Literature DB >> 26810054

Fertility-Sparing Options in Young Women with Cervical Cancer.

Federica Tomao1,2, Giacomo Corrado3, Fedro Alessandro Peccatori4, Sara Boveri4, Eleonora Petra Preti4, Nicoletta Colombo4, Fabio Landoni4.   

Abstract

OPINION STATEMENT: Cervical cancer (CC) is the fourth most frequent tumor and the fourth most common cause of cancer death among women worldwide. Furthermore, more than 40 % of women with early CC are affected during reproductive age and wish to remain fertile. Thus, many patients demand a more conservative policy for managing these lesions in order to have an uneventful pregnancy in the near future. For this reason, interest in fertility preservation strategies has been increasing, and the number of published studies on this topic has grown significantly. Conization was the first fertility-sparing surgical procedure tested in stage IA1 CC. However, in recent decades, other strategies have been tested, particularly for more advanced tumors. The aim of this review is to analyze the main techniques performed in patients with CC who are eligible for fertility-sparing surgery, with particular attention paid to open questions and controversies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Conization; Fertility sparing; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Trachelectomy; Uterus transplantation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26810054     DOI: 10.1007/s11864-015-0386-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol        ISSN: 1534-6277


  91 in total

1.  Early cervical carcinoma: the natural history of lymph node involvement redefined on the basis of thorough parametrectomy and giant section study.

Authors:  P Benedetti-Panici; F Maneschi; G D'Andrea; G Cutillo; C Rabitti; M Congiu; F Coronetta; A Capelli
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Robotically assisted total laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for fertility sparing in stage IB1 adenosarcoma of the cervix.

Authors:  John P Geisler; Curtis J Orr; Kelly J Manahan
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.878

3.  Robotic uterine artery preservation and nerve-sparing radical trachelectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy in early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Dae Gy Hong; Yoon Soon Lee; Nae Yoon Park; Gun Oh Chong; Il Soo Park; Young Lae Cho
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.437

4.  Development of criteria for ovarian preservation in cervical cancer patients treated with radical surgery with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a multicenter retrospective study and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ting Hu; Li Wu; Hui Xing; Ru Yang; Xiong Li; Kecheng Huang; Yao Jia; Qinghua Zhang; Zhilan Chen; Shaoshuai Wang; Dan Liu; Xiaobing Han; Zhongqiu Lin; Pengpeng Qu; Hongbing Cai; Xiaojie Song; Xiaoyu Tian; Hui Wang; Shixuan Wang; Xing Xie; Shuang Li; Ding Ma
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Laparoscopic lymph node dissection should be performed before fertility preserving treatment of patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Giuseppe F Vercellino; Jurgen M J Piek; Achim Schneider; Christhardt Köhler; Mandy Mangler; Dorothee Speiser; Vito Chiantera
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  A fertility-sparing alternative to radical hysterectomy: how many patients may be eligible?

Authors:  Yukio Sonoda; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Mary L Gemignani; Dennis S Chi; Carol L Brown; Elizabeth A Poynor; Richard R Barakat
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Preoperative pathologic findings associated with residual disease at radical hysterectomy in women with stage IA2 cervical cancer.

Authors:  Anuj Suri; Michael Frumovitz; Michael R Milam; Ricardo dos Reis; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Radical vaginal versus abdominal trachelectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer: a comparison of surgical and pathologic outcomes.

Authors:  Margaret H Einstein; Kay J Park; Yukio Sonoda; Jeanne Carter; Dennis S Chi; Richard R Barakat; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Parametrial involvement in radical hysterectomy specimens for women with early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Michael Frumovitz; Charlotte C Sun; Kathleen M Schmeler; Michael T Deavers; Ricardo Dos Reis; Charles F Levenback; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.396

View more
  5 in total

1.  Fertility-sparing surgery in early-stage cervical cancer: laparoscopic versus abdominal radical trachelectomy.

Authors:  Zuoxi He; Ce Bian; Chuan Xie
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Uterine-Preserving Surgery in Young Women With Stage Ib1 Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Jill H Tseng; Alessia Aloisi; Yukio Sonoda; Ginger J Gardner; Oliver Zivanovic; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Mario M Leitao
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 3.  The association between short-term response and long-term survival for cervical cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a system review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shi-Yi Kong; Kecheng Huang; Chao Zeng; Xiangyi Ma; Shixuan Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Fertility preservation in gynaecologic cancers.

Authors:  Francesca De Felice; Claudia Marchetti; Anna Di Pinto; Angela Musella; Innocenza Palaia; Maria Grazia Porpora; Ludovico Muzii; Vincenzo Tombolini; Pierluigi Benedetti Panici; Federica Tomao
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2018-01-16

5.  Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Benefit of Cervical Cancer Screening with Liquid Based Cytology Compared with Conventional Cytology in Germany.

Authors:  Stephanie F Armstrong; Julian F Guest
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2020-03-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.