Literature DB >> 11603518

Medial unicompartmental arthroplasty after failed high tibial osteotomy.

J L Rees1, A J Price, T G Lynskey, U C Svärd, C A Dodd, D W Murray.   

Abstract

Satisfactory selection criteria are essential for the successful outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UCA). We report the frequency of revision of the Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty in knees previously treated for anteromedial osteoarthritis by high tibial osteotomy (HTO). The combined results from three sources were used to allow statistical analysis of this uncommon subgroup. In the combined series of 631 knees (507 patients) which had medial unicompartmental replacement, 613 were primary procedures and 18 were for a failed HTO. The mean follow-up times of the two groups were similar (5.8 years and 5.4 years, respectively). At review, 19 (3.1%) of the primary procedures and five (27.8%) of those undertaken for a failed HTO had been revised to total knee replacement. Survival analysis revealed the ten-year cumulative survivals to be 96% and 66%, respectively. The log-rank comparison of these survivals revealed a highly significant difference (p < 0.0001). We recommend that the Oxford UCA should not be used in knees which have previously undergone an HTO.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11603518     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.83b7.11827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  8 in total

1.  The Oxford unicompartmental knee prosthesis: an independent 10-year survival analysis.

Authors:  Peter Vorlat; Guy Putzeys; Dominique Cottenie; Tom Van Isacker; Nicole Pouliart; Frank Handelberg; Pierre-Paul Casteleyn; Filip Gheysen; René Verdonk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-05-14       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  [Is computer navigation a useful tool in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A pilot cadaver study].

Authors:  P R Aldinger; H S Gill; U Schlegel; M Schneider; M Clauss; J W Goodfellow; D W Murray; S J Breusch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Long-term survivorship and failure modes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jared R H Foran; Nicholas M Brown; Craig J Della Valle; Richard A Berger; Jorge O Galante
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Surgical options for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  Jörg Lützner; Philip Kasten; Klaus-Peter Günther; Stephan Kirschner
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 20.543

5.  Oxford Phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: medium-term results of a minimally invasive surgical procedure.

Authors:  Lukas A Lisowski; Michel P J van den Bekerom; Peter Pilot; C Niek van Dijk; Andrzej E Lisowski
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Additional distal femoral osteotomy for insufficient correction after high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Ryuichi Nakamura; Kazunari Kuroda; Masaki Takahashi; Yasuo Katsuki
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2018-08-27

7.  Around-knee osteotomy conversion for failed high tibial osteotomy: Re-correction high tibial osteotomy and additional distal femoral osteotomy may enable return to sporting activities.

Authors:  Ryuichi Nakamura; Masaki Takahashi; Tomoyuki Shimakawa; Kazunari Kuroda; Yasuo Katsuki; Akira Okano
Journal:  Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol       Date:  2022-09-08

Review 8.  Medial unicompartmental knee replacement is a viable treatment option after failed high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Claudio Legnani; Andrea Parente; Franco Parente; Alberto Ventura
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-08-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.