Literature DB >> 12462538

Vision and mobility performance of subjects with age-related macular degeneration.

Shirin E Hassan1, Jan E Lovie-Kitchin, Russell L Woods.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) on mobility performance and to identify the vision determinants of mobility in subjects with ARMD.
METHODS: Walking speed and the number of obstacle contacts made on a 79-m indoor mobility course were measured in 21 subjects with ARMD and 11 age-matched subjects with normal vision. The mobility measures were transformed to percentage preferred walking speed and contacts score. The vision functions assessed included binocular visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and visual field.
RESULTS: In this study, subjects with ARMD did not walk significantly slower or make significantly more obstacle contacts on the mobility course than the normally sighted subjects of similar age. Between 29% and 35% of the variance in the ARMD mobility performance was accounted for by visual field and contrast sensitivity measures. The most significant predictor of mobility performance scored as percentage preferred walking speed was the size of a binocular central scotoma.
CONCLUSION: As the size of a binocular central scotoma increases, mobility performance decreases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12462538     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-200211000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  29 in total

1.  Image jitter enhances visual performance when spatial resolution is impaired.

Authors:  Lynne M Watson; Niall C Strang; Fraser Scobie; Gordon D Love; Dirk Seidel; Velitchko Manahilov
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Recognition of ramps and steps by people with low vision.

Authors:  Tiana M Bochsler; Gordon E Legge; Rachel Gage; Christopher S Kallie
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  A standardized obstacle course for assessment of visual function in ultra low vision and artificial vision.

Authors:  Amy Catherine Nau; Christine Pintar; Christopher Fisher; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; KwonHo Jeong
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Beneficial Effects of Spatial Remapping for Reading With Simulated Central Field Loss.

Authors:  Anshul Gupta; Juraj Mesik; Stephen A Engel; Rebecca Smith; Mark Schatza; Aurélie Calabrèse; Frederik J van Kuijk; Arthur G Erdman; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 5.  Functional and cortical adaptations to central vision loss.

Authors:  Sing-Hang Cheung; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.241

6.  Simulation of a central scotoma using contact lenses with an opaque centre.

Authors:  Essam S Almutleb; Arthur Bradley; Jason Jedlicka; Shirin E Hassan
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Visually guided navigation: head-mounted eye-tracking of natural locomotion in children and adults.

Authors:  John M Franchak; Karen E Adolph
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Fall risk in older adults: roles of self-rated vision, home modifications, and limb function.

Authors:  Bernard A Steinman; Jon Pynoos; Anna Q D Nguyen
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2009-06-03

9.  Toward a wide-field retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Hossein Ameri; Tanapat Ratanapakorn; Stefan Ufer; Helmut Eckhardt; Mark S Humayun; James D Weiland
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Characteristics of dynamic processing in the visual field of patients with age-related maculopathy.

Authors:  Werner Eisenbarth; Manfred Mackeben; Dorothe A Poggel; Hans Strasburger
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.