Literature DB >> 22855232

Single-layer skull approximations perform well in transcranial direct current stimulation modeling.

Sumientra M Rampersad1, Dick F Stegeman, Thom F Oostendorp.   

Abstract

In modeling the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation, the representation of the skull is an important factor. In a spherical model, we compared a realistic skull modeling approach, in which the skull consisted of three isotropic layers, to anisotropic and isotropic single-layer approximations. We simulated direct current stimulation for a range of conductivity values and investigated differences in the resulting current densities. Our results demonstrate that both approximation methods perform well, provided that the optimal conductivity values are used. We found that for both the anisotropic and the isotropic approximations the optimal conductivity values are largely dictated by the equivalent radial conductivity of the three-layered skull.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22855232     DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2206829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng        ISSN: 1534-4320            Impact factor:   3.802


  7 in total

1.  The effect of tissue anisotropy on the radial and tangential components of the electric field in transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Mohamed K Metwally; Seung Moo Han; Tae-Seong Kim
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Comparison of effectiveness between cork-screw and peg-screw electrodes for transcranial motor evoked potential monitoring using the finite element method.

Authors:  Ryosuke Tomio; Takenori Akiyama; Takayuki Ohira; Kazunari Yoshida
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2016-11-11

3.  Sex difference in tDCS current mediated by changes in cortical anatomy: A study across young, middle and older adults.

Authors:  Sagarika Bhattacharjee; Rajan Kashyap; Alicia M Goodwill; Beth Ann O'Brien; Brenda Rapp; Kenichi Oishi; John E Desmond; S H Annabel Chen
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 9.184

4.  Effect of anatomical variability on electric field characteristics of electroconvulsive therapy and magnetic seizure therapy: a parametric modeling study.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Visualizing simulated electrical fields from electroencephalography and transcranial electric brain stimulation: a comparative evaluation.

Authors:  Sebastian Eichelbaum; Moritz Dannhauer; Mario Hlawitschka; Dana Brooks; Thomas R Knösche; Gerik Scheuermann
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (ctDCS): A Novel Approach to Understanding Cerebellar Function in Health and Disease.

Authors:  Giuliana Grimaldi; Georgios P Argyropoulos; Amy Bastian; Mar Cortes; Nicholas J Davis; Dylan J Edwards; Roberta Ferrucci; Felipe Fregni; Joseph M Galea; Masahi Hamada; Mario Manto; R Chris Miall; Leon Morales-Quezada; Paul A Pope; Alberto Priori; John Rothwell; S Paul Tomlinson; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 7.519

7.  Influence of layered skull modeling on the frequency sensitivity and target accuracy in simulations of transcranial current stimulation.

Authors:  Heng Wang; Weiqian Sun; Jianxu Zhang; Zilong Yan; Chenyu Wang; Luyao Wang; Tiantian Liu; Chunlin Li; Duanduan Chen; Funahashi Shintaro; Jinglong Wu; Tianyi Yan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 5.038

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.