Literature DB >> 22095490

Relationship of age to bone microstructure independent of areal bone mineral density.

Kristy M Nicks1, Shreyasee Amin, Elizabeth J Atkinson, B Lawrence Riggs, L Joseph Melton, Sundeep Khosla.   

Abstract

Previous studies using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) have demonstrated that age is a major predictor of bone fragility and fracture risk independent of areal bone mineral density (aBMD). Although this aBMD-independent effect of age has been attributed to poor bone "quality," the structural basis for this remains unclear. Because high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) can assess bone microarchitecture, we matched younger and older subjects for aBMD at the ultradistal radius and assessed for possible differences in trabecular or cortical microstructure by HRpQCT. From an age-stratified, random sample of community adults, 44 women aged <50 years (mean age 41.0 years) were matched to 44 women aged ≥50 years (mean age 62.7 years) by ultradistal radius aBMD (mean ± SEM, younger and older aBMD 0.475 ± 0.011 and 0.472 ± 0.011 g/cm², respectively), and 57 men aged <50 years (mean age 41.3 years) were matched to 57 men aged ≥50 years (mean age 68.1 years; younger and older aBMD both 0.571 ± 0.008 g/cm²). In these matched subjects, there were no sex-specific differences in trabecular microstructural parameters. However, significant differences were noted in cortical microstructure (all p < 0.05): Older women and men had increased cortical porosity (by 91% and 56%, respectively), total cortical pore volume (by 77% and 61%, respectively), and mean cortical pore diameter (by 9% and 8%, respectively) compared with younger subjects. These findings indicate that younger and older women and men matched for DXA aBMD have similar trabecular microarchitecture but clearly different cortical microstructure, at least at an appendicular site represented by the radius. Further studies are needed to define the extent to which this deterioration in cortical microstructure contributes to the aBMD-independent effect of age on bone fragility and fracture risk at the distal radius and other sites of osteoporotic fractures.
© 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22095490      PMCID: PMC3636571          DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.1468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  26 in total

Review 1.  The epidemiology of falls and syncope.

Authors:  Laurence Z Rubenstein; Karen R Josephson
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.076

2.  Variations in morphological and biomechanical indices at the distal radius in subjects with identical BMD.

Authors:  Galateia J Kazakia; Andrew J Burghardt; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Structure of the femoral neck in hip fracture: cortical bone loss in the inferoanterior to superoposterior axis.

Authors:  K L Bell; N Loveridge; J Power; N Garrahan; M Stanton; M Lunt; B F Meggitt; J Reeve
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Software for optimal matching in observational studies.

Authors:  E J Bergstralh; J L Kosanke; S J Jacobsen
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Age-related patterns of trabecular and cortical bone loss differ between sexes and skeletal sites: a population-based HR-pQCT study.

Authors:  Heather M Macdonald; Kyle K Nishiyama; Jian Kang; David A Hanley; Steven K Boyd
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project.

Authors:  L J Melton
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  In vivo high resolution 3D-QCT of the human forearm.

Authors:  A Laib; H J Häuselmann; P Rüegsegger
Journal:  Technol Health Care       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.285

8.  Ridge number density: a new parameter for in vivo bone structure analysis.

Authors:  A Laib; T Hildebrand; H J Häuselmann; P Rüegsegger
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Calibration of trabecular bone structure measurements of in vivo three-dimensional peripheral quantitative computed tomography with 28-microm-resolution microcomputed tomography.

Authors:  A Laib; P Rüegsegger
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Age and bone mass as predictors of fracture in a prospective study.

Authors:  S L Hui; C W Slemenda; C C Johnston
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 14.808

View more
  59 in total

1.  Structural analysis of cortical porosity applied to HR-pQCT data.

Authors:  Willy Tjong; Jasmine Nirody; Andrew J Burghardt; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Galateia J Kazakia
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Advanced CT based in vivo methods for the assessment of bone density, structure, and strength.

Authors:  K Engelke; C Libanati; T Fuerst; P Zysset; H K Genant
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  In vivo assessment of bone quality in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Joshua N Farr; Matthew T Drake; Shreyasee Amin; L Joseph Melton; Louise K McCready; Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Cortical microstructure and estimated bone strength in young amenorrheic athletes, eumenorrheic athletes and non-athletes.

Authors:  Kathryn E Ackerman; Melissa Putman; Gabriela Guereca; Alexander P Taylor; Lisa Pierce; David B Herzog; Anne Klibanski; Mary Bouxsein; Madhusmita Misra
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Age-related reference curves of volumetric bone density, structure, and biomechanical parameters adjusted for weight and height in a population of healthy women: an HR-pQCT study.

Authors:  J C Alvarenga; H Fuller; S G Pasoto; R M R Pereira
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Skeletal changes through the lifespan--from growth to senescence.

Authors:  Joshua N Farr; Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 7.  Sex-Differences in Skeletal Growth and Aging.

Authors:  Jeri W Nieves
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 8.  The role of estrogen and androgen receptors in bone health and disease.

Authors:  Stavros C Manolagas; Charles A O'Brien; Maria Almeida
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 9.  Bone quality: the determinants of bone strength and fragility.

Authors:  Hélder Fonseca; Daniel Moreira-Gonçalves; Hans-Joachim Appell Coriolano; José Alberto Duarte
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Multicenter precision of cortical and trabecular bone quality measures assessed by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Andrew J Burghardt; Jean-Baptiste Pialat; Galateia J Kazakia; Stephanie Boutroy; Klaus Engelke; Janina M Patsch; Alexander Valentinitsch; Danmei Liu; Eva Szabo; Cesar E Bogado; Maria Belen Zanchetta; Heather A McKay; Elizabeth Shane; Steven K Boyd; Mary L Bouxsein; Roland Chapurlat; Sundeep Khosla; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.