Literature DB >> 29305533

Perceptual Surprise Improves Action Stopping by Nonselectively Suppressing Motor Activity via a Neural Mechanism for Motor Inhibition.

Isabella C Dutra1, Darcy A Waller1, Jan R Wessel2,3.   

Abstract

Motor inhibition is a cognitive control ability that allows humans to stop actions rapidly even after initiation. Understanding and improving motor inhibition could benefit adaptive behavior in both health and disease. We recently found that presenting surprising, task-unrelated sounds when stopping is necessary improves the likelihood of successful stopping. In the current study, we investigated the neural underpinnings of this effect. Specifically, we tested whether surprise-related stopping improvements are due to a genuine increase in motor inhibition. In Experiment 1, we measured motor inhibition in primary motor cortex of male and female humans by quantifying corticospinal excitability (CSE) via transcranial magnetic stimulation and electromyography during a hybrid surprise-Go/NoGo task. Consistent with prior studies of motor inhibition, successful stopping was accompanied by nonselective suppression of CSE; that is, CSE was suppressed even in task-unrelated motor effectors. Importantly, unexpected sounds significantly increased this motor-system inhibition to a degree that was directly related to behavioral improvements in stopping. In Experiment 2, we then used scalp encephalography to investigate whether unexpected sounds increase motor-inhibition-related activity in the CNS. We used an independent stop-signal localizer task to identify a well characterized frontocentral low-frequency EEG component that indexes motor inhibition. We then investigated the activity of this component in the surprise-Go/NoGo task. Consistent with Experiment 1, this signature of motor inhibition was indeed increased when NoGo signals were followed by unexpected sounds. Together, these experiments provide converging evidence suggesting that unexpected events improve motor inhibition by automatically triggering inhibitory control.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The ability to stop ongoing actions rapidly allows humans to adapt their behavior flexibly and rapidly. Action stopping is important in daily life (e.g., stopping to cross the street when a car approaches) and is severely impaired in many neuropsychiatric disorders. Therefore, finding ways to improve action stopping could aid adaptive behaviors in health and disease. Our current study shows that presenting unexpected sounds in stopping situations facilitates successful stopping. This improvement is specifically due to a surprise-related increase in a neural mechanism for motor inhibition, which rapidly suppresses the excitability of the motor system after unexpected events. These findings suggest a tight interaction between the neural systems for surprise processing and motor inhibition and yield a promising avenue for future research.
Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/381482-11$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Go/NoGo task; corticospinal excitability; motor evoked potentials; motor inhibition; stop-signal P3; surprise

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29305533      PMCID: PMC5815349          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3091-17.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  67 in total

1.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

2.  Electrophysiological evidence for the involvement of proactive and reactive control in a rewarded stop-signal task.

Authors:  Hanne Schevernels; Klaas Bombeke; Liesbet Van der Borght; Jens-Max Hopf; Ruth M Krebs; C Nicolas Boehler
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Prepotent motor activity and inhibitory control demands in different variants of the go/no-go paradigm.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution.

Authors:  A J Bell; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.026

5.  Frontal midline theta reflects anxiety and cognitive control: meta-analytic evidence.

Authors:  James F Cavanagh; Alexander J Shackman
Journal:  J Physiol Paris       Date:  2014-04-29

6.  A role for the subthalamic nucleus in response inhibition during conflict.

Authors:  John-Stuart Brittain; Kate E Watkins; Raed A Joundi; Nicola J Ray; Peter Holland; Alexander L Green; Tipu Z Aziz; Ned Jenkinson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Proactive adjustments of response strategies in the stop-signal paradigm.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  EEG signatures associated with stopping are sensitive to preparation.

Authors:  Ian Greenhouse; Jan R Wessel
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Pupil Dilation Signals Surprise: Evidence for Noradrenaline's Role in Decision Making.

Authors:  Kerstin Preuschoff; Bernard Marius 't Hart; Wolfgang Einhäuser
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on.

Authors:  Adam R Aron; Trevor W Robbins; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  20 in total

1.  Surprise: Unexpected Action Execution and Unexpected Inhibition Recruit the Same Fronto-Basal-Ganglia Network.

Authors:  Alexandra Sebastian; Anne Maria Konken; Michael Schaum; Klaus Lieb; Oliver Tüscher; Patrick Jung
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  β-Bursts Reveal the Trial-to-Trial Dynamics of Movement Initiation and Cancellation.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Non-selective inhibition of the motor system following unexpected and expected infrequent events.

Authors:  Carly Iacullo; Darcy A Diesburg; Jan R Wessel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Cognitive Control Promotes Either Honesty or Dishonesty, Depending on One's Moral Default.

Authors:  Sebastian P Speer; Ale Smidts; Maarten A S Boksem
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Common and Unique Inhibitory Control Signatures of Action-Stopping and Attentional Capture Suggest That Actions Are Stopped in Two Stages.

Authors:  Joshua R Tatz; Cheol Soh; Jan R Wessel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Towards real-world generalizability of a circuit for action-stopping.

Authors:  Ricci Hannah; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Unexpected Events Activate a Frontal-Basal-Ganglia Inhibitory Network: What Is the Role of the Pre-Supplementary Motor Area?

Authors:  Darcy A Diesburg; Joshua R Tatz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Distinct roles of dorsal and ventral subthalamic neurons in action selection and cancellation.

Authors:  Clayton P Mosher; Adam N Mamelak; Mahsa Malekmohammadi; Nader Pouratian; Ueli Rutishauser
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Paired-pulse TMS and scalp EEG reveal systematic relationship between inhibitory GABAa signaling in M1 and fronto-central cortical activity during action stopping.

Authors:  Megan Hynd; Cheol Soh; Benjamin O Rangel; Jan R Wessel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Unexpected Sounds Nonselectively Inhibit Active Visual Stimulus Representations.

Authors:  Cheol Soh; Jan R Wessel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.