Literature DB >> 10736280

Noninvasive detection of myocardial ischemia from perfusion reserve based on cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

N Al-Saadi1, E Nagel, M Gross, A Bornstedt, B Schnackenburg, C Klein, W Klimek, H Oswald, E Fleck.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Myocardial perfusion reserve can be noninvasively assessed with cardiovascular MR. In this study, the diagnostic accuracy of this technique for the detection of significant coronary artery stenosis was evaluated. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In 15 patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease and 5 patients without significant coronary artery disease, the signal intensity-time curves of the first pass of a gadolinium-DTPA bolus injected through a central vein catheter were evaluated before and after dipyridamole infusion to validate the technique. A linear fit was used to determine the upslope, and a cutoff value for the differentiation between the myocardium supplied by stenotic and nonstenotic coronary arteries was defined. The diagnostic accuracy was then examined prospectively in 34 patients with coronary artery disease and was compared with coronary angiography. A significant difference in myocardial perfusion reserve between ischemic and normal myocardial segments (1.08+/-0.23 and 2.33+/-0.41; P<0.001) was found that resulted in a cutoff value of 1.5 (mean minus 2 SD of normal segments). In the prospective analysis, sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy for the detection of coronary artery stenosis (> or =75%) were 90%, 83%, and 87%, respectively. Interobserver and intraobserver variabilities for the linear fit were low (r=0.96 and 0.99).
CONCLUSIONS: MR first-pass perfusion measurements yielded a high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of coronary artery disease. Myocardial perfusion reserve can be easily and reproducibly determined by a linear fit of the upslope of the signal intensity-time curves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10736280     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.101.12.1379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  117 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging in detection and functional assessment of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Wojciech Mazur; Steffen Brucks; Stephen N Darty; Pairoj Rerkpattanapipat
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 2.  Contrast agents and cardiac MR imaging of myocardial ischemia: from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Pierre Croisille; Didier Revel; Maythem Saeed
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Magnetic resonance perfusion imaging in patients with coronary artery disease: a qualitative approach.

Authors:  Penelope R Sensky; Nilesh J Samani; Christine Reek; Graham R Cherryman
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Myocardial perfusion imaging by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Katherine C Wu
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Imaging sequences in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: current role, evolving applications, and technical challenges.

Authors:  El-Sayed H Ibrahim
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Peri-infarct ischaemia assessed by cardiovascular MRI: comparison with quantitative perfusion single photon emission CT imaging.

Authors:  E Gerbaud; H Cochet; E Bullier; C Ragot; S H Gilbert; H Douard; Y Pucheu; F Laurent; P Coste; L Bordenave; M Montaudon
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 9.  Role of cardiac MRI in diabetes.

Authors:  Ravi V Shah; Siddique A Abbasi; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Diagnostic accuracy of stress perfusion CMR in comparison with quantitative coronary angiography: fully quantitative, semiquantitative, and qualitative assessment.

Authors:  Federico E Mordini; Tariq Haddad; Li-Yueh Hsu; Peter Kellman; Tracy B Lowrey; Anthony H Aletras; W Patricia Bandettini; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.