CONTEXT: Lower bone density in young amenorrheic athletes (AA) compared to eumenorrheic athletes (EA) and non-athletes may increase fracture risk during a critical time of bone accrual. Finite element analysis (FEA) is a unique tool to estimate bone strength in vivo, and the contribution of cortical microstructure to bone strength in young athletes is not well understood. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that FEA-estimated stiffness and failure load are impaired in AA at the distal radius and tibia compared to EA and non-athletes despite weight-bearing exercise. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study; Clinical Research Center SUBJECTS: 34 female endurance athletes involved in weight-bearing sports (17 AA, 17 EA) and 16 non-athletes (14-21 years) of comparable age, maturity and BMI OUTCOME MEASURES: We used HR-pQCT images to assess cortical microarchitecture and FEA to estimate bone stiffness and failure load. RESULTS: Cortical perimeter, porosity and trabecular area at the weight-bearing tibia were greater in both groups of athletes than non-athletes, whereas the ratio (%) of cortical to total area was lowest in AA. Despite greater cortical porosity in EA, estimated tibial stiffness and failure load was higher than in non-athletes. However, this advantage was lost in AA. At the non-weight-bearing radius, failure load and stiffness were lower in AA than non-athletes. After controlling for lean mass and menarchal age, athletic status accounted for 5-9% of the variability in stiffness and failure load, menarchal age for 8-23%, and lean mass for 12-37%. CONCLUSION: AA have lower FEA-estimated bone strength at the distal radius than non-athletes, and lose the advantage of weight-bearing exercise seen in EA at the distal tibia.
CONTEXT: Lower bone density in young amenorrheic athletes (AA) compared to eumenorrheic athletes (EA) and non-athletes may increase fracture risk during a critical time of bone accrual. Finite element analysis (FEA) is a unique tool to estimate bone strength in vivo, and the contribution of cortical microstructure to bone strength in young athletes is not well understood. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that FEA-estimated stiffness and failure load are impaired in AA at the distal radius and tibia compared to EA and non-athletes despite weight-bearing exercise. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study; Clinical Research Center SUBJECTS: 34 female endurance athletes involved in weight-bearing sports (17 AA, 17 EA) and 16 non-athletes (14-21 years) of comparable age, maturity and BMI OUTCOME MEASURES: We used HR-pQCT images to assess cortical microarchitecture and FEA to estimate bone stiffness and failure load. RESULTS: Cortical perimeter, porosity and trabecular area at the weight-bearing tibia were greater in both groups of athletes than non-athletes, whereas the ratio (%) of cortical to total area was lowest in AA. Despite greater cortical porosity in EA, estimated tibial stiffness and failure load was higher than in non-athletes. However, this advantage was lost in AA. At the non-weight-bearing radius, failure load and stiffness were lower in AA than non-athletes. After controlling for lean mass and menarchal age, athletic status accounted for 5-9% of the variability in stiffness and failure load, menarchal age for 8-23%, and lean mass for 12-37%. CONCLUSION: AA have lower FEA-estimated bone strength at the distal radius than non-athletes, and lose the advantage of weight-bearing exercise seen in EA at the distal tibia.
Authors: Katharina E Schnackenburg; Heather M Macdonald; Reed Ferber; J Preston Wiley; Steven K Boyd Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Emily M Stein; X Sherry Liu; Thomas L Nickolas; Adi Cohen; Valerie Thomas; Donald J McMahon; Chiyuan Zhang; Felicia Cosman; Jeri Nieves; Justin Greisberg; X Edward Guo; Elizabeth Shane Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2011-04-20 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Nicolas Vilayphiou; Stephanie Boutroy; Pawel Szulc; Bert van Rietbergen; Francoise Munoz; Pierre D Delmas; Roland Chapurlat Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: L J Melton; B L Riggs; R Müller; S J Achenbach; D Christen; E J Atkinson; S Amin; S Khosla Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2011-02-10 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Kristy M Nicks; Shreyasee Amin; Elizabeth J Atkinson; B Lawrence Riggs; L Joseph Melton; Sundeep Khosla Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Salman Kirmani; David Christen; G Harry van Lenthe; Philip R Fischer; Mary L Bouxsein; Louise K McCready; L Joseph Melton; B Lawrence Riggs; Shreyasee Amin; Ralph Müller; Sundeep Khosla Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Kathryn E Ackerman; Vibha Singhal; Meghan Slattery; Kamryn T Eddy; Mary L Bouxsein; Hang Lee; Anne Klibanski; Madhusmita Misra Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2019-11-07 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: T F Cheung; K Y Cheuk; F W P Yu; V W Y Hung; C S Ho; T Y Zhu; B K W Ng; K M Lee; L Qin; S S Y Ho; G W K Wong; J C Y Cheng; T P Lam Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2016-03-24 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Elizabeth A Lawson; Kathryn E Ackerman; Nara Mendes Estella; Gabriela Guereca; Lisa Pierce; Patrick M Sluss; Mary L Bouxsein; Anne Klibanski; Madhusmita Misra Journal: Eur J Endocrinol Date: 2013-02-20 Impact factor: 6.664
Authors: Trent Stellingwerff; Ida A Heikura; Romain Meeusen; Stéphane Bermon; Stephen Seiler; Margo L Mountjoy; Louise M Burke Journal: Sports Med Date: 2021-06-28 Impact factor: 11.136