BACKGROUND: Whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is a promising method for noninvasive, radiation-free detection and exclusion of obstructive coronary artery disease; however, the required imaging time and robustness of the technique are not yet satisfactory. We evaluated the value of whole-heart coronary MRA at 3.0T using a 32-channel cardiac coil, which reduces image-acquisition times and hence allows to increase the clinical throughput. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 110 consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease referred for clinically indicated conventional coronary angiography were included in this prospective study. Acquisition of 3.0T coronary MRA data was done by using 32-channel receiver coils. An ECG-triggered, navigator-gated, inversion-recovery prepared, segmented gradient-echo sequence was used for image acquisition with an acceleration factor of 3 in the phase-encoding direction using generalized auto calibrating partially parallel acquisitions reconstruction. Acquisition of coronary MRA was successfully completed in 101 of 110 (92%) patients with average imaging time of 7.0±1.8 minutes. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of coronary MRA on a patient-based analysis were 95.9% (47/49, 95% CI, 86.0%-99.4%), 86.5% (45/52, 95% CI, 74.2%-94.4%), 87.0% (47/54, 95% CI, 75.1%-94.6%) and 95.7% (45/47, 95% CI, 85.4%-99.4%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Whole-heart coronary MRA at 3.0T using a 32-channel cardiac coil allows high overall accuracy for detecting significant coronary artery disease with reduced imaging time. It has potential to be a robust and alternative technique for ruling out significant coronary artery disease. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.chictr.org. Unique identifier: ChiCTR-DDT-07000121.
BACKGROUND: Whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is a promising method for noninvasive, radiation-free detection and exclusion of obstructive coronary artery disease; however, the required imaging time and robustness of the technique are not yet satisfactory. We evaluated the value of whole-heart coronary MRA at 3.0T using a 32-channel cardiac coil, which reduces image-acquisition times and hence allows to increase the clinical throughput. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 110 consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease referred for clinically indicated conventional coronary angiography were included in this prospective study. Acquisition of 3.0T coronary MRA data was done by using 32-channel receiver coils. An ECG-triggered, navigator-gated, inversion-recovery prepared, segmented gradient-echo sequence was used for image acquisition with an acceleration factor of 3 in the phase-encoding direction using generalized auto calibrating partially parallel acquisitions reconstruction. Acquisition of coronary MRA was successfully completed in 101 of 110 (92%) patients with average imaging time of 7.0±1.8 minutes. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of coronary MRA on a patient-based analysis were 95.9% (47/49, 95% CI, 86.0%-99.4%), 86.5% (45/52, 95% CI, 74.2%-94.4%), 87.0% (47/54, 95% CI, 75.1%-94.6%) and 95.7% (45/47, 95% CI, 85.4%-99.4%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Whole-heart coronary MRA at 3.0T using a 32-channel cardiac coil allows high overall accuracy for detecting significant coronary artery disease with reduced imaging time. It has potential to be a robust and alternative technique for ruling out significant coronary artery disease. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.chictr.org. Unique identifier: ChiCTR-DDT-07000121.
Authors: Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: W Y Kim; P G Danias; M Stuber; S D Flamm; S Plein; E Nagel; S E Langerak; O M Weber; E M Pedersen; M Schmidt; R M Botnar; W J Manning Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-12-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: N Al-Saadi; E Nagel; M Gross; A Bornstedt; B Schnackenburg; C Klein; W Klimek; H Oswald; E Fleck Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-03-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jonathan R Panting; Peter D Gatehouse; Guang-Zhong Yang; Frank Grothues; David N Firmin; Peter Collins; Dudley J Pennell Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-06-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Matthias Stuber; René M Botnar; Stefan E Fischer; Rolf Lamerichs; Jouke Smink; Paul Harvey; Warren J Manning Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Giovanni Di Leo; Erica Fisci; Francesco Secchi; Marco Alì; Federico Ambrogi; Luca Maria Sconfienza; Francesco Sardanelli Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-12-11 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: David P Ripley; Manish Motwani; Julia M Brown; Jane Nixon; Colin C Everett; Petra Bijsterveld; Neil Maredia; Sven Plein; John P Greenwood Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Jason M Tarkin; Marc R Dweck; Nicholas R Evans; Richard A P Takx; Adam J Brown; Ahmed Tawakol; Zahi A Fayad; James H F Rudd Journal: Circ Res Date: 2016-02-19 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Jessica Lohrke; Thomas Frenzel; Jan Endrikat; Filipe Caseiro Alves; Thomas M Grist; Meng Law; Jeong Min Lee; Tim Leiner; Kun-Cheng Li; Konstantin Nikolaou; Martin R Prince; Hans H Schild; Jeffrey C Weinreb; Kohki Yoshikawa; Hubertus Pietsch Journal: Adv Ther Date: 2016-01-25 Impact factor: 3.845