Literature DB >> 23793808

Can laparoscopy for colon resection reduce the need for discharge to skilled care facility?

Abhijit Shaligram1, Lynette Smith, Pradeep Pallati, Anton Simorov, Jane Meza, Dmitry Oleynikov.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of patients, especially the elderly undergoing colon resections, are likely to be discharged to a skilled care facility. This study aims to examine whether the technique of colectomy, open versus laparoscopic, contributed to their discharge to a skilled care facility.
METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis using discharge data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Adult patients who underwent colectomy in 2009 were evaluated. SAS and SUDAAN software were used to provide weighted estimates and to account for the complex sampling design of the NIS. We compared routine discharge to nonroutine discharge, defined as transfer to short-term hospital, skilled nursing facility, intermediate care, home health, or another type of facility.
RESULTS: A weighted total of 221,294 adult patients underwent colectomy in 2009 and had the primary outcome of discharge available. Of these colon resections, 70,361 (32 %) were performed laparoscopically and 150,933 (68 %) by open technique. A total of 139,047 (62.8 %) patients had routine discharge and 73,572 (33.3 %) nonroutine. A total of 8,445 (3.8 %) patients died while in the hospital, and 229 (0.1 %) left against medical advice and were excluded from further analysis. On univariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, female gender, Black/Hispanic race, open technique (compared to laparoscopic), Medicare/Medicaid insurance status, comorbidity index of ≥ 1, and malignant primary diagnosis predicted nonroutine discharge. A multivariate logistic model was then used to predict nonroutine discharge in these patients using variables significant in the univariate analysis at the α = 0.05 significance level. In the multivariate analysis, open compared to laparoscopic technique was independently associated with increased likelihood of discharge to skilled care facilities (odds ratio 2.85, 95 % confidence interval 2.59-3.14).
CONCLUSIONS: In addition to the expected factors like advancing age, female gender, and increasing comorbidity index, open compared to laparoscopic technique for colectomy is associated with an increased likelihood of discharge to skilled care facilities. When feasible, the laparoscopic technique should be considered as an option, especially in the elderly patients who require colon resection, because it may reduce their likelihood of discharge to a skilled care facility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23793808     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3052-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  16 in total

1.  Predictors of postdischarge complications: role of in-hospital length of stay.

Authors:  Tolulope A Oyetunji; Patricia L Turner; Sharon K Onguti; Imudia D Ehanire; Forrestall O Dorsett; Terrence M Fullum; Edward E Cornwell; Adil H Haider
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Relative importance of preoperative health status versus intraoperative factors in predicting postoperative adverse outcomes in geriatric surgical patients.

Authors:  J M Leung; S Dzankic
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

5.  Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.

Authors:  Hude Quan; Vijaya Sundararajan; Patricia Halfon; Andrew Fong; Bernard Burnand; Jean-Christophe Luthi; L Duncan Saunders; Cynthia A Beck; Thomas E Feasby; William A Ghali
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  The significance of discharge to skilled care after abdominopelvic surgery in older adults.

Authors:  Victor J Legner; Nader N Massarweh; Rebecca G Symons; Wayne C McCormick; David R Flum
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Antonio M Lacy; Juan C García-Valdecasas; Salvadora Delgado; Antoni Castells; Pilar Taurá; Josep M Piqué; Josep Visa
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-29       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database.

Authors:  Conor P Delaney; Eunice Chang; Anthony J Senagore; Michael Broder
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Outcomes of laparoscopic and open colectomy: a national population-based comparison.

Authors:  Jason A Kemp; Samuel R G Finlayson
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.058

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic surgery in the elderly: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Andrew T Bates; Celia Divino
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 6.745

Review 2.  What have we learned in minimally invasive colorectal surgery from NSQIP and NIS large databases? A systematic review.

Authors:  Gabriela Batista Rodríguez; Andrea Balla; Santiago Corradetti; Carmen Martinez; Pilar Hernández; Jesús Bollo; Eduard M Targarona
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 2.571

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.