| Literature DB >> 22899792 |
Lin Sen1, Mario Fares, Ying-Juan Su, Ting Wang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The photosynthetic oxygen-evolving photo system II (PS II) produces almost the entire oxygen in the atmosphere. This unique biochemical system comprises a functional core complex that is encoded by psbA and other genes. Unraveling the evolutionary dynamics of this gene is of particular interest owing to its direct role in oxygen production. psbA underwent gene duplication in leptosporangiates, in which both copies have been preserved since. Because gene duplication is often followed by the non-fictionalization of one of the copies and its subsequent erosion, preservation of both psbA copies pinpoint functional or regulatory specialization events. The aim of this study was to investigate the molecular evolution of psbA among fern lineages.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22899792 PMCID: PMC3499216 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-145
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Figure 1Detail phylogeny along with geological time-scale of 28 species. Relied on the combined matrix (dataset 6, Additional file 1 Table S3, Additional file 2), the phylogenetic tree of 28 investigated species was reconstructed via BEAST packages. 27 nodes were numbered and tagged respectively. Length of each branch was in accordance with the estimated divergence time. Estimated parameters of each branch were showed in Table 2. Specific orders mentioned in the text were marked in phylogeny and species names within different orders were illustrated under phylogenies.
Figure 2Summary estimated phylogeny against the accepted fern cladogram. Left phylogeny was inferred by combined matrix (dataset 6, Additional file 1 Table S3) via UCLD models, which is a summary structure of Figure 1. Right phylogeny is accepted fern cladogram based on several sources [33,34].
Plant materials and sampling locations in this study
| Polypodiales | Polypodiaceae | WBGCAS | JQ684679 | ||
| | | WBGCAS | JQ684680 | ||
| | Aspleniaceae | WBGCAS | JQ684681 | ||
| | Davalliaceae | WBGCAS | JQ684682 | ||
| | Lomariopsidaceae | WBGCAS | JQ684683 | ||
| Cyatheales | Cyatheaceae | WBGCAS | JQ684684 | ||
| | Cibotiaceae | WBGCAS | JQ684685 | ||
| | Plagiogyriaceae | FLBG | JQ684686 | ||
| | | WBGCAS | JQ684687 | ||
| Salviniales | Salviniaceae | FLBG | JQ684688 | ||
| Schizaeales | Lygodiaceae | FLBG | JQ684689 | ||
| Gleicheniales | Gleicheniaceae | FLBG | JQ684690 | ||
| | | FLBG | JQ684691 | ||
| | | WBGCAS | JQ684692 | ||
| Hymenophyllales | Hymenophyllaceae | WBGCAS | JQ684693 | ||
| Osmundales | Osmundaceae | SCBGCAS | JQ684694 | ||
| | | SCBGCAS | JQ684695 | ||
| Ophioglossales | Ophioglossaceae | SCBGCAS | JQ684696 | ||
| | | FLBG | JQ684697 | ||
| WBGCAS | JQ684698 |
*WBGCAS is short for Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei, China. FLBG stands for Shenzhen Fairy Lake Botanical Garden, Shenzhen, Guangdong,China. SCBGCAS means South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Selective pressures amonggene sequences examined via SLAC and FEL models
| One | SLAC | 0/22 | 0/78 | 0/103 | 0/137 | 0/141 | 1(4)/144 |
| FEL | 0/69 | 1(4)/126 | 1(4)/150 | 1(4)/171 | 1(4)/198 | 1(4)/210 | |
| Two | SLAC | 0/4 | 0/24 | 0/42 | 0/71 | 0/75 | 0/79 |
| FEL | 0/22 | 1(155)/56 | 2(155, 352)/81 | 3(4, 155, 352)/93 | 4(4, 155, 350, 352)/120 | 5(4, 53, 155, 350, 352)/139 | |
*The positions of positively selected codons were showed in brackets. p value stands for the statistical significant levels of the models, which is preset before the data manipulation.
** The contexts of the dataset were introduced in Additional file1Table S3.
The estimated parameters among phylogenetic tree via BEAST software
| 1 | 359.53 | 100 | Paleozoic | Mississippian |
| 2 | 299.9 | 100 | Paleozoic | Permian |
| 3 | 255.03 | 98.33 | Paleozoic | Permian |
| 4 | 191.39 | 100 | Mesozoic | Jurassic |
| 5 | 135.7 | 100 | Mesozoic | Cretaceous |
| 6 | 112.95 | 100 | Mesozoic | Cretaceous |
| 7 | 113.11 | 99.05 | Mesozoic | Cretaceous |
| 8 | 53.02 | 100 | Cenozoic | Paleogene |
| 9 | 23.38 | 100 | Cenozoic | Neogene |
| 10 | 133.94 | 99.81 | Mesozoic | Cretaceous |
| 11 | 189.57 | 93.15 | Mesozoic | Jurassic |
| 12 | 167.73 | 100 | Mesozoic | Jurassic |
| 13 | 159.5 | 99.91 | Mesozoic | Jurassic |
| 14 | 99.6 | 100 | Mesozoic | Cretaceous |
| 15 | 47.54 | 100 | Cenozoic | Paleogene |
| 16 | 146.76 | 100 | Mesozoic | Cretaceous |
| 17 | 145.45 | 100 | Mesozoic | Cretaceous |
| 18 | 144.76 | 100 | Mesozoic | Cretaceous |
| 19 | 135.12 | 83.86 | Mesozoic | Cretaceous |
| 20 | 117.2 | 47.62 | Mesozoic | Cretaceous |
| 21 | 113.65 | 68.39 | Mesozoic | Cretaceous |
| 22 | 111.6 | 100 | Mesozoic | Cretaceous |
| 23 | 105.41 | 100 | Mesozoic | Cretaceous |
| 24 | 93.51 | 100 | Mesozoic | Cretaceous |
| 25 | 93.48 | 100 | Mesozoic | Cretaceous |
| 26 | 69.86 | 100 | Cenozoic | Paleogene |
| 27 | 23.55 | 100 | Cenozoic | Neogene |
* As showed in Figure 1 and Figure 2, all the nodes in the phylogenetic tree were numbered and marked.
** Diverge time of each branch was estimated in BEAST software and listed accordingly. The geological time scale (era and period) were inferred from the estimated diverge time of each nodes.
*** Posterior probabilities (PP) of every node were inferred via BEAST. Four of them were lower than 95%: 1) node 11; 2) node 19; 3) node 20; and 4) node 21.
Parameter estimates and log-likelihood values under models of variableratios among codons
| Dataset one* | | | | | |
| M0: One ratio | 4.38 | 22 | -3906.05 | None | |
| M1a: Near neutral | 4.55 | 23 | -3858.84 | Not allowed | |
| M2a: Positive | 4.55 | 25 | -3858.83 | ||
| M3: Discrete | 4.60 | 26 | -3854.64 | ||
| M7: β | 4.48 | 23 | -3865.36 | Not allowed | |
| M8: β &ω > 1 | 4.53 | 25 | -3857.78 | ||
| Dataset two* | | | | | |
| M0: One ratio | 5.97 | 29 | -3093.72 | None | |
| M1a: Near neutral | 6.07 | 30 | -3061.96 | Not allowed | |
| M2a: Positive | 5.80 | 32 | -3061.96 | 347E (58.3%) | |
| M3: Discrete | 5.71 | 33 | -3060.47 | None | |
| M7: β | 5.75 | 30 | -3064.99 | Not allowed | |
| M8: β &ω > 1 | 5.80 | 32 | -3061.93 | 347E (81.6%), 349P (61.5%), 353 G (54.4%) | |
| Dataset three* | | | | | |
| M0: One ratio | 4.66 | 47 | -5742.02 | None | |
| M1a: Near neutral | 4.87 | 48 | -5654.74 | Not allowed | |
| M2a: Positive | 4.18 | 50 | -5656.81 | 71 L (72.4%), 91 L (78.0%) | |
| M3: Discrete | 4.90 | 51 | -5637.73 | ||
| M7: β | 4.78 | 48 | -5648.93 | Not allowed | |
| M8: β &ω > 1 | 5.09 | 50 | -5641.45 |
*The contexts of the dataset were introduced in Additional file1Table S3. Codons with PP > 95% were in bold. The phylogeny trees applied in the estimation were reconstructed throughout dataset introduced in Additional file1Table S3 accordingly.
**Positions and posterior probability of the positively selected codons were showed in this column. The posterior probabilities were given via Bayes Empirical Bayes (BEB) method.
Figure 3Selective pressures among 27 fernsequences via the MEC model. Results from Selecton for psbA gene were run on 27 fern sequences with the MEC model [42]. The codons were marked according to the sequence from Platycerium bifurcatum (JQ684679). Nearly neutral codons were colored in white, negatively selected in magenta, and positively selected in yellow, respectively. Most codons were nearly neutral or under negative selection, only three (155 T, 351 V and 353 G) were positively selected.
Co-evolution pairs with the D1 protein
| CAPS | 4 | 71 |
| Datamonkey*** | 19 | 350 |
| InterMap3D | 19 | 350 |
| 53 | 351 | |
| 4 | 351 | |
| 71 | 92 | |
| 4 | 352 | |
| 71 | 72 | |
| 72 | 281 | |
| 4 | 53 | |
| 72 | 351 | |
| 351 | 353 | |
*Three packages were applied in the current researches [46,47,73].
**Site1, Site 2: Coordinates of each of the interacting residues.
***Two kinds of molecules (two parents and one parent) were applied and gave the same pair.