Literature DB >> 7421164

Frequency selectivity in normally-hearing and hearing-impaired observers.

M Florentine, S Buus, B Scharf, E Zwicker.   

Abstract

This study compares frequency selectivity--as measured by four different methods--in observers with normal hearing and in observers with conductive (nonotosclerotic), otosclerotic, noise-induced, or degenerative hearing losses. Each category of loss was represented by a group of 7 to 10 observers, who were tested at center frequencies of 500 Hz and 4000 Hz. For each group, the following four measurements were made: psychoacoustical tuning curves, narrow-band masking, two-tone masking, and loudness summation. Results showed that (a) frequency selectivity was reduced at frequencies where a cochlear hearing loss was present, (b) frequency selectivity was reduced regardless of the test level at which normally-hearing observers and observers with cochlear impairment were compared, (c) all four measures of frequency selectivity were significantly correlated and (d) reduced frequency selectivity was positively correlated with the amount of cochlear hearing loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7421164     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.2303.646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  37 in total

1.  Correction of the peripheral spatiotemporal response pattern: a potential new signal-processing strategy.

Authors:  Lu-Feng Shi; Laurel H Carney; Karen A Doherty
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Discrimination of the spectral structures of sound signals on the background of interference.

Authors:  A Ya Supin
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-07-08

3.  Intra- versus intermodal integration in young and older adults.

Authors:  Brent P Spehar; Nancy Tye-Murray; Mitchell S Sommers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-07

5.  Asynchronous glimpsing of speech: spread of masking and task set-size.

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Curriculum for graduate courses in amplification.

Authors:  C V Palmer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1998-03

7.  A neural basis of speech-in-noise perception in older adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Han-Gyol Yi; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Effects of hearing loss on the subcortical representation of speech cues.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Travis White-Schwoch; Sarah Drehobl; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Auditory filter tuning inferred with short sinusoidal and notched-noise maskers.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Linking anatomical and physiological markers of auditory system degeneration with behavioral hearing assessments in a mouse (Mus musculus) model of age-related hearing loss.

Authors:  Anastasiya Kobrina; Katrina M Schrode; Laurel A Screven; Hamad Javaid; Madison M Weinberg; Garrett Brown; Ryleigh Board; Dillan F Villavisanis; Micheal L Dent; Amanda M Lauer
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 4.673

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.