Literature DB >> 22904932

(2S,4R)-4-Fluoro-pyrrolidinium-2-carboxyl-ate.

David B Hobart1, Joseph S Merola.   

Abstract

The crystal structure of the title compound, C(5)H(8)FNO(2), at 100 K, displays inter-molecular N-H⋯O hydrogen bonding between the ammonium and carboxyl-ate groups as a result of its zwitterionic nature in the solid state. The five-membered ring adopts an envelope conformation with the C atom at the 3-position as the flap. The compound is of inter-est with respect to the synthesis and structural properties of synthetic collagens. The absolute structure was determined by comparison with the commercially available material.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22904932      PMCID: PMC3414945          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812031741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the synthesis of the title compound, see: Gottlieb et al. (1965 ▶); Azad et al. (2012 ▶). For its applications and properties with respect to synthetic collagens, see: Hodges & Raines (2003 ▶, 2005 ▶); Holmgren et al. (1999 ▶); Kim et al. (2005 ▶); Mooney et al. (2002 ▶); Persikov et al. (2003 ▶); Raines (2005 ▶); Shoulders & Raines (2009 ▶); Shoulders et al. (2006 ▶); Takeuchi & Prockop (1969 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C5H8FNO2 M = 133.12 Orthorhombic, a = 7.6530 (6) Å b = 8.4128 (6) Å c = 8.6286 (6) Å V = 555.54 (7) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.14 mm−1 T = 100 K 0.26 × 0.05 × 0.03 mm

Data collection

Oxford Diffraction Gemini Ultra diffractometer Absorption correction: Gaussian (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2011 ▶) T min = 0.977, T max = 0.996 10227 measured reflections 959 independent reflections 832 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.082

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.038 wR(F 2) = 0.073 S = 1.07 959 reflections 114 parameters All H-atom parameters refined Δρmax = 0.32 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.23 e Å−3 Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2011 ▶); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO; data reduction: CrysAlis PRO; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: OLEX2. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812031741/im2392sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812031741/im2392Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812031741/im2392Isup3.cdx Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812031741/im2392Isup4.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report Enhanced figure: interactive version of Fig. 1
C5H8FNO2Dx = 1.592 Mg m3
Mr = 133.12Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, P212121Cell parameters from 1887 reflections
a = 7.6530 (6) Åθ = 3.6–30.0°
b = 8.4128 (6) ŵ = 0.14 mm1
c = 8.6286 (6) ÅT = 100 K
V = 555.54 (7) Å3Prism, clear light colourless
Z = 40.26 × 0.05 × 0.03 mm
F(000) = 280
Oxford Diffraction Gemini Ultra diffractometer959 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube, fine-focus sealed tube832 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.082
Detector resolution: 16.0122 pixels mm-1θmax = 30.1°, θmin = 3.6°
phi and ω scansh = −10→10
Absorption correction: gaussian (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2011)k = −11→11
Tmin = 0.977, Tmax = 0.996l = −12→12
10227 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.038Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.073All H-atom parameters refined
S = 1.07w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0203P)2 + 0.2288P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
959 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
114 parametersΔρmax = 0.32 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.23 e Å3
Experimental. Recrystallized from 50/50 acetone/water.Absorption correction: CrysAlisPro, Agilent Technologies, Version 1.171.34.49 (release 20-01-2011 CrysAlis171 .NET) (compiled Jan 20 2011,15:58:25) Numerical absorption correction based on gaussian integration over a multifaceted crystal model
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
F10.24111 (16)0.73474 (16)0.53792 (14)0.0194 (3)
O20.58809 (19)0.59578 (17)0.07960 (17)0.0143 (3)
O30.4982 (2)0.82996 (18)−0.01402 (17)0.0177 (3)
N60.2662 (2)0.8837 (2)0.2162 (2)0.0109 (3)
C40.3974 (3)0.7510 (2)0.2345 (2)0.0104 (4)
C50.5019 (3)0.7239 (2)0.0854 (2)0.0104 (4)
C70.1571 (3)0.6913 (3)0.3970 (2)0.0130 (4)
C80.1078 (3)0.8427 (3)0.3133 (2)0.0124 (4)
C90.2903 (3)0.6117 (3)0.2947 (2)0.0137 (4)
H40.480 (3)0.787 (3)0.317 (3)0.010 (6)*
H8A0.011 (3)0.822 (3)0.247 (3)0.013 (6)*
H70.056 (3)0.629 (3)0.424 (3)0.011 (6)*
H8B0.084 (3)0.927 (3)0.387 (3)0.008 (6)*
H9A0.233 (3)0.560 (3)0.208 (3)0.020 (7)*
H9B0.358 (3)0.540 (3)0.353 (3)0.022 (7)*
H6A0.231 (3)0.895 (3)0.115 (3)0.026 (7)*
H6B0.314 (3)0.975 (3)0.256 (3)0.020 (7)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
F10.0170 (6)0.0320 (8)0.0092 (6)0.0011 (6)0.0006 (5)0.0004 (5)
O20.0151 (7)0.0142 (7)0.0136 (7)0.0048 (6)0.0027 (6)0.0023 (6)
O30.0248 (8)0.0158 (7)0.0124 (7)0.0051 (7)0.0053 (7)0.0031 (6)
N60.0115 (8)0.0101 (8)0.0112 (8)0.0008 (7)0.0000 (7)−0.0014 (7)
C40.0110 (8)0.0110 (9)0.0091 (8)0.0004 (8)−0.0003 (7)−0.0002 (8)
C50.0094 (8)0.0113 (9)0.0106 (8)−0.0034 (8)0.0000 (7)−0.0015 (8)
C70.0119 (9)0.0158 (10)0.0114 (9)−0.0018 (8)0.0018 (8)−0.0003 (8)
C80.0106 (9)0.0153 (9)0.0112 (9)0.0017 (8)0.0007 (8)−0.0022 (8)
C90.0149 (10)0.0118 (9)0.0144 (10)0.0009 (8)0.0013 (8)0.0035 (9)
F1—C71.423 (2)C4—H41.00 (2)
O2—C51.265 (2)C7—C81.512 (3)
O3—C51.238 (2)C7—C91.505 (3)
N6—C41.509 (3)C7—H70.96 (2)
N6—C81.513 (3)C8—H8A0.95 (3)
N6—H6A0.91 (3)C8—H8B0.97 (2)
N6—H6B0.92 (3)C9—H9A0.97 (3)
C4—C51.532 (3)C9—H9B0.94 (3)
C4—C91.521 (3)
C4—N6—C8107.85 (15)F1—C7—H7107.3 (14)
C4—N6—H6A111.6 (17)C8—C7—H7111.6 (13)
C4—N6—H6B108.2 (15)C9—C7—C8105.27 (17)
C8—N6—H6A108.5 (17)C9—C7—H7116.6 (14)
C8—N6—H6B107.5 (15)N6—C8—H8A109.4 (15)
H6A—N6—H6B113 (2)N6—C8—H8B110.1 (13)
N6—C4—C5111.70 (16)C7—C8—N6104.86 (16)
N6—C4—C9104.28 (16)C7—C8—H8A109.3 (15)
N6—C4—H4105.8 (13)C7—C8—H8B110.5 (13)
C5—C4—H4108.2 (13)H8A—C8—H8B112.4 (19)
C9—C4—C5116.93 (17)C4—C9—H9A108.9 (15)
C9—C4—H4109.3 (13)C4—C9—H9B112.4 (15)
O2—C5—C4115.64 (17)C7—C9—C4102.86 (17)
O3—C5—O2126.79 (19)C7—C9—H9A110.3 (15)
O3—C5—C4117.53 (18)C7—C9—H9B110.2 (15)
F1—C7—C8107.72 (17)H9A—C9—H9B112 (2)
F1—C7—C9108.03 (17)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N6—H6B···O2i0.92 (3)1.90 (3)2.744 (2)152 (2)
N6—H6A···O2ii0.91 (3)2.01 (3)2.899 (2)164 (2)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N6—H6B⋯O2i 0.92 (3)1.90 (3)2.744 (2)152 (2)
N6—H6A⋯O2ii 0.91 (3)2.01 (3)2.899 (2)164 (2)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  10 in total

1.  Reciprocity of steric and stereoelectronic effects in the collagen triple helix.

Authors:  Matthew D Shoulders; Jonathan A Hodges; Ronald T Raines
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  A stereoelectronic effect on turn formation due to proline substitution in elastin-mimetic polypeptides.

Authors:  Wookhyun Kim; R Andrew McMillan; James P Snyder; Vincent P Conticello
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-12-28       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Biosynthesis of abnormal collagens with amino acid analogues. I. Incorporation of L-azetidine-2-carboxylic acid and cis-4-fluoro-L-proline into protocollagen and collagen.

Authors:  T Takeuchi; D J Prockop
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1969-02-04

5.  Stereoelectronic and steric effects in the collagen triple helix: toward a code for strand association.

Authors:  Jonathan A Hodges; Ronald T Raines
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  A hyperstable collagen mimic.

Authors:  S K Holmgren; L E Bretscher; K M Taylor; R T Raines
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  1999-02

7.  Conformational preferences of substituted prolines in the collagen triple helix.

Authors:  Sean D Mooney; Peter A Kollman; Teri E Klein
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2002-07-05       Impact factor: 2.505

8.  Triple-helix propensity of hydroxyproline and fluoroproline: comparison of host-guest and repeating tripeptide collagen models.

Authors:  Anton V Persikov; John A M Ramshaw; Alan Kirkpatrick; Barbara Brodsky
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2003-09-24       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Stereoelectronic effects on collagen stability: the dichotomy of 4-fluoroproline diastereomers.

Authors:  Jonathan A Hodges; Ronald T Raines
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Modulating collagen triple-helix stability with 4-chloro, 4-fluoro, and 4-methylprolines.

Authors:  Matthew D Shoulders; Ronald T Raines
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.622

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.