Literature DB >> 25055384

Effect of anatomical variability on electric field characteristics of electroconvulsive therapy and magnetic seizure therapy: a parametric modeling study.

Zhi-De Deng, Sarah H Lisanby, Angel V Peterchev.   

Abstract

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and magnetic seizure therapy (MST) are conventionally applied with a fixed stimulus current amplitude, which may result in differences in the neural stimulation strength and focality across patients due to interindividual anatomical variability. The objective of this study is to quantify the effect of head anatomical variability associated with age, sex, and individual differences on the induced electric field characteristics in ECT and MST. Six stimulation modalities were modeled including bilateral and right unilateral ECT, focal electrically administered seizure therapy (FEAST), and MST with circular, cap, and double-cone coils. The electric field was computed using the finite element method in a parameterized spherical head model representing the variability in the general population. Head tissue layer thicknesses and conductivities were varied to examine the impact of interindividual anatomical differences on the stimulation strength, depth, and focality. Skull conductivity most strongly affects the ECT electric field, whereas the MST electric field is independent of tissue conductivity variation in this model but is markedly affected by differences in head diameter. Focal ECT electrode configurations such as FEAST is more sensitive to anatomical variability than that of less focal paradigms such as BL ECT. In MST, anatomical variability has stronger influence on the electric field of the cap and circular coils compared to the double-cone coil, possibly due to the more superficial field of the former. The variability of the ECT and MST electric fields due to anatomical differences should be considered in the interpretation of existing studies and in efforts to improve dosing approaches for better control of stimulation strength and focality across patients, such as individualization of the current amplitude. The conventional approach to individualizing dosage by titrating the number of pulses cannot compensate for differences in the spatial extent of stimulation that result from anatomical variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25055384      PMCID: PMC4289667          DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2339014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng        ISSN: 1534-4320            Impact factor:   3.802


  50 in total

1.  A new method for noninvasive measurement of multilayer tissue conductivity and structure using divided electrodes.

Authors:  Xueli Zhao; Y Kinouchi; E Yasuno; D Gao; T Iritani; T Morimoto; M Takeuchi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Modeling skull electrical properties.

Authors:  R J Sadleir; A Argibay
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Oestrogenic, androgenic and gonadotrophic substances in the urine of normal women; sex hormone analyses.

Authors:  K PEDERSEN-BJERGAARD; M TØNNESEN
Journal:  Acta Endocrinol (Copenh)       Date:  1948

4.  Age and sex differences in averaged evoked responses in a normal population, with observations on patients with gonadal dysgenesis.

Authors:  M S Buchsbaum; R I Henkin; R L Christiansen
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1974-08

5.  Current distribution in the brain from surface electrodes.

Authors:  S Rush; D A Driscoll
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1968 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  The electrical conductivity of human cerebrospinal fluid at body temperature.

Authors:  S B Baumann; D R Wozny; S K Kelly; F M Meno
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Seizure threshold in electroconvulsive therapy: I. Initial seizure threshold.

Authors:  C E Coffey; J Lucke; R D Weiner; A D Krystal; M Aque
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1995-05-15       Impact factor: 13.382

8.  Estimation of in vivo brain-to-skull conductivity ratio in humans.

Authors:  Yingchun Zhang; Wim van Drongelen; Bin He
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  MRI characteristics predicting seizure threshold in patients undergoing electroconvulsive therapy: a prospective study.

Authors:  Jeroen A van Waarde; Lucas J B van Oudheusden; Bart A R Tonino; Nic J A van der Wee; Bastiaan Verwey; Rose C van der Mast; Erik J Giltay
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 8.955

10.  Magnetic brain stimulation and brain size: relevance to animal studies.

Authors:  J D Weissman; C M Epstein; K R Davey
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-06
View more
  17 in total

1.  Redesigning existing transcranial magnetic stimulation coils to reduce energy: application to low field magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Boshuo Wang; Michael R Shen; Zhi-De Deng; J Evan Smith; Joseph J Tharayil; Clement J Gurrey; Luis J Gomez; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Neurocognitive Effects of Combined Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) and Venlafaxine in Geriatric Depression: Phase 1 of the PRIDE Study.

Authors:  Sarah H Lisanby; Shawn M McClintock; George Alexopoulos; Samuel H Bailine; Elisabeth Bernhardt; Mimi C Briggs; C Munro Cullum; Zhi-De Deng; Mary Dooley; Emma T Geduldig; Robert M Greenberg; Mustafa M Husain; Styliani Kaliora; Rebecca G Knapp; Vassilios Latoussakis; Lauren S Liebman; William V McCall; Martina Mueller; Georgios Petrides; Joan Prudic; Peter B Rosenquist; Matthew V Rudorfer; Shirlene Sampson; Abeba A Teklehaimanot; Kristen G Tobias; Richard D Weiner; Robert C Young; Charles H Kellner
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 4.105

Review 3.  The development and modelling of devices and paradigms for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Zhi-De Deng
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2017-04-26

4.  Accuracy of robotic coil positioning during transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; I Cassie Kozyrkov; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby; David L K Murphy; Warren M Grill; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Individualized Low-Amplitude Seizure Therapy: Minimizing Current for Electroconvulsive Therapy and Magnetic Seizure Therapy.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Andrew D Krystal; Moacyr A Rosa; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 7.853

6.  Minimum Electric Field Exposure for Seizure Induction with Electroconvulsive Therapy and Magnetic Seizure Therapy.

Authors:  Won H Lee; Sarah H Lisanby; Andrew F Laine; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  Electric Field Model of Transcranial Electric Stimulation in Nonhuman Primates: Correspondence to Individual Motor Threshold.

Authors:  Won Hee Lee; Sarah H Lisanby; Andrew F Laine; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 8.  Neuromodulation for mood and memory: from the engineering bench to the patient bedside.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Shawn M McClintock; Nicodemus E Oey; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  Comparison of electric field strength and spatial distribution of electroconvulsive therapy and magnetic seizure therapy in a realistic human head model.

Authors:  W H Lee; S H Lisanby; A F Laine; A V Peterchev
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 5.361

Review 10.  Noninvasive neuromodulation of the prefrontal cortex in mental health disorders.

Authors:  William T Regenold; Zhi-De Deng; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 7.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.