BACKGROUND: The continuum of resistance model contends that respondents lie at one end of a continuum and non-respondents at the other with respect to factors demonstrated to impact on screening participation. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore the validity of this model for the prediction of participation in colorectal cancer screening. METHOD: People aged 50 to 74 years were asked to complete a survey (n = 1,250). Eligible respondents (n = 376, 30 %) were invited to complete a faecal occult blood test (FOBT). The cutoff period for the determination of participation rates was 12 weeks, with a reminder sent at 6 weeks. RESULTS: FOBTs were returned by n = 196 people (132 within 6 weeks, 64 following a reminder). Participation was generally influenced by the same variables in both the first 6 weeks and the second 6 weeks, consistent with the continuum of resistance model. These variables were having known someone with bowel cancer and the social cognitive factor, perceptions of barriers to screening. There is a suggestion, however, that other factors may be differentially associated with early, late and non-participants. CONCLUSION: Participation in screening appears somewhat consistent with the continuum of resistance model in that early and late participants respond to some of the same factors. This suggests that the same messages are relevant to early, late and non-screeners, but further consideration of what other factors may be influencing discrete stages of readiness to participate is necessary.
BACKGROUND: The continuum of resistance model contends that respondents lie at one end of a continuum and non-respondents at the other with respect to factors demonstrated to impact on screening participation. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore the validity of this model for the prediction of participation in colorectal cancer screening. METHOD:People aged 50 to 74 years were asked to complete a survey (n = 1,250). Eligible respondents (n = 376, 30 %) were invited to complete a faecal occult blood test (FOBT). The cutoff period for the determination of participation rates was 12 weeks, with a reminder sent at 6 weeks. RESULTS: FOBTs were returned by n = 196 people (132 within 6 weeks, 64 following a reminder). Participation was generally influenced by the same variables in both the first 6 weeks and the second 6 weeks, consistent with the continuum of resistance model. These variables were having known someone with bowel cancer and the social cognitive factor, perceptions of barriers to screening. There is a suggestion, however, that other factors may be differentially associated with early, late and non-participants. CONCLUSION: Participation in screening appears somewhat consistent with the continuum of resistance model in that early and late participants respond to some of the same factors. This suggests that the same messages are relevant to early, late and non-screeners, but further consideration of what other factors may be influencing discrete stages of readiness to participate is necessary.
Authors: Viviënne M H C J Lahaut; Harrie A M Jansen; Dike van de Mheen; Henk F L Garretsen; Jacqueline E E Verdurmen; Ad van Dijk Journal: Alcohol Alcohol Date: 2003 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.826
Authors: Robin Haring; Dietrich Alte; Henry Völzke; Sybille Sauer; Henri Wallaschofski; Ulrich John; Carsten O Schmidt Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2008-10-01 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: J D Hardcastle; J O Chamberlain; M H Robinson; S M Moss; S S Amar; T W Balfour; P D James; C M Mangham Journal: Lancet Date: 1996-11-30 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Monika Janda; Warren R Stanton; Karen Hughes; Christopher Del Mar; Alexandra Clavarino; Joanne F Aitken; Shilu Tong; Leonie Short; Barbara Leggett; Beth Newman Journal: Asia Pac J Public Health Date: 2003 Impact factor: 1.399
Authors: Tess A Gregory; Carlene Wilson; Amy Duncan; Deborah Turnbull; Stephen R Cole; Graeme Young Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-01-14 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Erin L Symonds; Susanne K Pedersen; Rohan T Baker; David H Murray; Snigdha Gaur; Stephen R Cole; Geetha Gopalsamy; Dileep Mangira; Lawrence C LaPointe; Graeme P Young Journal: Clin Transl Gastroenterol Date: 2016-01-14 Impact factor: 4.488