commons; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 6.277

Review 5.  [The latest study on biomimetic mineralized collagen-based bone materials for pediatric skull regeneration and repair].

Authors:  Bo Li; Shuo Wang; Yonggang Zhao; Xiumei Wang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-03-15

6.  Spontaneous bone formation in a large craniectomy defect.

Authors:  Bhushan Diwakar Thombre; A R Prabhuraj
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Intradiploic pseudomeningocele and ossified occipitocervical pseudomeningocele after decompressive surgery for Chiari I malformation: report of two cases and literature review.

Authors:  Arthur R Kurzbuch; Shailendra Magdum; Jayaratnam Jayamohan
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.042

8.  Dipyridamole enhances osteogenesis of three-dimensionally printed bioactive ceramic scaffolds in calvarial defects.

Authors:  Jonathan M Bekisz; Roberto L Flores; Lukasz Witek; Christopher D Lopez; Christopher M Runyan; Andrea Torroni; Bruce N Cronstein; Paulo G Coelho
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  Collagen-hydroxyapatite composite enhances regeneration of calvaria bone defects in young rats but postpones the regeneration of calvaria bone in aged rats.

Authors:  Ion Tcacencu; Mikael Wendel
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Human adipose derived stromal cells heal critical size mouse calvarial defects.

Authors:  Benjamin Levi; Aaron W James; Emily R Nelson; Dean Vistnes; Benjamin Wu; Min Lee; Ankur Gupta; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.