Literature DB >> 25270603

Inhibitory motor control based on complex stopping goals relies on the same brain network as simple stopping.

Jan R Wessel1, Adam R Aron2.   

Abstract

Much research has modeled action-stopping using the stop-signal task (SST), in which an impending response has to be stopped when an explicit stop-signal occurs. A limitation of the SST is that real-world action-stopping rarely involves explicit stop-signals. Instead, the stopping-system engages when environmental features match more complex stopping goals. For example, when stepping into the street, one monitors path, velocity, size, and types of objects and only stops if there is a vehicle approaching. Here, we developed a task in which participants compared the visual features of a multidimensional go-stimulus to a complex stopping-template, and stopped their go-response if all features matched the template. We used independent component analysis of EEG data to show that the same motor inhibition brain network that explains action-stopping in the SST also implements motor inhibition in the complex-stopping task. Furthermore, we found that partial feature overlap between go-stimulus and stopping-template led to motor slowing, which also corresponded with greater stopping-network activity. This shows that the same brain system for action-stopping to explicit stop-signals is recruited to slow or stop behavior when stimuli match a complex stopping goal. The results imply a generalizability of the brain's network for simple action-stopping to more ecologically valid scenarios.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Braking; Electroencephalography; Independent component analysis; Inhibitory control; Stop-signal task

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25270603      PMCID: PMC4396635          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  66 in total

1.  Subthalamic nucleus stimulation reverses mediofrontal influence over decision threshold.

Authors:  James F Cavanagh; Thomas V Wiecki; Michael X Cohen; Christina M Figueroa; Johan Samanta; Scott J Sherman; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  Inhibitory control in mind and brain: an interactive race model of countermanding saccades.

Authors:  Leanne Boucher; Thomas J Palmeri; Gordon D Logan; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Conflict and inhibition differentially affect the N200/P300 complex in a combined go/nogo and stop-signal task.

Authors:  Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert; Carsten Konrad; Christo Pantev; René J Huster
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Electrophysiological activity underlying inhibitory control processes in normal adults.

Authors:  Mariana Schmajuk; Mario Liotti; Laura Busse; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution.

Authors:  A J Bell; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.026

6.  A role for the subthalamic nucleus in response inhibition during conflict.

Authors:  John-Stuart Brittain; Kate E Watkins; Raed A Joundi; Nicola J Ray; Peter Holland; Alexander L Green; Tipu Z Aziz; Ned Jenkinson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Inhibitory control in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: event-related potentials identify the processing component and timing of an impaired right-frontal response-inhibition mechanism.

Authors:  S R Pliszka; M Liotti; M G Woldorff
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 13.382

8.  Intracranial EEG reveals a time- and frequency-specific role for the right inferior frontal gyrus and primary motor cortex in stopping initiated responses.

Authors:  Nicole Swann; Nitin Tandon; Ryan Canolty; Timothy M Ellmore; Linda K McEvoy; Stephen Dreyer; Michael DiSano; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience.

Authors:  Christopher D Chambers; Hugh Garavan; Mark A Bellgrove
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on.

Authors:  Adam R Aron; Trevor W Robbins; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  18 in total

1.  Dimensional bias and adaptive adjustments in inhibitory control of monkeys.

Authors:  Sadegh Ghasemian; Marzieh M Vardanjani; Vahid Sheibani; Farshad A Mansouri
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 2.  On the Globality of Motor Suppression: Unexpected Events and Their Influence on Behavior and Cognition.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Motor Interference, But Not Sensory Interference, Increases Midfrontal Theta Activity and Brain Synchronization during Reactive Control.

Authors:  Jakob Kaiser; Simone Schütz-Bosbach
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Neural Architecture of Selective Stopping Strategies: Distinct Brain Activity Patterns Are Associated with Attentional Capture But Not with Outright Stopping.

Authors:  Alexandra Sebastian; Kora Rössler; Michael Wibral; Arian Mobascher; Klaus Lieb; Patrick Jung; Oliver Tüscher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Establishing a Right Frontal Beta Signature for Stopping Action in Scalp EEG: Implications for Testing Inhibitory Control in Other Task Contexts.

Authors:  Johanna Wagner; Jan R Wessel; Ayda Ghahremani; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Right inferior frontal cortex: addressing the rebuttals.

Authors:  Adam R Aron; Trevor W Robbins; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Surprise disrupts cognition via a fronto-basal ganglia suppressive mechanism.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; Ned Jenkinson; John-Stuart Brittain; Sarah H E M Voets; Tipu Z Aziz; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 8.  Neural and behavioral mechanisms of proactive and reactive inhibition.

Authors:  Heidi C Meyer; David J Bucci
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.460

9.  Evidence for capacity sharing when stopping.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-05-28

10.  Brain activation underlying turning in Parkinson's disease patients with and without freezing of gait: a virtual reality fMRI study.

Authors:  Moran Gilat; James M Shine; Courtney C Walton; Claire O'Callaghan; Julie M Hall; Simon J G Lewis
Journal:  NPJ Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2015-10-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.