Literature DB >> 22895691

Long-term survivorship and failure modes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Jared R H Foran1, Nicholas M Brown, Craig J Della Valle, Richard A Berger, Jorge O Galante.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In a previously reported series of 51 patients with 62 cemented, fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasties, we reported a 10-year, 98% survival rate with an average knee score of 92 points. The survivorship and modes of failure past 10 years are incompletely understood. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: At 15-year followup we sought to determine (1) the overall durability and survivorship of this design; (2) modes of failure; and (3) the progression of arthritis in the nonresurfaced compartments.
METHODS: Nineteen knees in 16 patients were available for study with 34 patients lost to death and one lost to followup. At 15 years, we analyzed the Kaplan-Meier survivorship as well as durability with regard to radiographic loosening and knee scores, determined modes of failure, and assessed radiographs for degeneration in the nonresurfaced compartments.
RESULTS: Fifteen-year survivorship was 93% and 20-year survivorship was 90%. Four of 62 knees were revised to total knee arthroplasty at a mean of 144 months. One knee was revised for patellofemoral and lateral compartment degeneration, one for lateral compartment degeneration, one for polyethylene disengagement and metallosis, and one for pain of unclear etiology. No patients had aseptic loosening or osteolysis. The mean knee score was 78 at latest followup. Arthritic progression in the nonresurfaced compartments was common although symptomatic in only two patients.
CONCLUSIONS: With this cemented, fixed-bearing design, the failure rates were low, there were no cases of failure secondary to wear or loosening, and the survivorship was similar to that reported for total knee arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22895691      PMCID: PMC3528926          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2517-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  40 in total

1.  Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series.

Authors:  U C Svärd; A J Price
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-03

2.  Medial unicompartmental arthroplasty after failed high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  J L Rees; A J Price; T G Lynskey; U C Svärd; C A Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-09

3.  Fifteen-year to 19-year follow-up of the Insall-Burstein-1 total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ayesha R Abdeen; Stacy R Collen; Stacy B Collen; Kelly G Vince
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup.

Authors:  R A Berger; D D Nedeff; R M Barden; M M Sheinkop; J J Jacobs; A G Rosenberg; J O Galante
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Unicompartmental knee replacement. A minimum 15 year followup study.

Authors:  M W Squire; J J Callaghan; D D Goetz; P M Sullivan; R C Johnston
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Long-term clinical results of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Numa Mercier; Simon Wimsey; Dominique Saragaglia
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Comparison of survival and cost-effectiveness between unicondylar arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in patients with primary osteoarthritis: a follow-up study of 50,493 knee replacements from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Esa Koskinen; Antti Eskelinen; Pekka Paavolainen; Pekka Pulkkinen; Ville Remes
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Marmor modular knee in unicompartmental disease. Minimum four-year follow-up.

Authors:  L Marmor
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Fifteen-year survival and osteolysis associated with a modular posterior stabilized knee replacement. A concise follow-up of a previous report.

Authors:  Paul F Lachiewicz; Elizabeth S Soileau
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Medial unicompartmental knee replacement in the under-50s.

Authors:  S Parratte; J-N A Argenson; O Pearce; V Pauly; P Auquier; J-M Aubaniac
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-03
View more
  37 in total

1.  Tibial baseplate positioning in robotic-assisted and conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Katherine P MacCallum; Jonathan R Danoff; Jeffrey A Geller
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-10-06

2.  Unicompartmental arthritis in the aging athlete: osteotomy and beyond.

Authors:  Stephen F Johnstone; Michael J Tranovich; Dharmesh Vyas; Vonda J Wright
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-09

3.  Onlay tibial implants appear to provide superior clinical results in robotic unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brian P Gladnick; Denis Nam; Saker Khamaisy; Sophia Paul; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2014-11-15

4.  Up to twelve year follow-up of the Oxford phase three unicompartmental knee replacement in China: seven hundred and eight knees from an independent centre.

Authors:  Huaming Xue; Yihui Tu; Tong Ma; Tao Wen; Tao Yang; Minwei Cai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Fixed- versus mobile-bearing UKA: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Geert Peersman; Bart Stuyts; Tom Vandenlangenbergh; Philippe Cartier; Peter Fennema
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  [Revision after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  G Mohr; J Martin; M Clarius
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Common causes of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a single-centre analysis of four hundred and seventy one cases.

Authors:  Mustafa Citak; Kathrin Dersch; Atul F Kamath; Carl Haasper; Thorsten Gehrke; Daniel Kendoff
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Rehabilitation outcomes following revision for failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wei Sheng Foong; Ngai Nung Lo
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2014-07-26

Review 9.  Metallosis after traumatic loosening of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Chih-Chan Yang; Chien-Lun Tang; Chung-Yuh Tzeng; Hsi-Kai Tsou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  [Modern unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Tips and tricks].

Authors:  F von Knoch; U Munzinger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.