Literature DB >> 22868361

Laparoscopic colon resection trends in utilization and rate of conversion to open procedure: a national database review of academic medical centers.

Anton Simorov1, Abhijit Shaligram, Valerie Shostrom, Eugene Boilesen, Jon Thompson, Dmitry Oleynikov.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine trends of utilization and rates of conversion to open procedure for patients undergoing laparoscopic colon resections (LCR).
METHODS: This study is a national database review of academic medical centers and a retrospective analysis utilizing the University HealthSystem Consortium administrative database-an alliance of more than 300 academic and affiliate hospitals.
RESULTS: A total of 85,712 patients underwent colon resections between October 2008 and December 2011. LCR was attempted in 36,228 patients (42.2%), with 5751 patients (15.8%) requiring conversion to an open procedure. There was a trend toward increasing utilization of LCR from 37.5% in 2008 to 44.1% in 2011. Attempted laparoscopic transverse colectomy had the highest rate of conversion (20.8%), followed by left (20.7%), right (15.6%), and sigmoid (14.3%) colon resections. The rate of utilization was highest in the Mid-Atlantic region (50.5%) and in medium- to large-sized hospitals (47.0%-49.0%).Multivariate logistic regression has shown that increasing age [odds ratio (OR) = 4.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.6-6.4], male sex (OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.1-1.3), open as compared with laparoscopic approach (OR = 2.6, 95%, CI = 2.3-3.1), and greater severity of illness category (OR = 27.1, 95% CI = 23.0-31.9) were all associated with increased mortality and morbidity and prolonged length of hospital stay.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a trend of increasing utilization of LCR, with acceptable conversion rates, across hospitals in the United States over the recent years. When feasible, attempted LCR had better outcomes than open colectomy in the immediate perioperative period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22868361     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182657ec5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  42 in total

1.  [Risk awareness and training for prevention of complications in minimally invasive surgery].

Authors:  F Nickel; K-F Kowalewski; B P Müller-Stich
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Laparoscopic vs open partial colectomy in elderly patients: Insights from the American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

Authors:  Umashankkar Kannan; Vemuru Sunil K Reddy; Amar N Mukerji; Vellore S Parithivel; Ajay K Shah; Brian F Gilchrist; Daniel T Farkas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Significant reduction in the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after laparoscopic compared to open segmental colorectal resection.

Authors:  Daniel D Klaristenfeld; Elisabeth C McLemore; Bonnie H Li; Mohammad A Abbass; Maher A Abbas
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  [Evidence in minimally invasive oncological surgery of the colon and rectum].

Authors:  Carolin Kastner; Joachim Reibetanz; Christoph-Thomas Germer; Armin Wiegering
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Can laparoscopy for colon resection reduce the need for discharge to skilled care facility?

Authors:  Abhijit Shaligram; Lynette Smith; Pradeep Pallati; Anton Simorov; Jane Meza; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis. Results from a multicentre comparative study on 512 right-sided colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Marco Milone; Ugo Elmore; Enrico Di Salvo; Paolo Delrio; Luigi Bucci; Giuseppe Paolo Ferulano; Carmine Napolitano; Maria Rachele Angiolini; Umberto Bracale; Marco Clemente; Michele D'ambra; Gaetano Luglio; Mario Musella; Ugo Pace; Riccardo Rosati; Francesco Milone
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Robotic approaches may offer benefit in colorectal procedures, more controversial in other areas: a review of 168,248 cases.

Authors:  Maria S Altieri; Jie Yang; Dana A Telem; Jiawen Zhu; Caitlin Halbert; Mark Talamini; Aurora D Pryor
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic colorectal surgery to open surgery: does conversion worsen outcome?

Authors:  Hossein Masoomi; Zhobin Moghadamyeghaneh; Steven Mills; Joseph C Carmichael; Alessio Pigazzi; Michael J Stamos
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Single-Site Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Provides Similar Clinical Outcomes Compared With Standard Laparoscopic Surgery: An Analysis of 626 Patients.

Authors:  William Sangster; Evangelos Messaris; Arthur S Berg; David B Stewart
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive versus open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Christina M Papageorge; Qianqian Zhao; Eugene F Foley; Bruce A Harms; Charles P Heise; Evie H Carchman; Gregory D Kennedy
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.192

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.