Literature DB >> 27048284

Assessing Acceptability of Self-Sampling Kits, Prevalence, and Risk Factors for Human Papillomavirus Infection in American Indian Women.

Rachel L Winer1, Angela A Gonzales2, Carolyn J Noonan3, Stephen L Cherne4, Dedra S Buchwald3.   

Abstract

We evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and calculated the prevalence of and risk factors for high-risk (hr) HPV infections in a community-based sample of American Indian women. To this end, we recruited 329 Hopi women aged 21-65 years to self-collect vaginal samples for hrHPV testing. Samples were tested by polymerase chain reaction for 14 hrHPV genotypes. We used Chi square tests to identify correlates of preference for clinician Pap testing versus HPV self-sampling, and age-adjusted Poisson regression to evaluate correlates of hrHPV prevalence. We found that satisfaction with HPV self-sampling was high, with 96 % of women reporting that the sample was easy to collect and 87 % reporting no discomfort. The majority (62 %) indicated that they preferred HPV self-sampling to receiving a Pap test from a clinician. Preference for Pap testing over HPV self-sampling was positively associated with adherence to Pap screening and employment outside the home. All samples evaluated were satisfactory for HPV testing, and 22 % were positive for hrHPV. HrHPV prevalence peaked in the late 20 s and declined with increasing age. HrHPV positivity was inversely associated with having children living the household. In conclusion, HPV self-sampling is feasible and acceptable to Hopi women, and could be effective in increasing rates of cervical cancer screening in Hopi communities. HrHPV prevalence was similar to estimates in the general United States population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acceptability; American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN); Human papillomavirus (HPV); Prevalence; Self-sampling

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27048284      PMCID: PMC5011445          DOI: 10.1007/s10900-016-0189-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  42 in total

1.  Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes.

Authors:  Louise-Anne McNutt; Chuntao Wu; Xiaonan Xue; Jean Paul Hafner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  A cross-sectional study on the acceptability of self-collection for HPV testing among women in rural China.

Authors:  YaoYao Guan; Philip E Castle; Shaoming Wang; Belinda Li; Changyan Feng; Puwa Ci; Xue Li; Patti Gravitt; You-Lin Qiao
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.519

3.  Barriers to cervical cancer screening attendance in England: a population-based survey.

Authors:  Jo Waller; Marta Bartoszek; Laura Marlow; Jane Wardle
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.136

Review 4.  The potential role of self-sampling for high-risk human papillomavirus detection in cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Channa E Schmeink; Ruud L M Bekkers; Leon F A G Massuger; Willem J G Melchers
Journal:  Rev Med Virol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 6.989

5.  Use of primary high-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening: interim clinical guidance.

Authors:  Warner K Huh; Kevin A Ault; David Chelmow; Diane D Davey; Robert A Goulart; Francisco A R Garcia; Walter K Kinney; L Stewart Massad; Edward J Mayeaux; Debbie Saslow; Mark Schiffman; Nicolas Wentzensen; Herschel W Lawson; Mark H Einstein
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Prevalence of genital human papillomavirus among females in the United States, the National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003-2006.

Authors:  Susan Hariri; Elizabeth R Unger; Maya Sternberg; Eileen F Dunne; David Swan; Sonya Patel; Lauri E Markowitz
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Feasibility of Cervical Cancer Screening Utilizing Self-sample Human Papillomavirus Testing Among Mexican Immigrant Women in Harris County, Texas: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Jane R Montealegre; Patricia D Mullen; Maria L Jibaja-Weiss; Maria M Vargas Mendez; Michael E Scheurer
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2015-06

Review 8.  Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marc Arbyn; Freija Verdoodt; Peter J F Snijders; Viola M J Verhoef; Eero Suonio; Lena Dillner; Silvia Minozzi; Cristina Bellisario; Rita Banzi; Fang-Hui Zhao; Peter Hillemanns; Ahti Anttila
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Feasibility of community-based careHPV for cervical cancer prevention in rural Thailand.

Authors:  Lee A Trope; Bandit Chumworathayi; Paul D Blumenthal
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.925

10.  HPV infection among rural American Indian women and urban white women in South Dakota: an HPV prevalence study.

Authors:  Delf C Schmidt-Grimminger; Maria C Bell; Clemma J Muller; Diane M Maher; Subhash C Chauhan; Dedra S Buchwald
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 3.090

View more
  12 in total

1.  Acceptability of Self-Sample Human Papillomavirus Testing Among Thai Women Visiting a Colposcopy Clinic.

Authors:  Natacha Phoolcharoen; Nuttavut Kantathavorn; Wasanai Krisorakun; Chantanee Taepisitpong; Waraphorn Krongthong; Siriporn Saeloo
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2018-06

Review 2.  Variation in Cervical Cancer Screening Preferences among Medically Underserved Individuals in the United States: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Caitlin B Biddell; Meghan C O'Leary; Stephanie B Wheeler; Lisa P Spees
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Human Papillomavirus Prevalence Among American Indian Women of the Great Plains.

Authors:  Naomi R Lee; Rachel L Winer; Stephen Cherne; Carolyn J Noonan; Lonnie Nelson; Angela A Gonzales; Jason G Umans; Dedra Buchwald
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2019-02-23       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Acceptability and ease of use of mailed HPV self-collection among infrequently screened women in North Carolina.

Authors:  Chelsea Anderson; Lindsay Breithaupt; Andrea Des Marais; Charlotte Rastas; Alice Richman; Lynn Barclay; Noel T Brewer; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 3.519

5.  HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening: a systematic review of values and preferences.

Authors:  Holly Nishimura; Ping Teresa Yeh; Habibat Oguntade; Caitlin E Kennedy; Manjulaa Narasimhan
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2021-05

6.  Genital Tract Infections in an Isolated Community: 100 Women of the Príncipe Island.

Authors:  Pedro Vieira-Baptista; Svitrigaile Grinceviciene; Gert Bellen; Carlos Sousa; Conceição Saldanha; Davy Vanden Broeck; John-Paul Bogers; Gilbert Donders
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-11-13

Review 7.  Cancer Screening Interventions in Indigenous Populations: A Rapid Review.

Authors:  Janell Bryant; Kara Patterson; Marcus Vaska; Bonnie Chiang; Angeline Letendre; Lea Bill; Huiming Yang; Karen Kopciuk
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.677

8.  Self-administered versus provider-directed sampling in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study (ACCSS): a qualitative investigation with Canadian First Nations women.

Authors:  Ingeborg Zehbe; Pamela Wakewich; Amy-Dee King; Kyla Morrisseau; Candace Tuck
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Performance and acceptability of self-collected human papillomavirus testing among women living with HIV.

Authors:  Runzhi Wang; Kristen Lee; Charlotte A Gaydos; Jean Anderson; Jean Keller; Jenell Coleman
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  Uptake and acceptability of human papillomavirus self-sampling in rural and remote aboriginal communities: evaluation of a nurse-led community engagement model.

Authors:  Tegan Dutton; Jo Marjoram; Shellie Burgess; Laurinne Montgomery; Anne Vail; Nichole Callan; Sunil Jacob; David Hawkes; Marion Saville; Jannine Bailey
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.