Literature DB >> 25916321

Integrated cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with coronary magnetic resonance angiography, stress-perfusion, and delayed-enhancement imaging for the detection of occult coronary artery disease in asymptomatic individuals.

Kyoung Doo Song1, Sung Mok Kim, Yeon Hyeon Choe, Wooin Jung, Sang-Chol Lee, Sung-A Chang, Yoon Ho Choi, Jidong Sung.   

Abstract

To evaluate the feasibility of using coronary magnetic resonance angiography (CMRA) with stress-perfusion and delayed-enhancement MRI as a screening tool for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) in asymptomatic subjects. Three hundred and forty-one self-referred asymptomatic subjects were enrolled in this study. Cardiac MR imaging was performed using a 1.5-T scanner with a 32-channel cardiac coil. Coronary artery stenosis, regional wall motion abnormalities, myocardial perfusion abnormalities, and delayed myocardial enhancement were analyzed. The occurrence of new chest pain and cardiac events was assessed in 332 subjects (97.3 %) over an average 29 ± 6 months (range, 18-39 months) follow-up period. A total of 3296 (82.4 %) of 4000 coronary artery segments examined exhibited diagnostic image quality on combined whole-heart and volume-targeted CMRA. Combined MRI detected significant CADs in 13 (3.8 %) of 341 subjects. Among these, 11 subjects (84.6 %) had both coronary artery stenosis (≥50 % by diameter) on CMRA and stress-perfusion defects in corresponding areas. Five of the 13 subjects showed evidence of old myocardial infarctions on delayed-enhancement MRI. Three subjects (0.9 %) underwent percutaneous coronary intervention after CAD was detected on cardiac MRI. There were no cardiac events during the follow-up period in subjects who complied with follow-up. Normal stress-perfusion and delayed-enhancement MRI lead to excellent outcomes when used to predict future cardiac events in asymptomatic subjects. Coronary MRA correlates well with stress-perfusion MRI for detecting significant CAD and helps exclude CAD in asymptomatic individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25916321     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-015-0665-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  41 in total

1.  Prognostic value of cardiac risk factors and coronary artery calcium screening for all-cause mortality.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Paolo Raggi; Enrique Schisterman; Daniel S Berman; Tracy Q Callister
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Diagnostic performance of multidetector CT angiography for assessment of coronary artery disease: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Piet K Vanhoenacker; Majanka H Heijenbrok-Kal; Ruben Van Heste; Isabel Decramer; Lieven R Van Hoe; William Wijns; M G Myriam Hunink
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  MR-IMPACT II: Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary artery disease Trial: perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparative multicentre, multivendor trial.

Authors:  Juerg Schwitter; Christian M Wacker; Norbert Wilke; Nidal Al-Saadi; Ekkehart Sauer; Kalman Huettle; Stefan O Schönberg; Andreas Luchner; Oliver Strohm; Hakan Ahlstrom; Thorsten Dill; Nadja Hoebel; Tamas Simor
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Prevalence of noncalcified coronary plaques by 64-slice computed tomography in patients with an intermediate risk for significant coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Jörg Hausleiter; Tanja Meyer; Martin Hadamitzky; Adnan Kastrati; Stefan Martinoff; Albert Schömig
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Diagnostic value of 64-slice CT angiography in coronary artery disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun; Chenghsun Lin; Robert Davidson; Chiauhuei Dong; Yunchan Liao
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Preventing myocardial infarction in the young adult in the first place: how do the National Cholesterol Education Panel III guidelines perform?

Authors:  Kwame O Akosah; Ana Schaper; Christopher Cogbill; Paul Schoenfeld
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Coronary heart disease and stroke deaths - United States, 2009.

Authors:  Cathleen D Gillespie; Charles Wigington; Yuling Hong
Journal:  MMWR Suppl       Date:  2013-11-22

8.  Prognostic significance of silent myocardial infarction in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus: United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) 79.

Authors:  Timothy M E Davis; Ruth L Coleman; Rury R Holman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Impact of an abdominal belt on breathing patterns and scan efficiency in whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography: comparison between the UK and Japan.

Authors:  Masaki Ishida; Andreas Schuster; Shinichi Takase; Geraint Morton; Amedeo Chiribiri; Boris Bigalke; Tobias Schaeffter; Hajime Sakuma; Eike Nagel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Non-invasive cardiac assessment in high risk patients (The GROUND study): rationale, objectives and design of a multi-center randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Alexander M de Vos; Annemarieke Rutten; Hester J van de Zaag-Loonen; Michiel L Bots; Riksta Dikkers; Robert A Buiskool; Willem P Mali; Daniel D Lubbers; Arend Mosterd; Mathias Prokop; Benno J Rensing; Maarten J Cramer; H Wouter van Es; Frans L Moll; Eric D van de Pavoordt; Pieter A Doevendans; Birgitta K Velthuis; Albert J Mackaay; Felix Zijlstra; Matthijs Oudkerk
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2015 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Hiram G Bezerra; Ricardo A Costa; Johan H C Reiber; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur A Stillman; Johan De Sutter; Nico R L Van de Veire
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Prediction of cardiovascular outcomes by imaging coronary atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Faraz Pathan; Kazuaki Negishi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-08

3.  Unrecognized myocardial infarction detected on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: Association with coronary artery calcium score and cardiovascular risk prediction scores in asymptomatic Asian cohort.

Authors:  Min Jae Cha; Sung Mok Kim; Yiseul Kim; Hyun Su Kim; Soo Jin Cho; Jidong Sung; Yeon Hyeon Choe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.