Literature DB >> 22902493

Novel surgical instruments facilitating Descemet membrane dissection.

Efdal Yoeruek1, Karl-Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt, Bartz Schmidt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To introduce 2 new untoothed curvilinear forceps for improved dissection of Descemet membrane (DM) and comparison with the 1-point forceps technique.
METHODS: DMs of 16 corneoscleral rims were separated using either 1-point forceps dissection (group A) or curvilinear forceps dissection (group B). Preparation time, handling, and endothelial cell quality were analyzed. Quantification of potential damage during the preparation was achieved by staining with a viability bioassay (calcein acetoxymethyl and ethidium homodimer-1) and 4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). The average of 5 different areas per DM was considered for endothelial cell death ratios (ethidium homodimer-1-positive cells vs. DAPI-positive cells).
RESULTS: In both groups, all prepared DMs were usable for transplantation. The duration of preparation was 11.0 minutes in group A and 6.4 minutes in group B, demonstrating that the new forceps is superior in this respect (P = 0.008). The average percentage of endothelial cell death ratios (ethidium homodimer-1-positive cells vs. DAPI-positive cells) was 7.2% ± 3.0% in group A and 3.4% ± 2.0% in group B. A significant difference was noted (P = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: By applying the curvilinear forceps technique, a reduced preparation time was noted. Also, final quality was higher as indicated by a significantly lower endothelial cell death ratio in group B. These technical features translate directly into both a low-level tissue wastage and a decreased preparation time with high tissue conservation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22902493     DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182588ae9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  8 in total

1.  Analysis of different types of anesthesia in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Annekatrin Rickmann; Christoph Andres; Karl Boden; Silke Wahl; Peter Szurman
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Evolving Techniques in Corneal Transplantation.

Authors:  Grace E Boynton; Maria A Woodward
Journal:  Curr Surg Rep       Date:  2015-02-01

3.  Safety analysis and results of a borosilicate glass cartridge for no-touch graft loading and injection in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Annekatrin Rickmann; Silke Wahl; Alisa Katsen-Globa; Peter Szurman
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Causes that influence the detachment rate after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  T Röck; M Bramkamp; K U Bartz-Schmidt; D Röck; E Yörük
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 5.  Eye-bank preparation of endothelial tissue.

Authors:  Grace E Boynton; Maria A Woodward
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.761

6.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in cases with existing scleral-sutured and iris-sutured intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Daniel Röck; Tobias Röck; Karl-Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt; Efdal Yoeruek
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 7.  Component corneal surgery: An update.

Authors:  Prafulla K Maharana; Pranita Sahay; Deepali Singhal; Itika Garg; Jeewan S Titiyal; Namrata Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.848

8.  Global cell-by-cell evaluation of endothelial viability after two methods of graft preparation in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Maninder Bhogal; Maria S Balda; Karl Matter; Bruce D Allan
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 4.638

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.