Literature DB >> 29061891

The conceptual foundations of network-based diffusion analysis: choosing networks and interpreting results.

Will Hoppitt1.   

Abstract

Network-based diffusion analysis (NBDA) is a statistical technique for detecting the social transmission of behavioural innovations in groups of animals, including humans. The strength of social transmission is inferred from the extent to which the diffusion (spread) of the innovation follows a social network. NBDA can have two goals: (a) to establish whether social transmission is occurring and how strong its effects are; and/or (b) to establish the typical pathways of information transfer. The technique has been used in a range of taxa, including primates, cetaceans, birds and fish, using a range of different types of network. Here I investigate the conceptual underpinnings of NBDA, in order to establish the meaning of results using different networks. I develop a model of the social transmission process where each individual observation of the target behaviour affects the rate at which the observer learns that behaviour. I then establish how NBDAs using different networks relate to this underlying process, and thus how we can interpret the results of each. My analysis shows that a different network or networks are appropriate depending on the specific goal or goals of the study, and establishes how the parameter estimates yielded from an NBDA can be interpreted for different networks.This article is part of the themed issue 'Process and pattern in innovations from cells to societies'.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  culture; network-based diffusion analysis; social learning; social transmission

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29061891      PMCID: PMC5665806          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  29 in total

Review 1.  Social learning strategies.

Authors:  Kevin N Laland
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 2.  Distinguishing social and asocial learning using diffusion dynamics.

Authors:  Simon M Reader
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 3.  Cognitive culture: theoretical and empirical insights into social learning strategies.

Authors:  Luke Rendell; Laurel Fogarty; William J E Hoppitt; Thomas J H Morgan; Mike M Webster; Kevin N Laland
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Diffusion dynamics of socially learned foraging techniques in squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  Nicolas Claidière; Emily J E Messer; William Hoppitt; Andrew Whiten
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Chimpanzees copy dominant and knowledgeable individuals: implications for cultural diversity.

Authors:  Rachel Kendal; Lydia M Hopper; Andrew Whiten; Sarah F Brosnan; Susan P Lambeth; Steven J Schapiro; Will Hoppitt
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.178

6.  Conformist learning in nine-spined sticklebacks' foraging decisions.

Authors:  Thomas W Pike; Kevin N Laland
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Network-based diffusion analysis reveals cultural transmission of lobtail feeding in humpback whales.

Authors:  Jenny Allen; Mason Weinrich; Will Hoppitt; Luke Rendell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Innovation and the growth of human population.

Authors:  V P Weinberger; C Quiñinao; P A Marquet
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Bayesian Model Selection with Network Based Diffusion Analysis.

Authors:  Andrew Whalen; William J E Hoppitt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-04-05

10.  Social networks predict selective observation and information spread in ravens.

Authors:  Ipek G Kulahci; Daniel I Rubenstein; Thomas Bugnyar; William Hoppitt; Nace Mikus; Christine Schwab
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Cooperation and cheating as innovation: insights from cellular societies.

Authors:  Athena Aktipis; Carlo C Maley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Innovation: an emerging focus from cells to societies.

Authors:  Michael E Hochberg; Pablo A Marquet; Robert Boyd; Andreas Wagner
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Innovation and social transmission in experimental micro-societies: exploring the scope of cumulative culture in young children.

Authors:  Nicola McGuigan; Emily Burdett; Vanessa Burgess; Lewis Dean; Amanda Lucas; Gillian Vale; Andrew Whiten
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Captive Asian short-clawed otters (Aonyx cinereus) learn to exploit unfamiliar natural prey.

Authors:  Alexander M Saliveros; Madison Bowden-Parry; Fraser McAusland; Neeltje J Boogert
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.653

5.  The modularity of a social group does not affect the transmission speed of a novel, socially learned behaviour, or the formation of local variants.

Authors:  Philippa R Laker; William Hoppitt; Michael Weiss; Joah R Madden
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Food discovery is associated with different reliance on social learning and lower cognitive flexibility across environments in a food-caching bird.

Authors:  Virginia K Heinen; Angela M Pitera; Benjamin R Sonnenberg; Lauren M Benedict; Eli S Bridge; Damien R Farine; Vladimir V Pravosudov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 5.530

7.  Social learning in otters.

Authors:  Zosia Ladds; William Hoppitt; Neeltje J Boogert
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Cultural transmission modes of music sampling traditions remain stable despite delocalization in the digital age.

Authors:  Mason Youngblood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Network-based diffusion analysis reveals context-specific dominance of dance communication in foraging honeybees.

Authors:  Matthew J Hasenjager; William Hoppitt; Ellouise Leadbeater
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Tutors do not facilitate rapid resource exploitation in temporary tadpole aggregations.

Authors:  Zoltán Tóth; Boglárka Jaloveczki
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.