Literature DB >> 22865004

Exploring the validity of the continuum of resistance model for discriminating early from late and non-uptake of colorectal cancer screening: implications for the design of invitation and reminder letters.

Tess Gregory1, Stephen R Cole, Carlene J Wilson, Ingrid H Flight, Ian T Zajac, Deborah Turnbull, Graeme P Young.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The continuum of resistance model contends that respondents lie at one end of a continuum and non-respondents at the other with respect to factors demonstrated to impact on screening participation.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore the validity of this model for the prediction of participation in colorectal cancer screening.
METHOD: People aged 50 to 74 years were asked to complete a survey (n = 1,250). Eligible respondents (n = 376, 30 %) were invited to complete a faecal occult blood test (FOBT). The cutoff period for the determination of participation rates was 12 weeks, with a reminder sent at 6 weeks.
RESULTS: FOBTs were returned by n = 196 people (132 within 6 weeks, 64 following a reminder). Participation was generally influenced by the same variables in both the first 6 weeks and the second 6 weeks, consistent with the continuum of resistance model. These variables were having known someone with bowel cancer and the social cognitive factor, perceptions of barriers to screening. There is a suggestion, however, that other factors may be differentially associated with early, late and non-participants.
CONCLUSION: Participation in screening appears somewhat consistent with the continuum of resistance model in that early and late participants respond to some of the same factors. This suggests that the same messages are relevant to early, late and non-screeners, but further consideration of what other factors may be influencing discrete stages of readiness to participate is necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22865004     DOI: 10.1007/s12529-012-9254-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Behav Med        ISSN: 1070-5503


  24 in total

1.  A randomised trial of the impact of new faecal haemoglobin test technologies on population participation in screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  S R Cole; G P Young; A Esterman; B Cadd; J Morcom
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.136

2.  Estimating non-response bias in a survey on alcohol consumption: comparison of response waves.

Authors:  Viviënne M H C J Lahaut; Harrie A M Jansen; Dike van de Mheen; Henk F L Garretsen; Jacqueline E E Verdurmen; Ad van Dijk
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.826

Review 3.  Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review.

Authors:  S W Vernon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Cognitive mediators linking social support networks to colorectal cancer screening adherence.

Authors:  Keiko Honda; Marjorie Kagawa-Singer
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2006-08-04

5.  Extended recruitment efforts minimize attrition but not necessarily bias.

Authors:  Robin Haring; Dietrich Alte; Henry Völzke; Sybille Sauer; Henri Wallaschofski; Ulrich John; Carsten O Schmidt
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Examining the role of perceived susceptibility on colorectal cancer screening intention and behavior.

Authors:  Amy McQueen; Sally W Vernon; Alexander J Rothman; Gregory J Norman; Ronald E Myers; Barbara C Tilley
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2010-10

7.  Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J D Hardcastle; J O Chamberlain; M H Robinson; S M Moss; S S Amar; T W Balfour; P D James; C M Mangham
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Using the transtheoretical model to stage screening behavior for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jeanette M Trauth; Bruce S Ling; Joel L Weissfeld; Robert E Schoen; Mutlu Hayran
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2003-06

9.  Knowledge, attitude and intentions related to colorectal cancer screening using faecal occult blood tests in a rural Australian population.

Authors:  Monika Janda; Warren R Stanton; Karen Hughes; Christopher Del Mar; Alexandra Clavarino; Joanne F Aitken; Shilu Tong; Leonie Short; Barbara Leggett; Beth Newman
Journal:  Asia Pac J Public Health       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.399

10.  Demographic, social cognitive and social ecological predictors of intention and participation in screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Tess A Gregory; Carlene Wilson; Amy Duncan; Deborah Turnbull; Stephen R Cole; Graeme Young
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Effects of the Nurse Navigation Program in Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening Behaviors: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Elif Temucin; Nursen O Nahcivan
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  A Blood Test for Methylated BCAT1 and IKZF1 vs. a Fecal Immunochemical Test for Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia.

Authors:  Erin L Symonds; Susanne K Pedersen; Rohan T Baker; David H Murray; Snigdha Gaur; Stephen R Cole; Geetha Gopalsamy; Dileep Mangira; Lawrence C LaPointe; Graeme P Young
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 4.488

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.