Literature DB >> 25631940

Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic colorectal surgery to open surgery: does conversion worsen outcome?

Hossein Masoomi1, Zhobin Moghadamyeghaneh, Steven Mills, Joseph C Carmichael, Alessio Pigazzi, Michael J Stamos.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The utilization of laparoscopy in colorectal surgery is increasing. However, conversion to open surgery remains relatively high.
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated (1) conversion rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery; (2) the outcomes of converted cases compared with successful laparoscopic and open colorectal operations; (3) predictive risk factors of conversion of laparoscopic colorectal surgery to open surgery.
METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample database, we examined the clinical data of patients who underwent colon and rectal resection from 2009 to 2010. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify factors predictive for conversion of laparoscopic to open operation.
RESULTS: A total of 207,311 patients underwent intended laparoscopic colorectal resection during this period. The conversion rate was 16.6 %. Considering resection type and pathology, the highest conversion rates were observed in proctectomy (31.4 %) and Crohn's disease (20.2 %). Using multivariate regression analysis, Crohn's disease (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.80), prior abdominal surgery (AOR, 2.45), proctectomy (AOR, 2.42), malignant pathology (AOR, 1.90), emergent surgery (AOR, 1.82), obesity (AOR, 1.63), and ulcerative colitis (AOR, 1.60) significantly impacted the risk of conversion. Compared with patients who were successfully completed laparoscopically, converted patients had a significantly higher complication rate (laparoscopic: 23 %; vs. converted: 35.2 % vs. open: 35.3 %), a higher in-hospital mortality rate (laparoscopic: 0.5 %; vs. converted: 0.6 %; vs. open: 1.7 %) and a longer mean hospital stay (laparoscopic: 5.4 days; vs. converted: 8.1 days; vs. open: 8.4 days); however, converted patients had better outcomes compared with the open group.
CONCLUSIONS: The conversion rate in colorectal surgery was 16.6 %. Converted patients had significantly higher rates of morbidity and mortality compared to successfully completed laparoscopic cases, although lower than open cases. Crohn's disease, prior abdominal surgery, and proctectomy are the strongest predictors for conversion of laparoscopic to open in colorectal operations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25631940     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-015-2958-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  27 in total

1.  Converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  P Gervaz; A Pikarsky; M Utech; M Secic; J Efron; B Belin; A Jain; S Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Age and type of procedure influence the choice of patients for laparoscopic colectomy.

Authors:  B Sklow; T Read; E Birnbaum; R Fry; J Fleshman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: long-term oncologic results.

Authors:  Christophe Laurent; Fabien Leblanc; Philippe Wütrich; Mathieu Scheffler; Eric Rullier
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Is laparoscopic colon surgery appropriate in patients who have had previous abdominal surgery?

Authors:  Andrew Barleben; Dhruvil Gandhi; Xuan-Mai Nguyen; Fred Che; Ninh T Nguyen; Steven Mills; Michael J Stamos
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 0.688

5.  Impact of hospital case volume on short-term outcome after laparoscopic operation for colonic cancer.

Authors:  E Kuhry; H J Bonjer; E Haglind; W C J Hop; R Veldkamp; M A Cuesta; J Jeekel; L Påhlman; M Morino; A Lacy; S Delgado
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-30       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Is obesity a high-risk factor for laparoscopic colorectal surgery?

Authors:  A J Pikarsky; Y Saida; T Yamaguchi; S Martinez; W Chen; E G Weiss; J J Nogueras; S D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-02-06       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Conversion of laparoscopic colon resection does not affect survival in colon cancer.

Authors:  Jan Franko; Steven A Fassler; Masoud Rezvani; Brendan G O'Connell; Steven G Harper; Joseph H Nejman; D Mark Zebley
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2009.

Authors:  Celeste Y Kang; Obaid O Chaudhry; Wissam J Halabi; Vinh Nguyen; Joseph C Carmichael; Michael J Stamos; Steven Mills
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  35 in total

1.  Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Approach in Colon Surgery.

Authors:  Zhobin Moghadamyeghaneh; Joseph C Carmichael; Steven Mills; Alessio Pigazzi; Ninh T Nguyen; Michael J Stamos
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Colectomy Improves Perioperative Outcomes Without Increasing Operative Time Compared to the Open Approach: a National Analysis of 8791 Patients.

Authors:  Harold J Leraas; Cecilia T Ong; Zhifei Sun; Mohamed A Adam; Jina Kim; Brian F Gilmore; Brian Ezekian; Uttara S Nag; Christopher R Mantyh; John Migaly
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Conversion during laparoscopic colorectal resections: a complication or a drawback? A systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Mariano Cesare Giglio; Valerio Celentano; Rachele Tarquini; Gaetano Luglio; Giovanni Domenico De Palma; Luigi Bucci
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Tips, Tricks, and Technique for Laparoscopic Colectomy.

Authors:  Alexandra Briggs; Joel Goldberg
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-04

5.  Post-Hospital Discharge Venous Thromboembolism in Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Zhobin Moghadamyeghaneh; Reza Fazl Alizadeh; Mark H Hanna; Grace Hwang; Joseph C Carmichael; Steven Mills; Alessio Pigazzi; Michael J Stamos
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Are short-term outcomes worse than with open surgery?

Authors:  E Gorgun; C Benlice; M A Abbas; L Stocchi; F H Remzi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy.

Authors:  Zhobin Moghadamyeghaneh; Mark H Hanna; Joseph C Carmichael; Alessio Pigazzi; Michael J Stamos; Steven Mills
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Comparison of Functional Recovery is Crucial for Implementing ERAS: Reply.

Authors:  A Kummer; D Hahnloser; N Demartines; M Hübner
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Adoption of Robotic Technology for Treating Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Mario Schootman; Samantha Hendren; Kendra Ratnapradipa; Lisa Stringer; Nick O Davidson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Influence of previous abdominal surgery on surgical outcomes between laparoscopic and open surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer: subanalysis of a large multicenter study in Japan.

Authors:  Seiichiro Yamamoto; Takao Hinoi; Hiroaki Niitsu; Masazumi Okajima; Yoshihito Ide; Kohei Murata; Shintaro Akamoto; Akiyoshi Kanazawa; Masayoshi Nakanishi; Takeshi Naitoh; Eiji Kanehira; Tsukasa Shimamura; Ichio Suzuka; Yosuke Fukunaga; Takashi Yamaguchi; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 7.527

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.