Literature DB >> 22893711

Myocardial perfusion: near-automated evaluation from contrast-enhanced MR images obtained at rest and during vasodilator stress.

Giacomo Tarroni1, Cristiana Corsi, Patrick F Antkowiak, Federico Veronesi, Christopher M Kramer, Frederick H Epstein, James Walter, Claudio Lamberti, Roberto M Lang, Victor Mor-Avi, Amit R Patel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop and validate a technique for near-automated definition of myocardial regions of interest suitable for perfusion evaluation during vasodilator stress cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved the study protocol, and all patients provided informed consent. Image noise density distribution was used as a basis for endocardial and epicardial border detection combined with nonrigid registration. This method was tested in 42 patients undergoing contrast material-enhanced cardiac MR imaging (at 1.5 T) at rest and during vasodilator (adenosine or regadenoson) stress, including 15 subjects with normal myocardial perfusion and 27 patients referred for coronary angiography. Contrast enhancement-time curves were near-automatically generated and were used to calculate perfusion indexes. The results were compared with results of conventional manual analysis, using quantitative coronary angiography results as a reference for stenosis greater than 50%. Statistical analyses included the Student t test, linear regression, Bland-Altman analysis, and κ statistics.
RESULTS: Analysis of one sequence required less than 1 minute and resulted in high-quality contrast enhancement curves both at rest and stress (mean signal-to-noise ratios, 17±7 [standard deviation] and 22±8, respectively), showing expected patterns of first-pass perfusion. Perfusion indexes accurately depicted stress-induced hyperemia (increased upslope, from 6.7 sec(-1)±2.3 to 15.6 sec(-1)±5.9; P<.0001). Measured segmental pixel intensities correlated highly with results of manual analysis (r=0.95). The derived perfusion indexes also correlated highly with (r up to 0.94) and showed the same diagnostic accuracy as manual analysis (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, up to 0.72 vs 0.73).
CONCLUSION: Despite the dynamic nature of contrast-enhanced image sequences and respiratory motion, fast near-automated detection of myocardial segments and accurate quantification of tissue contrast is feasible at rest and during vasodilator stress. This technique, shown to be as accurate as conventional manual analysis, allows detection of stress-induced perfusion abnormalities. © RSNA, 2012

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22893711      PMCID: PMC3480816          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12112475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  28 in total

1.  Improvement of myocardial perfusion reserve early after coronary intervention: assessment with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  N Al-Saadi; E Nagel; M Gross; B Schnackenburg; I Paetsch; C Klein; E Fleck
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Improvement in the quantification of myocardial perfusion using an automatic spline-based registration algorithm.

Authors:  Christophe Dornier; Marko K Ivancevic; Philippe Thévenaz; Jean-Paul Vallée
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Absolute myocardial perfusion in canines measured by using dual-bolus first-pass MR imaging.

Authors:  Timothy F Christian; Dan W Rettmann; Anthony H Aletras; Steve L Liao; Joni L Taylor; Robert S Balaban; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Fully automatic registration and segmentation of first-pass myocardial perfusion MR image sequences.

Authors:  Vikas Gupta; Emile A Hendriks; Julien Milles; Rob J van der Geest; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Johan H C Reiber; Boudewijn P F Lelieveldt
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Improved coverage in dynamic contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI using interleaved gradient-echo EPI.

Authors:  S Ding; S D Wolff; F H Epstein
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Image processing via level set curvature flow.

Authors:  R Malladi; J A Sethian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Magnetic resonance quantification of the myocardial perfusion reserve with a Fermi function model for constrained deconvolution.

Authors:  M Jerosch-Herold; N Wilke; A E Stillman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Assessment of coronary flow reserve: comparison between contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Tareq Ibrahim; Stephan G Nekolla; Karin Schreiber; Kenichi Odaka; Stefan Volz; Julinda Mehilli; Martin Güthlin; Wolfram Delius; Markus Schwaiger
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-03-06       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Relation between myocardial blood flow and the severity of coronary-artery stenosis.

Authors:  N G Uren; J A Melin; B De Bruyne; W Wijns; T Baudhuin; P G Camici
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-06-23       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Advances in stress cardiac MRI and computed tomography.

Authors:  Yasmin S Hamirani; Christopher M Kramer
Journal:  Future Cardiol       Date:  2013-09

2.  Semi-quantitative myocardial perfusion MRI in heart transplant recipients at rest: repeatability in healthy controls and assessment of cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

Authors:  Travis B DeSa; Muhannad A Abbasi; Julie A Blaisdell; Kai Lin; Jeremy D Collins; James C Carr; Michael Markl
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 1.605

Review 3.  Cardiac imaging: working towards fully-automated machine analysis & interpretation.

Authors:  Piotr J Slomka; Damini Dey; Arkadiusz Sitek; Manish Motwani; Daniel S Berman; Guido Germano
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.166

Review 4.  Myocardial perfusion imaging with cardiac computed tomography: state of the art.

Authors:  Amit R Patel; Nicole M Bhave; Victor Mor-Avi
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 5.  Role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in assessment of acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Shah M Azarisman; Karen S Teo; Matthew I Worthley; Stephen G Worthley
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-06-26

Review 6.  Cardiac MRI assessment of myocardial perfusion.

Authors:  Yasmin S Hamirani; Christopher M Kramer
Journal:  Future Cardiol       Date:  2014-05

7.  Assessment of perfusion and wall-motion abnormalities and transient ischemic dilation in regadenoson stress cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Mohammad R Hojjati; Raja Muthupillai; James M Wilson; Ourania A Preventza; Benjamin Y C Cheong
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 8.  Imaging, Health Record, and Artificial Intelligence: Hype or Hope?

Authors:  Marco Mazzanti; Ervina Shirka; Hortensia Gjergo; Endri Hasimi
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  A fast, noniterative approach for accelerated high-temporal resolution cine-CMR using dynamically interleaved streak removal in the power-spectral encoded domain with low-pass filtering (DISPEL) and modulo-prime spokes (MoPS).

Authors:  Keigo Kawaji; Mita B Patel; Charles G Cantrell; Akiko Tanaka; Marco Marino; Satoshi Tamura; Hui Wang; Yi Wang; Timothy J Carroll; Takeyoshi Ota; Amit R Patel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Safety and tolerability of regadenoson in comparison with adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Data from a multicentre prospective registry.

Authors:  Jose V Monmeneu Menadas; Maria P García Gonzalez; Maria P Lopez-Lereu; Laura Higueras Ortega; Alicia M Maceira Gonzalez
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.