| Literature DB >> 33263772 |
Carolin Kastner1,2, Joachim Reibetanz1, Christoph-Thomas Germer1,3, Armin Wiegering4,5,6.
Abstract
An essential component of the treatment of colorectal cancer is a resection of the tumor-bearing segment of the bowels. After the development of minimally invasive procedures the feasibility and safety in oncological, colorectal surgery was questioned. The broad study situation for colon cancer over the last years showed predominantly consistent benefits during the perioperative phase and non-inferiority concerning long-term oncological outcomes. The implementation of laparoscopic rectal resection was more hesitant due to the complexity of the procedure and insufficient study data; however, overall the short-term benefits seem to be maintained and laparoscopic rectal resection is thought to be noninferior to open resection in the long run even though findings on the quality of the resected specimen are heterogeneous. Accordingly, most guidelines now include a recommendation of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. The limitation with respect to an achievable oncological equivalency of resection takes account of the complexity and the requirements of the intervention only in the setting of rational selection of patients and sufficient experience of the surgeon.Entities:
Keywords: Cancer stage; Colorectal cancer; Laparoscopy; Open surgery; Outcome
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33263772 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-020-01320-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chirurg ISSN: 0009-4722 Impact factor: 0.955