Literature DB >> 25074553

Disposable devices for RIRS: where do we stand in 2013? What do we need in the future?

Richard H Shin1, Michael E Lipkin, Glenn M Preminger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Disposable devices for retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) form a significant part of the urologist's armamentarium for the endoscopic management of urologic diseases. Herein, we provide an overview of the literature regarding the advances and controversies of these devices.
METHODS: A PubMed search was used to identify the literature discussing the subject of disposable devices for RIRS. Articles published between 2012 and 2013 were considered.
RESULTS: Ureteral access implements including access sheaths, wires, and dilators are an area of both improvement and controversy regarding their proper use. The safety, effectiveness, and limitations of lithotrites continue to be refined. Stone retrieval devices are undergoing persistent miniaturization, and their use may prove to be cost effective. The debate over perioperative stenting remains, while symptom management is explored. A cost-effective option for disposable flexible ureteroscopy shows promise.
CONCLUSIONS: While rapid advances in technology and knowledge continue, continual improvements are necessary. Disposable equipment needs persistent refinement and possible miniaturization. More efficient fragment retrieval devices are needed. Durability of laser fibers and safety within ureteroscopes needs to be improved. Reducing stent morbidity remains an ongoing challenge. Lastly, costs need to be reduced by the further development of disposable flexible ureteroscopes and in the recyclability of disposable devices to improve availability worldwide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25074553     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-014-1368-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  39 in total

1.  Systematic evaluation of hybrid guidewires: shaft stiffness, lubricity, and tip configuration.

Authors:  Carl Sarkissian; Emily Korman; Kari Hendlin; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Systematic evaluation of a novel foot-pump ureteroscopic irrigation system.

Authors:  Kari Hendlin; Carl Sarkissian; Branden Duffey; Manoj Monga
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Cardiovascular events associated with rofecoxib in a colorectal adenoma chemoprevention trial.

Authors:  Robert S Bresalier; Robert S Sandler; Hui Quan; James A Bolognese; Bettina Oxenius; Kevin Horgan; Christopher Lines; Robert Riddell; Dion Morton; Angel Lanas; Marvin A Konstam; John A Baron
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  1.2 French stone retrieval baskets further enhance irrigation flow in flexible ureterorenoscopy.

Authors:  Jens Bedke; Ulf Leichtle; Andrea Lorenz; Udo Nagele; Arnulf Stenzl; Stephan Kruck
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Emergency double-J stent insertion following uncomplicated Ureteroscopy: risk-factor analysis and recommendations.

Authors:  Yousef S Matani; Mohammed A Al-Ghazo; Rami S Al-azab; Osamah Bani-hani; Daher K Rabadi
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

6.  Meta-analysis of postoperatively stenting or not in patients underwent ureteroscopic lithotripsy.

Authors:  Turun Song; Banghua Liao; Shuo Zheng; Qiang Wei
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-05-15

7.  A safety guidewire influences the pushing and pulling forces needed to move the ureteroscope in the ureter: a clinical randomized, crossover study.

Authors:  Øyvind Ulvik; Tore Wentzel-Larsen; Nils M Ulvik
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  The use of a ureteral access sheath does not improve stone-free rate after ureteroscopy for upper urinary tract stones.

Authors:  Gaetan Berquet; Paul Prunel; Grégory Verhoest; Romain Mathieu; Karim Bensalah
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on stone-free rates of ureteroscopy for nephroureterolithiasis: a matched-paired analysis of 286 patients.

Authors:  Christopher Netsch; Sophie Knipper; Thorsten Bach; Thomas R W Herrmann; Andreas J Gross
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Controversies in ureteroscopy: Wire, basket, and sheath.

Authors:  Emad R Rizkala; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2013-07
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  [Ureterorenoscopy].

Authors:  A J Gross; J Rassweiler; K D Sievert; A Miernik; J Westphal; H Leyh; T R W Herrmann; P Olbert; A Häcker; A Bachmann; R Homberg; J Klein; M Schoenthaler; C Netsch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Calculating the cost of reusable materials in endourological stone surgeries.

Authors:  Haluk Soylemez; Tahsin Batuhan Aydogan
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Difference of opinion--In the era of flexible ureteroscopy is there still a place for Shock-wave lithotripsy? Opinion: NO.

Authors:  Fabio C Vicentini
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 4.  The Single Wire Ureteral Access Sheath, Both Safe and Economical.

Authors:  Joan C Delto; George Wayne; Ajaydeep Sidhu; Rafael Yanes; Akshay Bhandari; Alan M Nieder
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2016-11-15

5.  LithoVue™: A new single-use digital flexible ureteroscope.

Authors:  Salvatore Butticè; Tarik Emre Sener; Christopher Netsch; Esteban Emiliani; Rosa Pappalardo; Carlo Magno
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2016-08-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.