AIM: To assess the feasibility/accuracy of a commercial handheld device in the context of increased demand for point-of-care serum creatinine (SCr) determination. METHODS: In this institutional review board-approved, prospective study, 401 patients referred for contrast-enhanced computed tomography were included at two centres. Capillary (c)SCr was determined using two devices A+B and venous (v)SCr was determined in the centre's laboratory. Method comparison statistics for both centres and for vSCr<>1.2 mg/dL, receiver operating characteristic analysis, negative predictive values (NPV), sensitivity and specificity were calculated pre-/post-curve offset correction with vSCr. RESULTS: Pearson's coefficients for cSCr vs vSCr were: centre 1-A:0.93/B:0.92; centre 2-A:0.85/B:0.82 (all P < 0.0001). Overall correlation was better for vSCr > 1.2 mg/dL. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves showed a high accuracy for cSCr, but the device underestimated SCr, which was confirmed by Bland-Altman plot. Addition of the offset correction factor to the original data from centre 1 resulted in an improvement in sensitivity for detecting patients at risk (> 1.2 mg/dL), whilst maintaining acceptable specificity and improving NPV. CONCLUSION: This study showed the feasibility of SCr determination using the evaluated handheld device in a routine clinical setting. The device showed high sensitivity and high NPV, but may significantly underestimate SCr without offset correction to local laboratories.
AIM: To assess the feasibility/accuracy of a commercial handheld device in the context of increased demand for point-of-care serum creatinine (SCr) determination. METHODS: In this institutional review board-approved, prospective study, 401 patients referred for contrast-enhanced computed tomography were included at two centres. Capillary (c)SCr was determined using two devices A+B and venous (v)SCr was determined in the centre's laboratory. Method comparison statistics for both centres and for vSCr<>1.2 mg/dL, receiver operating characteristic analysis, negative predictive values (NPV), sensitivity and specificity were calculated pre-/post-curve offset correction with vSCr. RESULTS: Pearson's coefficients for cSCr vs vSCr were: centre 1-A:0.93/B:0.92; centre 2-A:0.85/B:0.82 (all P < 0.0001). Overall correlation was better for vSCr > 1.2 mg/dL. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves showed a high accuracy for cSCr, but the device underestimated SCr, which was confirmed by Bland-Altman plot. Addition of the offset correction factor to the original data from centre 1 resulted in an improvement in sensitivity for detecting patients at risk (> 1.2 mg/dL), whilst maintaining acceptable specificity and improving NPV. CONCLUSION: This study showed the feasibility of SCr determination using the evaluated handheld device in a routine clinical setting. The device showed high sensitivity and high NPV, but may significantly underestimate SCr without offset correction to local laboratories.
Entities:
Keywords:
Contrast-medium-induced nephropathy; Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis; Point of care testing; Serum creatinine determination; StatSensor
Authors: Peter A McCullough; Andy Adam; Christoph R Becker; Charles Davidson; Norbert Lameire; Fulvio Stacul; James Tumlin Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2006-02-10 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Marc J Schweiger; Charles E Chambers; Charles J Davidson; Shaoheng Zhang; James Blankenship; Narinder P Bhalla; Peter C Block; John P Dervan; Christine Gasperetti; Lowell Gerber; Neal S Kleiman; Ronald J Krone; William J Phillips; Robert M Siegel; Barry F Uretsky; Warren K Laskey Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Oghenekome Gbinigie; Christopher P Price; Carl Heneghan; Ann Van den Bruel; Annette Plüddemann Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Melissa Nataatmadja; Angela W S Fung; Beryl Jacobson; Jack Ferera; Eva Bernstein; Paul Komenda; Andre Mattman; David Seccombe; Adeera Levin Journal: Can J Kidney Health Dis Date: 2020-11-12
Authors: Mark Corbett; Ana Duarte; Alexis Llewellyn; James Altunkaya; Melissa Harden; Martine Harris; Simon Walker; Stephen Palmer; Sofia Dias; Marta Soares Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Anthony J Carden; Edgardo S Salcedo; Nam K Tran; Eric Gross; Jennifer Mattice; Jan Shepard; Joseph M Galante Journal: Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Date: 2016-07-12