Literature DB >> 22894444

Monte Carlo study of in-field and out-of-field dose distributions from a linear accelerator operating with and without a flattening-filter.

S S Almberg1, J Frengen, T Lindmo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare dosimetric characteristics of 6 MV photon fields originating from a linear accelerator operating with (FF) and without (FFF) a flattening-filter. The main objective is to establish a FFF model that results in similar depth-dose and build-up profiles as the original FF model, and subsequently estimate and compare out-of-field dose distributions.
METHODS: The EGSnrc Monte Carlo user codes BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc are used for photon beam simulations of an Elekta linear accelerator and dose calculations in a water phantom, respectively. Three beam models were analyzed: (1) the conventional linear accelerator with the flattening-filter in place and incident electron energy 6.45 MeV (FF 6.45 MeV), (2) similar flattening-filter-free model (FFF 6.45 MeV), and (3) as (2) but with increased electron energy (FFF 8.0 MeV). The field size 5 × 5 cm(2) was used for characterization of dose output, depth dose profiles, and photon spectrum. The field size 40 × 40 cm(2) was used for characterization of cross-field photon energy, photon fluence, and dose distributions. Out-of-field dose distributions were analyzed in both in-plane and cross-plane directions for 5 × 5 cm(2) and 10 × 10 cm(2) fields.
RESULTS: Comparable depth dose distributions, including the build-up region, for FF and FFF fields were achieved by increasing the electron energy from 6.45 MeV to 8.0 MeV for the FFF beam. The FFF beams result in reduced out-of-field dose compared to the FF beam: the reduction was most apparent in the cross-plane direction and more pronounced by the FFF 8.0 MeV beam compared to the FFF 6.45 MeV beam. Differences in out-of-field dose due to direction (in-plane vs cross-plane) were up to 40% for the FF beam; this effect was significantly reduced for the FFF beams. As the flattening-filter is a major source of contaminating electrons, superficial out-of-field dose was expected, and was found to be, reduced for FFF beams.
CONCLUSIONS: The build-up and depth-dose characteristics of a conventional "6 MV" beam can be maintained when changing to a flattening-filter-free modality by increasing the incident electron energy from 6.45 MeV to 8.0 MeV. This will at the same time reduce the out-of-field dose for regions up to 20 cm from the central axis by 10%-30% compared to the original FF situation.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22894444     DOI: 10.1118/1.4738963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  9 in total

1.  Technical Report: Evaluation of peripheral dose for flattening filter free photon beams.

Authors:  E L Covington; T A Ritter; J M Moran; A M Owrangi; J I Prisciandaro
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Monte Carlo simulation of beam characteristics from small fields based on TrueBeam flattening-filter-free mode.

Authors:  Zhongsu Feng; Haizhen Yue; Yibao Zhang; Hao Wu; Jinsheng Cheng; Xu Su
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 3.481

3.  Flattening filter-free accelerators: a report from the AAPM Therapy Emerging Technology Assessment Work Group.

Authors:  Ying Xiao; Stephen F Kry; Richard Popple; Ellen Yorke; Niko Papanikolaou; Sotirios Stathakis; Ping Xia; Saiful Huq; John Bayouth; James Galvin; Fang-Fang Yin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Study of dosimetric properties of flattened and unflattened megavoltage x ray beam on high Z implant materials.

Authors:  Tamilarasan Rajamanickam; Sivakumar Muthu; Perumal Murugan; Muddappa Pathokonda; Krishnamoorthy Senthilnathan; Narayanasamy Arunai Nambi Raj; Padmanabhan Ramesh Babu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) radiation therapy of right sided breast cancer with and without flattening filter - A treatment planning study.

Authors:  Johannes Maier; Bernadette Knott; Manuel Maerz; Rainer Loeschel; Oliver Koelbl; Barbara Dobler
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Re-irradiating spinal column metastases using IMRT and VMAT with and without flattening filter - a treatment planning study.

Authors:  Barbara Dobler; Amine Khemissi; Tina Obermeier; Matthias G Hautmann; Zaira Katsilieri; Oliver Kölbl
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Revisiting fetal dose during radiation therapy: evaluating treatment techniques and a custom shield.

Authors:  Amir M Owrangi; Donald A Roberts; Elizabeth L Covington; James A Hayman; Kathryn M Masi; Choonik Lee; Jean M Moran; Joann I Prisciandaro
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Estimating the uncertainty of calculated out-of-field organ dose from a commercial treatment planning system.

Authors:  Lilie Wang; George X Ding
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Benchmarking of electron beam parameters based on Monte Carlo linear accelerator simulation.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Mi Zhou; Jing Liu; Lu Yue; Lihua Deng; Zhijian Xu; Gang Wang
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.