Literature DB >> 20658212

Examining the role of perceived susceptibility on colorectal cancer screening intention and behavior.

Amy McQueen1, Sally W Vernon, Alexander J Rothman, Gregory J Norman, Ronald E Myers, Barbara C Tilley.   

Abstract

Although support exists for multiple psychosocial predictors of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, little is known about the relationships among these variables. Understanding the associations between such predictors could refine health behavior theories and inform the design of interventions. In addition to direct effects, we examined whether baseline perceived susceptibility was a moderator of, or was mediated by, changes in other psychosocial determinants of CRC screening intention and behavior. Longitudinal path models were tested using data from 1,001 white male automotive workers who participated in The Next Step Trial. Our sample included workers with no history of CRC who were due for CRC screening but did not complete CRC screening prior to the assessment of hypothesized mediators at year 1 follow-up. Perceived susceptibility interacted differently with four psychosocial constructs in models predicting CRC screening intention or behavior. Perceived susceptibility was independent of perceived benefits, moderated the change in perceived barriers and self-efficacy, and was mediated by the change in family influence. The role of perceived susceptibility was not limited to direct effects but involved mediating and moderating pathways of influence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20658212      PMCID: PMC3161120          DOI: 10.1007/s12160-010-9215-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Behav Med        ISSN: 0883-6612


  44 in total

1.  The Next Step Trial: impact of a worksite colorectal cancer screening promotion program.

Authors:  B C Tilley; S W Vernon; R Myers; K Glanz; M Lu; K Hirst; A R Kristal
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  The role of theory in HIV prevention.

Authors:  M Fishbein
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2000-06

3.  A psychosocial model of sun protection and sunbathing in young women: the impact of health beliefs, attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy for sun protection.

Authors:  K M Jackson; L S Aiken
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.267

4.  Factors associated with intention to undergo annual prostate cancer screening among African American men in Philadelphia.

Authors:  R E Myers; T A Wolf; L McKee; G McGrory; D Y Burgh; G Nelson; G A Nelson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Risk perceptions and participation in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  S J Blalock; B M DeVellis; R A Afifi; R S Sandler
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.267

6.  Experimental evidence for stages of health behavior change: the precaution adoption process model applied to home radon testing.

Authors:  N D Weinstein; J E Lyon; P M Sandman; C L Cuite
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.267

7.  Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Judith Swan; Nancy Breen; Ralph J Coates; Barbara K Rimer; Nancy C Lee
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Patterns and predictors of colorectal cancer test use in the adult U.S. population.

Authors:  Laura C Seeff; Marion R Nadel; Carrie N Klabunde; Trevor Thompson; Jean A Shapiro; Sally W Vernon; Ralph J Coates
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Modeling adherence to colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  R E Myers; E Ross; C Jepson; T Wolf; A Balshem; L Millner; H Leventhal
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  "Is there nothing more practical than a good theory?": Why innovations and advances in health behavior change will arise if interventions are used to test and refine theory.

Authors:  Alexander J Rothman
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2004-07-27       Impact factor: 6.457

View more
  22 in total

1.  Perceived risk for breast cancer and its relationship to mammography in Blacks, Hispanics, and Whites.

Authors:  Heather Orom; Marc T Kiviniemi; Vickie L Shavers; Levi Ross; Willie Underwood
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2012-07-08

2.  Using the interdependence model to understand spousal influence on colorectal cancer screening intentions: a structural equation model.

Authors:  Sharon Manne; Deborah Kashy; David S Weinberg; Joseph A Boscarino; Deborah J Bowen
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2012-06

3.  Cultural, economic, and psychological predictors of colonoscopy in a national sample.

Authors:  Chanita Hughes Halbert; Frances K Barg; Carmen E Guerra; Judy A Shea; Katrina Armstrong; Monica Ferguson; Benita Weathers; James Coyne; Andrea B Troxel
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Impact of a Multifaceted Intervention on Promoting Adherence to Screening Colonoscopy Among Persons in HIV Primary Care: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Pansy Ferron; Shihab S Asfour; Lisa R Metsch; Michael H Antoni; Allan E Rodriguez; Robert Duncan; Sheila M Findlay
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 4.689

5.  Colorectal cancer screening adherence in African-American men and women 50 years of age and older living in Maryland.

Authors:  Richard C Palmer; Dildeep Chhabra; Sheila McKinney
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2011-08

6.  Understanding narrative effects: the impact of breast cancer survivor stories on message processing, attitudes, and beliefs among African American women.

Authors:  Amy McQueen; Matthew W Kreuter; Bindu Kalesan; Kassandra I Alcaraz
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 4.267

7.  Longitudinal predictors of colorectal cancer screening among participants in a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Caitlin C Murphy; Sally W Vernon; Nicole M Haddock; Melissa L Anderson; Jessica Chubak; Beverly B Green
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Deliberative and intuitive risk perceptions as predictors of colorectal cancer screening over time.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hay; Marcel Ramos; Yuelin Li; Susan Holland; Debra Brennessel; M Margaret Kemeny
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-08-18

Review 9.  Does colorectal cancer risk perception predict screening behavior? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas M Atkinson; Talya Salz; Kaitlin K Touza; Yuelin Li; Jennifer L Hay
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-08-18

10.  Exploring the validity of the continuum of resistance model for discriminating early from late and non-uptake of colorectal cancer screening: implications for the design of invitation and reminder letters.

Authors:  Tess Gregory; Stephen R Cole; Carlene J Wilson; Ingrid H Flight; Ian T Zajac; Deborah Turnbull; Graeme P Young
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2013-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.