Literature DB >> 22902501

Early-stage epigenetic modification during somatic cell reprogramming by Parp1 and Tet2.

Claudia A Doege1, Keiichi Inoue, Toru Yamashita, David B Rhee, Skylar Travis, Ryousuke Fujita, Paolo Guarnieri, Govind Bhagat, William B Vanti, Alan Shih, Ross L Levine, Sara Nik, Emily I Chen, Asa Abeliovich.   

Abstract

Somatic cells can be reprogrammed into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) by using the pluripotency factors Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and c-Myc (together referred to as OSKM). iPSC reprogramming erases somatic epigenetic signatures—as typified by DNA methylation or histone modification at silent pluripotency loci—and establishes alternative epigenetic marks of embryonic stem cells (ESCs). Here we describe an early and essential stage of somatic cell reprogramming, preceding the induction of transcription at endogenous pluripotency loci such as Nanog and Esrrb. By day 4 after transduction with OSKM, two epigenetic modification factors necessary for iPSC generation, namely poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (Parp1) and ten-eleven translocation-2 (Tet2), are recruited to the Nanog and Esrrb loci. These epigenetic modification factors seem to have complementary roles in the establishment of early epigenetic marks during somatic cell reprogramming: Parp1 functions in the regulation of 5-methylcytosine (5mC) modification, whereas Tet2 is essential for the early generation of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) by the oxidation of 5mC (refs 3,4). Although 5hmC has been proposed to serve primarily as an intermediate in 5mC demethylation to cytosine in certain contexts, our data, and also studies of Tet2-mutant human tumour cells, argue in favour of a role for 5hmC as an epigenetic mark distinct from 5mC. Consistent with this, Parp1 and Tet2 are each needed for the early establishment of histone modifications that typify an activated chromatin state at pluripotency loci, whereas Parp1 induction further promotes accessibility to the Oct4 reprogramming factor. These findings suggest that Parp1 and Tet2 contribute to an epigenetic program that directs subsequent transcriptional induction at pluripotency loci during somatic cell reprogramming.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22902501      PMCID: PMC5176099          DOI: 10.1038/nature11333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  30 in total

1.  A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Bradley E Bernstein; Tarjei S Mikkelsen; Xiaohui Xie; Michael Kamal; Dana J Huebert; James Cuff; Ben Fry; Alex Meissner; Marius Wernig; Kathrin Plath; Rudolf Jaenisch; Alexandre Wagschal; Robert Feil; Stuart L Schreiber; Eric S Lander
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  TET1 and hydroxymethylcytosine in transcription and DNA methylation fidelity.

Authors:  Kristine Williams; Jesper Christensen; Marianne Terndrup Pedersen; Jens V Johansen; Paul A C Cloos; Juri Rappsilber; Kristian Helin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome.

Authors:  Nathaniel D Heintzman; Rhona K Stuart; Gary Hon; Yutao Fu; Christina W Ching; R David Hawkins; Leah O Barrera; Sara Van Calcar; Chunxu Qu; Keith A Ching; Wei Wang; Zhiping Weng; Roland D Green; Gregory E Crawford; Bing Ren
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-02-04       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Dissecting direct reprogramming through integrative genomic analysis.

Authors:  Tarjei S Mikkelsen; Jacob Hanna; Xiaolan Zhang; Manching Ku; Marius Wernig; Patrick Schorderet; Bradley E Bernstein; Rudolf Jaenisch; Eric S Lander; Alexander Meissner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Mbd3/NURD complex regulates expression of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine marked genes in embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Ozlem Yildirim; Ruowang Li; Jui-Hung Hung; Poshen B Chen; Xianjun Dong; Ly-Sha Ee; Zhiping Weng; Oliver J Rando; Thomas G Fazzio
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Tet1 and Tet2 regulate 5-hydroxymethylcytosine production and cell lineage specification in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Kian Peng Koh; Akiko Yabuuchi; Sridhar Rao; Yun Huang; Kerrianne Cunniff; Julie Nardone; Asta Laiho; Mamta Tahiliani; Cesar A Sommer; Gustavo Mostoslavsky; Riitta Lahesmaa; Stuart H Orkin; Scott J Rodig; George Q Daley; Anjana Rao
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 24.633

7.  Mice lacking ADPRT and poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation develop normally but are susceptible to skin disease.

Authors:  Z Q Wang; B Auer; L Stingl; H Berghammer; D Haidacher; M Schweiger; E F Wagner
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1995-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  The DNA binding and catalytic domains of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 cooperate in the regulation of chromatin structure and transcription.

Authors:  David A Wacker; Donald D Ruhl; Ehsan H Balagamwala; Kristine M Hope; Tong Zhang; W Lee Kraus
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Genome-wide reprogramming in the mouse germ line entails the base excision repair pathway.

Authors:  Petra Hajkova; Sean J Jeffries; Caroline Lee; Nigel Miller; Stephen P Jackson; M Azim Surani
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Dynamic single-cell imaging of direct reprogramming reveals an early specifying event.

Authors:  Zachary D Smith; Iftach Nachman; Aviv Regev; Alexander Meissner
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  167 in total

Review 1.  Effect of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Technology in Blood Banking.

Authors:  Daniele Focosi; Mauro Pistello
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 6.940

2.  "TET-on" pluripotency.

Authors:  Ping Wang; Jing Qu; Min-Zu Wu; Weizhou Zhang; Guang-Hui Liu; Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 25.617

Review 3.  Will brain cells derived from induced pluripotent stem cells or directly converted from somatic cells (iNs) be useful for schizophrenia research?

Authors:  Cheryl Filippich; Ernst J Wolvetang; Bryan J Mowry
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 4.  Chromatin changes in reprogramming of mammalian somatic cells.

Authors:  Rong Xu; Shiqiang Zhang; Anmin Lei
Journal:  Rejuvenation Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.663

Review 5.  Toward pluripotency by reprogramming: mechanisms and application.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Stephen T Warren; Peng Jin
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 14.870

Review 6.  Mechanisms underlying the formation of induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Federico González; Danwei Huangfu
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 5.814

Review 7.  Vitamin C in Stem Cell Reprogramming and Cancer.

Authors:  Luisa Cimmino; Benjamin G Neel; Iannis Aifantis
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 20.808

Review 8.  Epigenetics of reprogramming to induced pluripotency.

Authors:  Bernadett Papp; Kathrin Plath
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 9.  Breathing-in epigenetic change with vitamin C.

Authors:  Asun Monfort; Anton Wutz
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 10.  Epigenetic regulation of smooth muscle cell plasticity.

Authors:  Renjing Liu; Kristen L Leslie; Kathleen A Martin
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2014-06-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.