| Literature DB >> 22916257 |
Stephan Borte1, Magdalena Janzi, Qiang Pan-Hammarström, Ulrika von Döbeln, Lennart Nordvall, Jacek Winiarski, Anders Fasth, Lennart Hammarström.
Abstract
There is a need for neonatal screening tools to improve the long-term clinical outcome of patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases (PID). Recently, a PCR-based screening method for both TRECs and KRECs using Guthrie card samples has been developed. However, the applicability of these excision circle assays is limited to patients with severe T or B cell lymphopenia (SCID, XLA and A-T), whereas the most common forms of PID are not detected. Absence of serum IgA is seen in a major fraction of patients with immunological defects. As serum IgA in newborns is considered to be of fetal origin, eluates from routinely collected dried blood spot samples might thus be suitable for identification of children with PID. To assess the applicability of such screening assays, stored Guthrie card samples were obtained from 47 patients with various forms of primary immunodeficiency diseases (SCID, XLA, A-T, HIGM and IgAD), 20 individuals with normal serum IgA levels born to IgA-deficient mothers and 51 matched healthy newborns. Surprisingly, normal serum IgA levels were found in all SCID, XLA, A-T and HIGM patients and, additionally, in all those IgAD patients born to IgA-sufficient mothers. Conversely, no serum IgA was found in any of the 16 IgAD patients born by IgA-deficient mothers. Moreover, half of the IgA-sufficient individuals born by IgA-deficient mothers also lacked IgA at birth whereas no IgA-deficient individuals were found among the controls. IgA in neonatal dried blood samples thus appears to be of both maternal and fetal origin and precludes its use as a reliable marker for neonatal screening of primary immunodeficiency diseases.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22916257 PMCID: PMC3420892 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043419
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
IgA levels and total T cell count for a selection of PID with IgA deficiency included in the phenotype.
| Disease | Estimated incidence | T lymphopenia present at birth | IgA deficiency observed in the clinical phenotype | |
| IgAD | 1∶600 | No | Yes | |
| CVID | 1∶20–50.000 | No | Yes | |
| HIGM | 1∶300.000 | No | Yes | |
| XLA | 1∶70–100.000 | No | 68 in 103 reported cases (66%) | |
| A-T | 1∶100.000 | Yes | 243 in 420 reported cases (58%) | |
| SCID |
| 1∶200.000 | Yes | 11 in 12 reported cases (92%) |
| SCID |
| 1∶500.000 | Yes | 12 in 15 reported cases (80%) |
| SCID |
| not known | Yes | 15 in 24 reported cases (62%) |
| SCID |
| 1∶100.000 | Yes | 20 in 45 reported cases (44%) |
| SCID |
| 1∶100.000 | Yes | 15 in 20 reported cases (75%) |
| SCID |
| 1∶200–1.000.000 | Yes | 23 in 40 reported cases (57%) |
| DiGeorge syndrome with relevantfeatures of immunodeficiency | 1∶15.000 | Yes | 9 in 17 reported cases (53%) | |
Adapted from the prevalence seen in adults.
Clinically relevant T cell lymphopenia defined as CD3+ T cell counts <500/mm3.
Serum IgA levels <0.07 g/L.
Percentage agreement of the IgA elution from DBSS by ELISA compared to reference serum IgA levels measured by nephelometry.
| Elutioncondition | 4°Ctemperature | 22°Ctemperature | 37°Ctemperature |
| 1 hour | 78% | 82% | 61% |
| 24 hours | 87% | 93% | 90% |
| 48 hours | 84% | 85% | 86% |
| 7 days | 86% | 86% | 69% |
Figure 1Impact of the storage time on the detection of IgA levels in DBSS eluates.
The overall correlation is shown as a red trend line (ρ = −0.54). DBSS with undetectable IgA levels are not shown.
Figure 2IgA levels in eluates from neonatal DBSS. Mean IgA levels per group are marked as horizontal red bars.
One SCID patient was excluded due to extremely high levels of IgA in the DBSS eluate. SCID, A-T and XLA DBSS have previously shown to result in abnormal test results in the TREC/KREC assay and have been indicated by red asterisks [26], [27].
Descriptive test characteristics of measuring IgA levels in DBSS to predict IgA-deficient newborns (group II).
| Cutoff value | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV |
| ≤0.35 | 0.39 | 1.0 | 100% | 63% |
| ≤0.6 | 0.41 | 0.96 | 90% | 64% |
| ≤0.9 | 0.47 | 0.92 | 84% | 66% |
| ≤1.2 | 0.5 | 0.84 | 74% | 65% |
Serum IgA [mg/L]; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value. PPV and NPV calculations are based on cumulative prevalence estimates from adults with diseases represented in group II.
Figure 3ROC curve plot depicting the performance of serum IgA levels in DBSS to predict IgA-deficient newborns (group II) compared with healthy newborns (group I).