| Literature DB >> 27045374 |
Guidong Yao1, Jiawei Xu1, Zhimin Xin1, Wenbin Niu1, Senlin Shi1, Haixia Jin1, Wenyan Song1, Enyin Wang1, Qingling Yang1, Lei Chen1, Yingpu Sun1.
Abstract
Clinically discarded human embryos, which are generated from both normal and abnormal fertilizations, have the potential of developing into blastocysts. A total of 1,649 discarded human embryos, including zygotes containing normal (2PN) and abnormal (0PN, 1PN, 3PN and ≥4PN) pronuclei and prematurely cleaved embryos (2Cell), were collected for in vitro culture to investigate their developmental potential and chromosomal constitution using an SNP array-based chromosomal analysis. We found that blastocyst formation rates were 63.8% (for 2Cell embryos), 22.6% (2PN), 16.7% (0PN), 11.2% (3PN) and 3.6% (1PN). SNP array-based chromosomal analysis of the resultant blastocysts revealed that the percentages of normal chromosomes were 55.2% (2Cell), 60.7% (2PN), 44.4% (0PN) and 47.4% (0PN). Compared with clinical preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) data generated with clinically acceptable embryos, results of the SNP array-based chromosome analysis on blastocysts from clinically discarded embryos showed similar values for the frequency of abnormal chromosome occurrence, aberrant signal classification and chromosomal distribution. The present study is perhaps the first systematic analysis of the developmental potential of clinically discarded embryos and provides a basis for future studies.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27045374 PMCID: PMC4820740 DOI: 10.1038/srep23995
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Correlation between percentages of blastocyst formation and high-quality blastocyst formation from different zygotes and prematurely cleaved 2Cell embryos.
Percentages are of blastocyst formation (x-axis) and high-quality blastocyst formation (y-axis).
Blastocyst formation from discarded embryos cultured in vitro.
| Groups | Female age range | Male age range | No. of embryos cultured | No. of blastocysts formed (% embryos) | No. of high-quality blastocysts formed (% blastocysts) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0PN | 22–42 | 23–43 | 90 | 15 (16.7%)abc | 4 (26.7%)a |
| 1PN | 21–43 | 22–40 | 28 | 1 (3.6%)bd | 0 |
| 2PN | 21–42 | 22–45 | 385 | 87 (22.6%)ae | 33 (37.9%)a |
| 3PN | 21–43 | 22–44 | 893 | 100 (11.2%)bf | 18 (18.0%)b |
| ≥4PN | 21–41 | 23–40 | 184 | 6 (3.3%)dg | 0 |
| 2Cell | 22–43 | 24–42 | 69 | 44 (63.8%)h | 17 (38.6%)a |
| Total | 1649 | 253 (15.3%) | 70 (27.7%) |
Note: Different superscripts in the same column indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). High-quality blastocysts represent those with grades equal or higher than 3BB (Day 5) or 4BB (Day 6).
SNP microarray signals from blastocysts and non-blastocysts.
| Group | Blastocysts | Non-blastocysts | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. tested | No. of normal chromosomes (% total) | No. tested | No. of normal chromosomes (% total) | |
| 0PN | 9 | 4 (44.4%)a | – | – |
| 2PN | 61 | 37 (60.7%)a | 36 | 27 (75.0%)a |
| 3PN | 78 | 37 (47.4%)a | 22 | 5 (22.7%)b |
| 2Cell | 29 | 16 (55.2%)a | – | – |
| Total | 177 | 94 (53.1%) | 58 | 32 (55.2%) |
Note: SNP microarray signals from blastocysts and non-blastocysts were subdivided into groups of 0PN, 2PN, 3PN, and premature cleaved 2Cell. Different superscripts in the same column indicate significant differences (P < 0.05), and the same superscripts indicate no significant difference (P > 0.05).
Figure 2Analysis of abnormal SNP array signals.
Frequently-detected abnormal signals following SNP array-based chromosome analysis were analyzed by dividing the number of distinct signals by the number of abnormal signals. “Loss”, lack of an entire chromosome; “Gain”, an increase in the number of copies of a chromosome; “Dele”, segmental chromosome deletion; “Dupl”, segmental chromosome duplication; “Upd”, uniparental disomy. Different alphabets on the histogram indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).
Figure 3SNP array-based chromosome analysis of blastocysts from clinical PGD samples and discarded embryos.
Frequently-detected abnormal signals following SNP microarray analysis were analyzed by dividing the number of distinct signals by the number of abnormal signals. “PGD” refers to data from PGD patients. These data were compared with data generated from blastocysts derived from 2PN-, 0PN-, 3PN-, and 2Cell-derived embryos; other abbreviations are as for Fig. 2.