Literature DB >> 22879352

Intracranial electroencephalography reveals different temporal profiles for dorsal- and ventro-lateral prefrontal cortex in preparing to stop action.

Nicole C Swann1, Nitin Tandon, Thomas A Pieters, Adam R Aron.   

Abstract

Preparing to stop an inappropriate action requires keeping in mind the task goal and using this to influence the action control system. We tested the hypothesis that different subregions of prefrontal cortex show different temporal profiles consistent with dissociable contributions to preparing-to-stop, with dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) representing the task goal and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) implementing action control. Five human subjects were studied using electrocorticography recorded from subdural grids over right lateral frontal cortex. On each trial, a task cue instructed the subject whether stopping might be needed or not (Maybe Stop [MS] or No Stop [NS]), followed by a go cue, and on some MS trials, a subsequent stop signal. We focused on go trials, comparing MS with NS. In the DLPFC, most subjects had an increase in high gamma activity following the task cue and the go cue. In contrast, in the VLPFC, all subjects had activity after the go cue near the time of the motor response on MS trials, related to behavioral slowing, and significantly later than the DLPFC activity. These different temporal profiles suggest that DLPFC and VLPFC could have dissociable roles, with DLPFC representing task goals and VLPFC implementing action control.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cognitive control; electrocorticography; gamma frequency band; stop signal task

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22879352      PMCID: PMC3767964          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  56 in total

1.  Cortico-subthalamic white matter tract strength predicts interindividual efficacy in stopping a motor response.

Authors:  Birte U Forstmann; Max C Keuken; Sara Jahfari; Pierre-Louis Bazin; Jane Neumann; Andreas Schäfer; Alfred Anwander; Robert Turner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  Localizing performance of go/no-go tasks to prefrontal cortical subregions.

Authors:  Junichi Chikazoe
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychiatry       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.741

Review 3.  A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence.

Authors:  Pascal Fries
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 4.  Functional role of the supplementary and pre-supplementary motor areas.

Authors:  Parashkev Nachev; Christopher Kennard; Masud Husain
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Intracranial EEG reveals a time- and frequency-specific role for the right inferior frontal gyrus and primary motor cortex in stopping initiated responses.

Authors:  Nicole Swann; Nitin Tandon; Ryan Canolty; Timothy M Ellmore; Linda K McEvoy; Stephen Dreyer; Michael DiSano; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Executive "brake failure" following deactivation of human frontal lobe.

Authors:  Christopher D Chambers; Mark A Bellgrove; Mark G Stokes; Tracy R Henderson; Hugh Garavan; Ian H Robertson; Adam P Morris; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Dissociable mechanisms of cognitive control in prefrontal and premotor cortex.

Authors:  Christopher D Chambers; Mark A Bellgrove; Ian C Gould; Therese English; Hugh Garavan; Elizabeth McNaught; Marc Kamke; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  A network centered on ventral premotor cortex exerts both facilitatory and inhibitory control over primary motor cortex during action reprogramming.

Authors:  Ethan R Buch; Rogier B Mars; Erie D Boorman; Matthew F S Rushworth
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience.

Authors:  Christopher D Chambers; Hugh Garavan; Mark A Bellgrove
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  Gamma rhythms and beta rhythms have different synchronization properties.

Authors:  N Kopell; G B Ermentrout; M A Whittington; R D Traub
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  31 in total

1.  Chronometric electrical stimulation of right inferior frontal cortex increases motor braking.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; Christopher R Conner; Adam R Aron; Nitin Tandon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Unexpected events induce motor slowing via a brain mechanism for action-stopping with global suppressive effects.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates response inhibition through dynamic modulation of the fronto-basal ganglia network.

Authors:  Marco Sandrini; Benjamin Xu; Rita Volochayev; Oluwole Awosika; Wen-Tung Wang; John A Butman; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Guanfacine enhances inhibitory control and attentional shifting in early abstinent cocaine-dependent individuals.

Authors:  Helen Fox; Mehmet Sofuoglu; Rajita Sinha
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 4.153

5.  Frontal and motor cortex contributions to response inhibition: evidence from electrocorticography.

Authors:  Yvonne M Fonken; Jochem W Rieger; Elinor Tzvi; Nathan E Crone; Edward Chang; Josef Parvizi; Robert T Knight; Ulrike M Krämer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Sequential activation of premotor, primary somatosensory and primary motor areas in humans during cued finger movements.

Authors:  Hai Sun; Timothy M Blakely; Felix Darvas; Jeremiah D Wander; Lise A Johnson; David K Su; Kai J Miller; Eberhard E Fetz; Jeffery G Ojemann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Perceptual Surprise Improves Action Stopping by Nonselectively Suppressing Motor Activity via a Neural Mechanism for Motor Inhibition.

Authors:  Isabella C Dutra; Darcy A Waller; Jan R Wessel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Selective inhibition of a multicomponent response can be achieved without cost.

Authors:  Jing Xu; Zachary Westrick; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Inhibitory motor control based on complex stopping goals relies on the same brain network as simple stopping.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Frontal preparatory neural oscillations associated with cognitive control: A developmental study comparing young adults and adolescents.

Authors:  Kai Hwang; Avniel S Ghuman; Dara S Manoach; Stephanie R Jones; Beatriz Luna
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.