Literature DB >> 22914213

An international series on abdominal radical trachelectomy: 101 patients and 28 pregnancies.

Stephanie L Wethington1, David Cibula, Linda R Duska, Leslie Garrett, Christine H Kim, Dennis S Chi, Yukio Sonoda, Nadeem R Abu-Rustum.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Abdominal radical trachelectomy (ART) is a type C resection (uterine vessels ligated at origin from the hypogastric vessels). Questions arise as to whether fertility is maintained after ART, particularly when uterine vessels are sacrificed. We report an international series on ART to describe fertility and oncologic outcomes.
METHODS: Databases at 3 institutions were queried to identify patients planned for ART from 1999 to 2011. Clinical and demographic data were gathered.
RESULTS: One hundred one patients underwent ART. Mean age was 31 years (range, 19-43 years). Histologic classifications were adenocarcinoma (n = 54), squamous cell carcinoma (n = 40), adenosquamous carcinoma (n = 6), and clear cell carcinoma (n = 1). Twenty patients (20%) required conversion to hysterectomy (10 margins and 10 nodes). Eight patients underwent completion hysterectomy owing to the following: positive margins on final pathology (n = 3), patient's choice (n = 4), or recurrence (n = 1). Postoperatively, 20 patients (20%) received adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation (4 final pathology margins and 16 nodes). Four patients (4%) had recurrence and lived 22 to 35 months after diagnosis. Of the 70 women who had neither hysterectomy nor adjuvant therapy, 38 (54%) attempted pregnancy and 28 (74%) achieved pregnancy. Thirty-one pregnancies resulted in 16 (52%) third trimester deliveries. Six patients are currently pregnant with outcomes pending.
CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that ART preserves fertility and maintains excellent oncologic outcomes. Most women (74%) attempting pregnancy after ART are able to achieve pregnancy and deliver in the third trimester (52%). Preservation of the uterine vasculature is not necessary for fertility; obstetrical outcomes are similar to those of the historical vaginal radical trachelectomy cohorts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22914213     DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e318263eee2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  24 in total

1.  Outcomes of abdominal radical trachelectomy: results of a multicenter prospective cohort study in a Tohoku Gynecologic Cancer Unit.

Authors:  Hideki Tokunaga; Yoh Watanabe; Hitoshi Niikura; Satoru Nagase; Masafumi Toyoshima; Reiji Shiro; Yoshihito Yokoyama; Hideki Mizunuma; Tsuyoshi Ohta; Hiroshi Nishiyama; Takafumi Watanabe; Naoki Sato; Naoto Sato; Toru Sugiyama; Tadao Takano; Fumiaki Takahashi; Nobuo Yaegashi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Reproductive outcomes following treatment for a gynecological cancer diagnosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Brigitte Gerstl; Elizabeth Sullivan; Marcus Vallejo; Jana Koch; Maximilian Johnson; Handan Wand; Kate Webber; Angela Ives; Antoinette Anazodo
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Uterine-Preserving Surgery in Young Women With Stage Ib1 Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Jill H Tseng; Alessia Aloisi; Yukio Sonoda; Ginger J Gardner; Oliver Zivanovic; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Mario M Leitao
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 4.  Management of low-risk early-stage cervical cancer: should conization, simple trachelectomy, or simple hysterectomy replace radical surgery as the new standard of care?

Authors:  Pedro T Ramirez; Rene Pareja; Gabriel J Rendón; Carlos Millan; Michael Frumovitz; Kathleen M Schmeler
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 5.  Radical Trachelectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Anthony Costales; Chad Michener; Pedro F Escobar-Rodriguez
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-11-19

6.  Expanding the indications for radical trachelectomy: a report on 29 patients with stage IB1 tumors measuring 2 to 4 centimeters.

Authors:  Stephanie L Wethington; Yukio Sonoda; Kay J Park; Kaled M Alektiar; William P Tew; Dennis S Chi; Mario M Leitao; Elizabeth L Jewell; Richard R Barakat; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.437

7.  Utility of indocyanine green (ICG) intra-operative angiography to determine uterine vascular perfusion at the time of radical trachelectomy.

Authors:  Pedro F Escobar; Pedro T Ramirez; Rafael E Garcia Ocasio; Rene Pareja; Steve Zimberg; Michael Sprague; Michael Frumovitz
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 8.  Fertility-Sparing Options in Young Women with Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Federica Tomao; Giacomo Corrado; Fedro Alessandro Peccatori; Sara Boveri; Eleonora Petra Preti; Nicoletta Colombo; Fabio Landoni
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2016-01

Review 9.  Can We Be Less Radical with Surgery for Early Cervical Cancer?

Authors:  Madeleine C Macdonald; John A Tidy
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  Abdominal radical trachelectomy as fertility-sparing management for early stages of cervical cancer: Our experience in 18 cases.

Authors:  Szilard Leo Kiss; Anas Fandi; Alexandra Lavinia Cozlea; Mihai Gheorghe; Mihai Stanca; Nicolae Bacalbașa; Andreea Anamaria Moldovan; Mihai Emil Căpîlna
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.