Literature DB >> 20064530

Detecting social transmission in networks.

William Hoppitt1, Neeltje J Boogert, Kevin N Laland.   

Abstract

In recent years researchers have drawn attention to a need for new methods with which to identify the spread of behavioural innovations through social transmission in animal populations. Network-based analyses seek to recognise diffusions mediated by social learning by detecting a correspondence between patterns of association and the flow of information through groups. Here we introduce a new order of acquisition diffusion analysis (OADA) and develop established time of acquisition diffusion analysis (TADA) methods further. Through simulation we compare the merits of these and other approaches, demonstrating that OADA and TADA have greater power and lower Type I error rates than available alternatives, and specifying when each approach should be deployed. We illustrate the new methods by applying them to reanalyse an established dataset corresponding to the diffusion of foraging innovations in starlings, where OADA and TADA detect social transmission that hitherto had been missed. The methods are potentially widely applicable by researchers wishing to detect social learning in natural and captive populations of animals, and to facilitate this we provide code to implement OADA and TADA in the statistical package R. (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20064530     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  52 in total

1.  The effect of task structure on diffusion dynamics: Implications for diffusion curve and network-based analyses.

Authors:  Will Hoppitt; Anne Kandler; Jeremy R Kendal; Kevin N Laland
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Social learning research outside the laboratory: How and why?

Authors:  Rachel L Kendal; Bennett G Galef; Carel P van Schaik
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  The Achilles' heel hypothesis: misinformed keystone individuals impair collective learning and reduce group success.

Authors:  Jonathan N Pruitt; Colin M Wright; Carl N Keiser; Alex E DeMarco; Matthew M Grobis; Noa Pinter-Wollman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Friends of friends: are indirect connections in social networks important to animal behaviour?

Authors:  Lauren J N Brent
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Modeling imitation and emulation in constrained search spaces.

Authors:  Alberto Acerbi; Claudio Tennie; Charles L Nunn
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Multi-network-based diffusion analysis reveals vertical cultural transmission of sponge tool use within dolphin matrilines.

Authors:  Sonja Wild; Simon J Allen; Michael Krützen; Stephanie L King; Livia Gerber; William J E Hoppitt
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Modelling the spread of innovation in wild birds.

Authors:  Thomas R Shultz; Marcel Montrey; Lucy M Aplin
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 8.  How does cognition shape social relationships?

Authors:  Claudia A F Wascher; Ipek G Kulahci; Ellis J G Langley; Rachael C Shaw
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Evidence for social learning in wild lemurs (Lemur catta).

Authors:  Rachel L Kendal; Deborah M Custance; Jeremy R Kendal; Gillian Vale; Tara S Stoinski; Nirina Lalaina Rakotomalala; Hantanirina Rasamimanana
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.986

10.  Investigating the impact of observation errors on the statistical performance of network-based diffusion analysis.

Authors:  Mathias Franz; Charles L Nunn
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.