Literature DB >> 34331614

Safety and tolerability of regadenoson in comparison with adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Data from a multicentre prospective registry.

Jose V Monmeneu Menadas1, Maria P García Gonzalez2, Maria P Lopez-Lereu2, Laura Higueras Ortega2, Alicia M Maceira Gonzalez2.   

Abstract

To assess the feasibility and incidence of immediate complications of stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) with regadenoson in comparison with adenosine in a large referral population. This is a large, multicenter, prospective registry of vasodilator stress-CMR in a referral population. We recorded the clinical and demographic data, quality of test, CMR findings, hemodynamic data, and complications. Between January 2016 and July 2019, 2908 patients underwent stress-CMR, 2253 with regadenoson and 655 with adenosine. 25.1% of patients had previously known coronary artery disease (CAD). In 305 patients regadenoson was used due to presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma, while in 1948 subjects regadenoson was used as first-line vasodilator. Quality was optimal in 90.0%, suboptimal in 9.5%, and poor in 0.5%. Images were diagnostic in 98.9%. After stress with regadenoson, aminophylline 200 mg was administered intravenously in all patients. No patient died or had severe immediate complications with regadenoson as opposed to 2 severe bronchospasm with adenosine (p = 0.05). 11 patients (0.5%) had non-severe complications with regadenoson and five patients (0.8%) with adenosine (p = n.s.). Only two patients (0.088%) had non-severe bronchospasm after regadenoson administration. All complications were solved in the CMR unit, with no need for further specific care. Factors significantly associated with presence of complications were history of COPD or asthma and detection of inducible ischaemia. Patients had significantly more minor symptoms when adenosine was used (66.0% vs. 18.4%, p < 0.0001). Stress-CMR with regadenoson is feasible, providing diagnostic information in a referral population. Regadenoson had an excellent safety profile and better tolerability than adenosine, with no serious immediate complications and low incidence of non-severe complications. Only inducible ischaemia and previous history of COPD or asthma were associated with complications after regadenoson-CMR. The incidence of minor symptoms was low.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; Feasibility; Regadenoson; Registry; Safety

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34331614     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-021-02363-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  37 in total

1.  Initial clinical experience with regadenoson, a novel selective A2A agonist for pharmacologic stress single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Robert C Hendel; Timothy M Bateman; Manuel D Cerqueira; Ami E Iskandrian; Jeffrey A Leppo; Brent Blackburn; John J Mahmarian
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  The performance of non-invasive tests to rule-in and rule-out significant coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable angina: a meta-analysis focused on post-test disease probability.

Authors:  Juhani Knuuti; Haitham Ballo; Luis Eduardo Juarez-Orozco; Antti Saraste; Philippe Kolh; Anne Wilhelmina Saskia Rutjes; Peter Jüni; Stephan Windecker; Jeroen J Bax; William Wijns
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  ASNC imaging guidelines for SPECT nuclear cardiology procedures: Stress, protocols, and tracers.

Authors:  Milena J Henzlova; W Lane Duvall; Andrew J Einstein; Mark I Travin; Hein J Verberne
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Juhani Knuuti; William Wijns; Antti Saraste; Davide Capodanno; Emanuele Barbato; Christian Funck-Brentano; Eva Prescott; Robert F Storey; Christi Deaton; Thomas Cuisset; Stefan Agewall; Kenneth Dickstein; Thor Edvardsen; Javier Escaned; Bernard J Gersh; Pavel Svitil; Martine Gilard; David Hasdai; Robert Hatala; Felix Mahfoud; Josep Masip; Claudio Muneretto; Marco Valgimigli; Stephan Achenbach; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Prognostic implications of dipyridamole cardiac MR imaging: a prospective multicenter registry.

Authors:  Vicente Bodi; Oliver Husser; Juan Sanchis; Julio Núñez; José V Monmeneu; María P López-Lereu; María J Bosch; Eva Rumiz; Gema Miñana; Carlos García; José L Diago; Fabián Chaustre; David Moratal; Cristina Gómez; José Aguilar; Francisco J Chorro; Angel Llacer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance stress tests: adenosine stress perfusion and dobutamine stress wall motion imaging.

Authors:  Cosima Jahnke; Eike Nagel; Rolf Gebker; Thomas Kokocinski; Sebastian Kelle; Robert Manka; Eckart Fleck; Ingo Paetsch
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Safety and tolerability of regadenoson for myocardial perfusion imaging - first Danish experience.

Authors:  Marianne Pape; Helle D Zacho; Jens Aarøe; Svend Eggert Jensen; Lars J Petersen
Journal:  Scand Cardiovasc J       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 1.589

Review 8.  Regadenoson: a new myocardial stress agent.

Authors:  Wael Al Jaroudi; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Magnetic Resonance Perfusion or Fractional Flow Reserve in Coronary Disease.

Authors:  Eike Nagel; John P Greenwood; Gerry P McCann; Nuno Bettencourt; Ajay M Shah; Shazia T Hussain; Divaka Perera; Sven Plein; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Matthias Paul; Mark A Westwood; Michael Marber; Wolf-Stefan Richter; Valentina O Puntmann; Carsten Schwenke; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Rajiv Das; Joyce Wong; Derek J Hausenloy; Henning Steen; Colin Berry
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial.

Authors:  John P Greenwood; Neil Maredia; John F Younger; Julia M Brown; Jane Nixon; Colin C Everett; Petra Bijsterveld; John P Ridgway; Aleksandra Radjenovic; Catherine J Dickinson; Stephen G Ball; Sven Plein
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.