Literature DB >> 22915668

Social networks predict patch discovery in a wild population of songbirds.

L M Aplin1, D R Farine, J Morand-Ferron, B C Sheldon.   

Abstract

Animals use social information in a wide variety of contexts. Its extensive use by individuals to locate food patches has been documented in a number of species, and various mechanisms of discovery have been identified. However, less is known about whether individuals differ in their access to, and use of, social information to find food. We measured the social network of a wild population of three sympatric tit species (family Paridae) and then recorded individual discovery of novel food patches. By using recently developed methods for network-based diffusion analysis, we show that order of arrival at new food patches was predicted by social associations. Models based only on group searching did not explain this relationship. Furthermore, network position was correlated with likelihood of patch discovery, with central individuals more likely to locate and use novel foraging patches than those with limited social connections. These results demonstrate the utility of social network analysis as a method to investigate social information use, and suggest that the greater probability of receiving social information about new foraging patches confers a benefit on more socially connected individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22915668      PMCID: PMC3441092          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  18 in total

1.  Social influences on foraging in vertebrates: causal mechanisms and adaptive functions.

Authors:  Bennett G. Galef; Luc-Alain Giraldeau
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 2.  Personality in the context of social networks.

Authors:  J Krause; R James; D P Croft
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Identifying the role that animals play in their social networks.

Authors:  David Lusseau; M E J Newman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology.

Authors:  Sasha R X Dall; Luc-Alain Giraldeau; Ola Olsson; John M McNamara; David W Stephens
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-01-25       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 5.  Social information use is a process across time, space, and ecology, reaching heterospecifics.

Authors:  Janne-Tuomas Seppänen; Jukka T Forsman; Mikko Mönkkönen; Robert L Thomson
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  How rugged individualists enable one another to find food and shelter: field experiments with tropical hermit crabs.

Authors:  Mark E Laidre
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Detecting social transmission in networks.

Authors:  William Hoppitt; Neeltje J Boogert; Kevin N Laland
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Individual differences in the use of social information in foraging by captive great tits.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  Network-based diffusion analysis: a new method for detecting social learning.

Authors:  Mathias Franz; Charles L Nunn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Wild redfronted lemurs (Eulemur rufifrons) use social information to learn new foraging techniques.

Authors:  Anna Viktoria Schnoell; Claudia Fichtel
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-03-18       Impact factor: 3.084

View more
  81 in total

1.  Feeder use predicts both acquisition and transmission of a contagious pathogen in a North American songbird.

Authors:  James S Adelman; Sahnzi C Moyers; Damien R Farine; Dana M Hawley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The early bird gets the worm: foraging strategies of wild songbirds lead to the early discovery of food sources.

Authors:  Damien R Farine; Stephen D J Lang
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Differential female sociality is linked with the fine-scale structure of sexual interactions in replicate groups of red junglefowl, Gallus gallus.

Authors:  Grant C McDonald; Lewis G Spurgin; Eleanor A Fairfield; David S Richardson; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Friends of friends: are indirect connections in social networks important to animal behaviour?

Authors:  Lauren J N Brent
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Conformity does not perpetuate suboptimal traditions in a wild population of songbirds.

Authors:  Lucy M Aplin; Ben C Sheldon; Richard McElreath
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  How does cognition shape social relationships?

Authors:  Claudia A F Wascher; Ipek G Kulahci; Ellis J G Langley; Rachael C Shaw
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  The use of multilayer network analysis in animal behaviour.

Authors:  Kelly R Finn; Matthew J Silk; Mason A Porter; Noa Pinter-Wollman
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  How social network structure affects decision-making in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Cristian Pasquaretta; Marine Battesti; Elizabeth Klenschi; Christophe A H Bousquet; Cedric Sueur; Frederic Mery
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Indirectly connected: simple social differences can explain the causes and apparent consequences of complex social network positions.

Authors:  Josh A Firth; Ben C Sheldon; Lauren J N Brent
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  The conceptual foundations of network-based diffusion analysis: choosing networks and interpreting results.

Authors:  Will Hoppitt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.