Literature DB >> 22854064

Locoregional extension patterns of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and suggestions for clinical target volume delineation.

Wen-Fei Li1, Ying Sun, Mo Chen, Ling-Long Tang, Li-Zhi Liu, Yan-Ping Mao, Lei Chen, Guan-Qun Zhou, Li Li, Jun Ma.   

Abstract

Clinical target volume (CTV) delineation is crucial for tumor control and normal tissue protection. This study aimed to define the locoregional extension patterns of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and to improve CTV delineation. Magnetic resonance imaging scans of 2366 newly diagnosed NPC patients were reviewed. According to incidence rates of tumor invasion, the anatomic sites surrounding the nasopharynx were classified into high-risk (>30%), medium-risk (5%-30%), and low-risk (<5%) groups. The lymph node (LN) level was determined according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group guidelines, which were further categorized into the upper neck (retropharyngeal region and level II), middle neck (levels III and Va), and lower neck (levels IV and Vb and the supraclavicular fossa). The high-risk anatomic sites were adjacent to the nasopharynx, whereas those at medium-or low-risk were separated from the nasopharynx. If the high-risk anatomic sites were involved, the rates of tumor invasion into the adjacent medium-risk sites increased; if not, the rates were significantly lower (P<0.01). Among the 1920 (81.1%) patients with positive LN, the incidence rates of LN metastasis in the upper, middle, and lower neck were 99.6%, 30.2%, and 7.2%, respectively, and skip metastasis happened in only 1.2% of patients. In the 929 patients who had unilateral upper neck involvement, the rates of contralateral middle neck and lower neck involvement were 1.8% and 0.4%, respectively. Thus, local disease spreads stepwise from proximal sites to distal sites, and LN metastasis spreads from the upper neck to the lower neck. Individualized CTV delineation for NPC may be feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22854064      PMCID: PMC3777458          DOI: 10.5732/cjc.012.10095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin J Cancer        ISSN: 1944-446X


Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) has an extremely unbalanced endemic distribution, and it is prevalent in southern China, with Chinese accounting for 40% of all incident NPC cases worldwide[1]; thus, NPC is also known as the “Cantonese cancer”. Radiotherapy is the mainstay treatment modality for NPC. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has gradually replaced two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy as the primary means of radiotherapy because of better tumor target coverage and normal tissue sparing. With the application of IMRT, the treatment outcome and quality of life for NPC patients have been greatly improved[2]–[6]. IMRT requires the delineation of target volumes on cross-sectional imaging; precise target volume delineation is crucial for tumor control and normal tissue protection because of the highly conformal radiation dose distribution in IMRT. According to the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) reports 50[7] and 62[8], the gross tumor volume (GTV) consists of primary tumor and metastatic lympha-denopathy. In addition, clinical tumor volume (CTV) can be subdivided into CTV1 (high-risk subclinical disease) and CTV2 (low-risk subclinical disease), though the optimal delineation has not been determined. Better understanding the locoregional extension patterns of NPC will directly impact individualized CTV delineation. Therefore, we reviewed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of a large sample of NPC patients and documented the patterns of locoregional extension of NPC, aiming to improve CTV delineation.

Materials and Methods

Patients

A total of 2366 patients with non-distant metastatic and histologically proven NPC newly diagnosed between January 2003 and December 2008 were included in our study. All patients completed a pre-treatment evaluation that included physical examination, nasopharyngeal fiberoptic endoscopy, MRI scan of the nasopharynx and neck, chest radiography, abdominal sonography, and whole body bone scan. Additionally, 184(7.8%) patients underwent 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT). Medical records and imaging studies were analyzed, and all patients were restaged according to the 7th edition of the Union for International Cancer Control/American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC/AJCC) staging system[9]. Patient clinicopathologic characteristics are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.

Clinicopathologic characteristics of the 2366 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients

CharacteristicNo. of patients (%)
Gender
 Male1775 (75.0)
 Female591 (25.0)
Age (years)
 >50766 (32.4)
 ≤ 501600 (67.6)
Histology
 WHO type I4 (0.2)
 WHO type II/III2362 (99.8)
Radiotherapy
 Two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy1540 (65.1)
 Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy17 (0.7)
 Intensity-modulated radiotherapy809 (34.2)
Chemotherapy
 Yes1615 (68.3)
 Concurrent chemoradiotherapy621 (26.2)
 Neoadjuvant + concurrent chemoradiotherapy442 (18.7)
 Concurrent chemoradiotherapy + adjuvant117 (4.9)
 Others435 (18.4)
 No751 (31.7)
T category
 T1481 (20.3)
 T2525 (22.2)
 T3868 (36.7)
 T4492 (20.8)
N category
 N0446 (18.9)
 N11288 (54.4)
 N2452 (19.1)
 N3180 (7.6)
Stage
 I161 (6.8)
 II580 (24.5)
 III978 (41.3)
 IVa467 (19.7)
 IVb180 (7.6)

Imaging protocol

All patients underwent MRI using a 1.5-T system (Signa CV/i; General Electric Healthcare, Chalfont St. Giles, United Kingdom) to examine the region from the suprasellar cistern to the inferior margin at the sternal end of the clavicle with a head-and-neck combined coil. T1-weighted fast spin-echo images in the axial, coronal, and sagittal planes (repetition time 500–600 ms, echo time 10–20 ms, 22-cm field of view) and T2-weighted fast spin-echo images in the axial plane (repetition time 4000–6000 ms, echo time 95–110 ms, 22-cm field of view) were obtained before injection of contrast material. After intravenous administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA; Magnevist, Schering, Berlin, Germany) at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg, T1-weighted spin-echo axial and sagittal sequences and T1-weighted spin-echo fat-suppressed coronal sequences were performed sequentially with the same parameters prior to Gd-DTPA injection, using a section thickness of 5 mm and a matrix size of 512 × 512.

Image assessment and diagnostic criteria

Two radiologists specializing in head-and-neck cancers evaluated all scans separately, and any disagreements were resolved by consensus. The anatomic sites surrounding the nasopharynx are listed in Table 2. Nasal cavity invasion was defined as the tumor invading the bony nasal septum, turbinate or exceeding beyond the line connecting bilateral pterygopalatine fossae[9]–[12]. Oropharyngeal involvement was defined as tumor involvement below the plane of the superior surface of the soft palate or the lower margin of C1[9],[12]–[14]. Hypopharyn geal involvement was defined as tumor detection below the plane of the superior border of the hyoid bone or the lower margin of C3[9],[10],[12]. Infratemporal fossa involvement was defined as extension beyond the anterior surface of the lateral pterygoid muscle or lateral extension beyond the posterolateral wall of the maxillary sinus or pterygomaxillary fissure[15]. The criterion for orbit invasion was the tumor extending to the orbital apex, the inferior orbital fissure, or the superior orbital fissure[16]. Bilateral NPC was defined as the primary tumor extending across the midline of the nasopharynx[17]. According to incidence rates of tumor invasion, the anatomic sites surrounding the nasopharynx were classified into high-risk (>30%), medium-risk (5%–30%), and low-risk (<5%) groups.
Table 2.

Rates of tumor invasion into anatomic sites surrounding the nasopharynx

Anatomic siteNo. of patients (%)
High-risk
 Tensor veli palatine muscle1570 (66.4)
 Nasal cavity1224 (51.7)
 Basis of sphenoid bone1105 (46.7)
 Pterygoid process1063 (44.9)
 Clivus934 (39.5)
 Petrous apex932 (39.4)
 Prevertebral muscle876 (37.0)
 Foramen lacerum826 (34.9)
Medium-risk
 Foramen ovale557 (23.5)
 Great wing of sphenoid bone554 (23.4)
 Oropharynx509 (21.5)
 Medial pterygoid muscle449 (19.0)
 Cavernous sinus424 (17.9)
 Pterygopalatine fossa407 (17.2)
 Sphenoidal sinus374 (15.8)
 Hypoglossal canal256 (10.8)
 Lateral pterygoid muscle219 (9.3)
 Ethmoid sinus124 (5.2)
 Jugular foramen120 (5.1)
Low-risk
 Orbit93 (3.9)
 Infratemporal fossa73 (3.1)
 Cervical vertebrae54 (2.3)
 Maxillary sinus51 (2.2)
 Hypopharynx21 (0.9)
 Frontal sinus5 (0.2)
The diagnostic criteria for lymph node (LN) metastases[18],[19] included (a) lateral retropharyngeal lymph node (RLN) with a minimal axial diameter (MID) of ≥5 mm in the largest plane or any node in the median retropharyngeal group; (b) cervical lymph node (CLN) in the jugulodigastric region with a MID ≥11 mm or all other CLNs ≥10 mm; (c) LNs of any size with central necrosis or a contrast-enhanced rim; (d) nodal grouping, the presence of 3 or more aggregated LNs, each having an MID of 8 to 10 mm; and (e) LNs of any size with extracapsular spread as characterized by irregular LN capsular enhancement, obliterated fat space between the node and adjacent tissues, and/or confluent LNs. The assignment of LN location was made according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) guidelines[20],[21]. Using the superior border of the hyoid bone and the lower border of the cricoid cartilage as two separators, we further categorized the neck node levels into three volumes: upper neck, which included retropharyngeal region (RP) and level II; middle neck, which included levels III and Va; and lower neck, which included levels IV and Vb and the supraclavicular fossa (SCF).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 13.0 (Chicago, IL, USA). The Chi-square test was used to examine differences between categorical variables, and two-tailed P values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Characteristics and pattern of local tumor extension

The cumulative rates of tumor invasion into the anatomic sites surrounding the nasopharynx are shown in Table 2. The tensor veli palatine muscle (TVPM) had the highest involvement rate (66.4%), followed by the nasal cavity (51.7%). The anatomic sites at high risk included the TVPM, nasal cavity, basis of sphenoid bone, pterygoid process, clivus, petrous apex, prevertebral muscle, and foramen lacerum. The medium-risk anatomic sites included the foramen ovale, great wing of the sphenoid bone, oropharynx, medial pterygoid muscle, cavernous sinus, pterygopalatine fossa, sphenoidal sinus, hypoglossal canal, lateral pterygoid muscle, ethmoid sinus, and jugular foramen. The low-risk sites included the orbit, infratemporal fossa, cervical vertebrae, maxillary sinus, hypopharynx, and frontal sinus. Thus, the high-risk anatomic sites were adjacent to the nasopharynx, whereas those at medium or low risk were separated from the nasopharynx (except the oropharynx). If high-risk anatomic sites were involved, the rates of tumor invasion into the adjacent medium-risk sites increased; if not, the rates were significantly lower (P < 0.01) (Table 3). For example, when the tumor invaded the TVPM, 28.5% of patients had medial pterygoid muscle involvement; in contrast, when the TVPM was not involved, only 0.3% of patients had medial pterygoid muscle involvement. Similarly, the rate of tumor invasion into the cavernous sinus reached more than 40% if the clivus, petrous apex, and/or foramen lacerum were involved; if not, the rate was lower than 3%.
Table 3.

Relationship between tumor invasion into anatomic sites at high risk and invasion into the adjacent medium-risk anatomic sites

Medium-risk siteTumor invasionP
Tensor veli palatine muscle
InvasionNon-invasion
Foramen ovale33.9% (533/1570)3.0% (24/796)< 0.01
Great wing of sphenoid bone33.8% (531/1570)2.9% (23/796)< 0.01
Medial pterygoid muscle28.5% (447/1570)0.3% (2/796)< 0.01
Oropharynx28.3% (445/1570)8.0% (64/796)< 0.01
Pterygopalatine fossa24.1% (378/1570)3.6% (29/796)< 0.01
Nasal cavity
InvasionNon-invasion
Pterygopalatine fossa29.4% (360/1224)4.1% (47/1142)< 0.01
Ethmoid sinus9.2% (113/1224)1.0% (11/1142)< 0.01
Basis of sphenoid bone
InvasionNon-invasion
Great wing of sphenoid bone48.8% (539/1105)1.2% (15/1261)< 0.01
Foramen ovale47.5% (525/1105)2.5% (32/1261)< 0.01
Sphenoidal sinus33.1% (366/1105)0.6% (8/1261)< 0.01
Pterygoid process
InvasionNon-invasion
Great wing of sphenoid bone49.1% (522/1063)2.5% (32/1303)< 0.01
Foramen ovale48.4% (515/1063)3.2% (42/1303)< 0.01
Medial pterygoid muscle37.7% (401/1063)3.7% (48/1303)< 0.01
Pterygopalatine fossa36.9% (392/1063)1.2% (15/1303)< 0.01
Lateral pterygoid muscle19.4% (206/1063)1.0% (13/1303)< 0.01
Clivus
InvasionNon-invasion
Great wing of sphenoid bone54.0% (504/934)3.5% (50/1432)< 0.01
Foramen ovale52.5% (490/934)4.7% (67/1432)< 0.01
Cavernous sinus42.4% (396/934)2.0% (28/1432)< 0.01
Sphenoidal sinus36.3% (339/934)2.4% (35/1432)< 0.01
Hypoglossal canal26.6% (248/934)0.6% (8/1432)< 0.01
Jugular foramen12.5% (117/934)0.2% (3/1432)< 0.01
Petrous apex
InvasionNon-invasion
Foramen ovale54.8% (511/932)3.2% (46/1434)< 0.01
Great wing of sphenoid bone54.4% (507/932)3.3% (47/1434)< 0.01
Cavernous sinus42.8% (399/932)1.7% (25/1434)< 0.01
Hypoglossal canal27.0% (252/932)0.3% (4/1434)< 0.01
Jugular foramen12.8% (119/932)0.1% (1/1434)< 0.01
Prevertebral muscle
InvasionNon-invasion
Oropharynx32.6% (286/876)15.0% (223/1490)< 0.01
Hypoglossal canal26.9% (236/876)1.3% (20/1490)< 0.01
Jugular foramen11.9% (104/876)1.1% (16/1490)< 0.01
Foramen lacerum
InvasionNon-invasion
Foramen ovale57.9% (478/826)5.1% (79/1540)< 0.01
Great wing of sphenoid bone56.7% (468/826)5.6% (86/1540)< 0.01
Cavernous sinus46.4% (383/826)2.7% (41/1540)< 0.01
Among all patients, 94% had bilateral NPC, and most had tumor invasion of the superior-posterior wall and extending across the midline of the nasopharynx. However, most anatomic sites were at low risk of concurrent bilateral tumor invasion (<10%) except the TVPM (13.8%) and prevertebral muscle (13%).

Characteristics and pattern of LN metastasis

In this cohort of patients, the rate of LN metastasis was 81.1% (1920/2366), and bilateral LN involvement was observed in 52.3% (1004/1920) of patients. Among the neck node levels according to the RTOG guidelines, RP (84.8%, 1628/1920) and level IIb (61.5%, 1181/1920) were the most frequently involved regions, followed in order by levels IIa, III, Va, IV, Vb, SCF, and Ib. No LN metastasis was found in the retrostyloid space or in levels Ia or VI (Table 4).
Table 4.

Characteristics of nodal spread of the 1920 patients with node-positive NPC

LevelNo. of patients (%)
Retropharyngeal region1628 (84.8)
Level IIb1181 (61.5)
Level IIa706 (36.8)
Level III545 (28.4)
Level Va155 (8.1)
Level IV102 (5.3)
Level Vb50 (2.6)
Supraclavicular fossa46 (2.4)
Level Ib39 (2.0)
In the 1920 patients with positive LNs, the involvement rates of upper neck (RP and level II), middle neck (levels III and Va) and lower neck (levels IV, Vb, and SCF) were 99.6% (1912/1920), 30.2% (579/1920) and 7.2% (139/1920), respectively, and skip metastasis occurred in only 1.2% (23/1920) of patients (Figure 1). In the 929 patients who had unilateral upper neck involvement, the involvement rates of ipsilateral middle neck and lower neck were 19.5% (181/929) and 4.3% (40/929), respectively, whereas the involvement rates of contralateral middle neck and lower neck were only 1.8% (17/929) and 0.4% (4/929), respectively. However, in the 983 patients with bilateral upper neck involvement, the rates of LN metastasis to the middle neck and lower neck increased to 39.2% (385/983) and 9.6% (94/983), respectively.
Figure 1.

The pattern of lymph node metastasis.

RLN, retropharyngeal lymph node; SCF, supraclavicular fossa.

The pattern of lymph node metastasis.

RLN, retropharyngeal lymph node; SCF, supraclavicular fossa.

Discussion

The CTV in IMRT planning for NPC includes CTV1 and CTV2. CTV1 is defined as high-risk regions including GTV (the primary tumor and RLN) plus a 5- to 10-mm margin and the entire nasopharyngeal mucosa plus a 5-mm submucosal volume. CTV2 includes the low-risk areas of the nasopharynx and neck that need prophylactic irradiation, but the optimal region remains controversial[3]–[6],[22],[23]. In some treatment centers, there is no CTV2 but CTV1 in NPC treatment planning, and the region of CTV1 is similar to that of CTV2. At treatment centers in North America[23], Hong Kong[3], and Singapore[4], CTV2 includes the entire nasopharynx, posterior 1/4 to 1/3 of the nasal cavity and maxillary sinuses, parapharyngeal space, pterygoid fossae, anterior 1/2 to 2/3 of the clivus (entire clivus, if involved), skull base (foramen ovale bilaterally), inferior sphenoid sinus, cavernous sinus, and bilateral RP, and levels II–IV (Table 5). Although locoregional control rates greater than 90% have been reported in these centers, the method of CTV2 delineation was largely derived from the experience of conventional radiotherapy, which encompassed most anatomic sites surrounding the nasopharynx bilaterally and did not differ according to the clinical stage. Thus, this delineation method is suboptimal and lacks individualization. Ng et al.[24] reported the patterns of failure after IMRT in 193 NPC patients and found that most of the locoregional failure occurred “in field” (within the 95% isodose lines), whereas marginal or outside-field failure was uncommon. Therefore, whether the volume of CTV2 can be selectively reduced to better protect normal tissue without affecting local tumor control has become a research focus in the field of IMRT planning for NPC.
Table 5.

Differences of delineation of clinical target volume (CTV, for CTV2) in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for NPC in different cancer centers

RegionRTOG0615[23]Singapore[4]Hong Kong[3]Fuzhou[5]Chinese guideline[22]
Nasal cavityPosterior 1/4–1/3Posterior 1/3Posterior 1/35 mm anterior to the posterior nasal aperturePosterior part
Maxillary sinusPosterior 1/4–1/3Posterior 1/3Posterior 1/35 mm anterior to the maxillary mucosa5 mm anterior to the maxillary mucosa
ClivusAnterior 1/2–2/3 (entire if involved)Anterior 1/2 (entire if involved)Anterior 1/2 (entire if involved)Anterior 1/3Anterior 1/3
Foramen ovaleBilaterallyBilaterallyBilaterallyBilaterally
Sphenoid sinusInferior part (entire in T3–T4 disease)IncludedIncludedInferior part (entire if involved)Inferior wall/basis
Cavernous sinusIncluded in high-risk patients (T3, T4, bulky disease involving the roof of the nasopharynx)IncludedIncludedInferior part
Retropharyngeal lymph nodeBilaterally (skull base to cranial edge of the hyoid)Bilaterally (skull base to the level of the hyoid)Bilaterally (skull base to the bottom of the hyoid)Bilaterally (skull base to cranial edge of C2)Bilaterally (skull base to caudal edge of C2)
Levels II–VBilaterallyBilaterallyElectively irradiatedBilaterallyElectively irradiated
Level IbBilaterally included in node-positive patientsIncluded if the ipsilateral neck involvedElectively irradiatedElectively irradiated
Recently, Lin et al.[5] reported that IMRT using a reduced-CTV2 technique (Table 5) for NPC provided favorable 3-year local control, regional control, and overall survival rates of 95%, 98%, and 90%, respectively. In total, 10 of the 12 cases with local recurrence occurred within the GTV, and 2 additional cases recurred locally with a component out of the GTV. No isolated recurrence was found at the margin of the reduced CTV2. Among the 6 patients with regional recurrence, 4 recurred within the CTV2, and 2 additional cases recurred within the region of the spared parotid gland. Tang et al.[25] compared the prognosis of 138 NPC patients with N0 disease with or without prophylactic lower neck irradiation. None of the patients in either group experienced regional failure, and the risks of distant metastasis did not differ statistically. Gao et al.[26] retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 410 patients with LN-negative NPC. CTV2 in the neck only included bilateral RP and levels II, III, and Va, instead of whole-neck irradiation. In a median follow-up of 54 months, 4 patients developed LN recurrence: 3 had nodal recurrences occurred in level II, and only 1 had outside-field LN recurrence in level IV. The above results suggest that individualized radiotherapy with reduced CTV2 in treating NPC is feasible. The delineation of CTV2 should be designed individually based on the GTV, the locoregional extension patterns, and the biological nature of NPC, so that unnecessary or missed irradiation can be avoided[17]. For the local extension pattern, we classified the anatomic sites surrounding the nasopharynx into high-risk, medium-risk, and low-risk groups, and found that the risk of tumor invasion into various anatomic sites was closely correlated with the distance to the nasopharynx and whether the adjacent anatomic sites were involved. The anatomic sites at high risk, such as the TVPM, nasal cavity, and basis of sphenoid bone, were adjacent to the nasopharynx, whereas the anatomic sites at medium or low risk (except oropharynx) were distant from the nasopharynx and separated from it by other anatomic sites. If the high-risk anatomic sites were involved, the rates of tumor invasion into the adjacent medium-risk sites increased; if not, the rates were significantly lower (P < 0.01). The results of this study indicate that local disease spreads stepwise from proximal sites to distal sites, and a skip pattern of local extension is unusual, which further confirms the findings of Liang et al.[17]. Notably, in some cases, the rates of tumor invasion into the anatomic sites at medium risk still reached more than 5%, even when the adjacent high-risk sites were not involved. For example, oropharyngeal involvement had a rate of 8%–15% without TVPM and/or prevertebral muscle involvement, which indicated that NPC could directly invade the oropharynx through submucosal infiltration. There is a complicated relationship between the various anatomic sites s urrounding the nasopharynx, and an anatomic site is usually adjacent to various structures and connected with other distant sites through natural cavity and neural foramina. Dubrulle et al.[27] and Liang et al.[17] reported several common pathways of local NPC extension. The well-known routes included tumor invasion into the cavernous sinus through the foramen lacerum and/or foramen ovale, involvement of the infratemporal fossa through pterygopalatine fossa, and others. Thus, whether the anatomic site should be included in CTV2 may not only depend on if adjacent sites are involved. Because NPC has multiple focus origins and usually involves both sides of the nasopharynx, we recommend that bilateral anatomic sites at high risk (i.e., the parapharyngeal space, posterior part of nasal cavity, pterygoid process, prevertebral muscle, clivus, petrous apex, foramen lacerum, and basis of the sphenoid bone), as well as other high-risk neural foramina (i.e., the pterygopalatine fossa and foramen ovale bilaterally) should be included in CTV2, which is similar to the definition of CTV2 in the 2010 Chinese Consensus Guidelines for NPC IMRT planning (Table 5)[22]. However, the decision to include anatomic sites at medium or low risk in the definition of CTV2 should be based on multiple factors, including the distance from GTV, involvement of the ipsilateral adjacent anatomic sites, and the common routes of tumor spread, to maximize the tumor-killing and normal tissue-protecting effects and achieve individualized treatment. For the pattern of LN metastasis, Tang et al.[25] showed that RP and level II were the first echelon of LN metastasis in NPC, with levels III and V being the second echelon, and levels IV and SCF being the third echelon. In the current study, we used the superior border of the hyoid bone and lower border of the cricoid cartilage as two separators and categorized the RTOG guidelines into upper neck (RP and level II), middle neck (levels III and Va), and lower neck (levels IV, Vb, and SCF). We found that the rates of LN metastasis to the upper, middle, and lower neck decreased successively, and skip metastasis happened only in 1.2% of patients. Moreover, in patients with unilateral upper neck involvement, the involvement rates of ipsilateral middle neck and lower neck were 19.5% and 4.3% respectively, whereas the involvement rates of contralateral middle or lower neck were less than 2%. However, when the bilateral upper neck was involved, the rates of LN metastasis to the middle or lower neck markedly increased. Our results confirm that LN metastasis spreads from upper neck to lower neck, and skip metastasis is unusual, which concurs with the findings of Tang et al.[25]. Tomita et al.[28] investigated the pattern of LN metastasis in unilateral NPC and found that the involvement rates of contralateral RLN and level II were 10% and 16%, respectively, whereas less than 3% of patients had involvement of contralateral levels III, IV, and/or V. Thus, the authors indicated that contralateral LN areas other than RLN and level II could be omitted in patients with unilateral NPC. In this study, 94% of patients had bilateral NPC, and the relationship between the laterality of local disease and LN metastasis was not analyzed. Therefore, we recommend that for patients with N0 disease, CTV2 should only include bilateral RP and levels II, III, and Va. For patients with unilateral LN involvement, CTV2 can include whole ipsilateral neck and contralateral RP and levels II, III, and Va; for patients with bilateral LN involvement, bilateral whole neck should be included. The 2010 Chinese Consensus Guidelines were similar to our recommendations on the setting of nodal CTV2. However, they separated RLNs from CLNs and proposed that the CTV2 of RLN should refer to that of the primary disease because of their close relation. Furthermore, for patients with RLN metastasis alone, CTV2 can only include bilateral RP and levels II, III, and Va[22]. Several studies have indicated that both RLNs and level II nodes are the first-echelon nodes in NPC[25],[29], and RLN metastasis has been classified as N1 disease[9],[10]. Thus, the nodal CTV2 for patients with RLN metastasis should be the same as that for patients with level II involvement. Most recently, Ou et al.[30] reviewed records of 119 NPC patients with RLN metastasis alone and found that the treatment outcome of elective irradiation to RP and levels II, III, and Va was not inferior to that of whole neck irradiation; however, these results need to be confirmed with prospective data. In conclusion, we showed in this large sample size, retrospective study that local disease spread stepwise from proximal sites to distal sites, that LN metastasis spread from upper neck to lower neck in NPC, and that a skip pattern of local extension and LN metastasis was unusual. Elective radiation of the anatomic sites surrounding the nasopharynx and the RTOG guidelines for neck levels may be feasible. However, our recommendations for individualized CTV delineation for NPC should be considered suggestive and not definitive until these results can be confirmed by large prospective studies.
  23 in total

1.  CT-based delineation of lymph node levels and related CTVs in the node-negative neck: DAHANCA, EORTC, GORTEC, NCIC,RTOG consensus guidelines.

Authors:  Vincent Grégoire; Peter Levendag; Kian K Ang; Jacques Bernier; Marijel Braaksma; Volker Budach; Cliff Chao; Emmanuel Coche; Jay S Cooper; Guy Cosnard; Avraham Eisbruch; Samy El-Sayed; Bahman Emami; Cai Grau; Marc Hamoir; Nancy Lee; Philippe Maingon; Karin Muller; Hervé Reychler
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Cervical lymph node metastasis: assessment of radiologic criteria.

Authors:  M W van den Brekel; H V Stel; J A Castelijns; J J Nauta; I van der Waal; J Valk; C J Meyer; G B Snow
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Treatment outcome of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with retropharyngeal lymph nodes metastasis only and the feasibility of elective neck irradiation.

Authors:  Xiaomin Ou; Chunying Shen; Lin Kong; Xiaoshen Wang; Jianhui Ding; Yunsheng Gao; Tingting Xu; Chaosu Hu
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 5.337

4.  Proposal for the delineation of the nodal CTV in the node-positive and the post-operative neck.

Authors:  Vincent Grégoire; Avraham Eisbruch; Marc Hamoir; Peter Levendag
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging of retropharyngeal lymph node metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: patterns of spread.

Authors:  Li-Zhi Liu; Guo-Yi Zhang; Chuang-Miao Xie; Xue-Wen Liu; Chun-Yan Cui; Li Li
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Prognostic factors in 677 patients in Singapore with nondisseminated nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  D M Heng; J Wee; K W Fong; L G Lian; V K Sethi; E T Chua; T L Yang; H S Khoo Tan; K S Lee; K M Lee; T Tan; E J Chua
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an update of the UCSF experience.

Authors:  Nancy Lee; Ping Xia; Jeanne M Quivey; Khalil Sultanem; Ian Poon; Clayton Akazawa; Pam Akazawa; Vivian Weinberg; Karen K Fu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with intensity-modulated radiotherapy: the Hong Kong experience.

Authors:  Michael K M Kam; Peter M L Teo; Ricky M C Chau; K Y Cheung; Peter H K Choi; W H Kwan; S F Leung; Benny Zee; Anthony T C Chan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Nasopharyngeal carcinoma with orbital invasion.

Authors:  W-M Hsu; A-G Wang
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 10.  Extension patterns of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  F Dubrulle; R Souillard; R Hermans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 7.034

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging.

Authors:  Rui Guo; Yan-Ping Mao; Ling-Long Tang; Lei Chen; Ying Sun; Jun Ma
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Differences in extension patterns between adenoid cystic carcinoma of the nasopharynx and nasopharyngeal carcinoma on MRI.

Authors:  Jun Dong; Li Tian; Sheng Li; Yunxian Mo; Lizhi Liu; Rui Zhong
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-12-01

3.  Retreatment in locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Current status and perspectives.

Authors:  Sharon Shuxian Poh; Yoke Lim Soong; Kiattisa Sommat; Chwee Ming Lim; Kam Weng Fong; Terence Wk Tan; Melvin Lk Chua; Fu Qiang Wang; Jing Hu; Joseph Ts Wee
Journal:  Cancer Commun (Lond)       Date:  2021-05-06

4.  Prognostic value of MRI-derived masticator space involvement in IMRT-treated nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Youping Xiao; Jianji Pan; Yunbin Chen; Shaojun Lin; Ying Chen; Jingfeng Zong; Yanhong Fang; Qiaojuan Guo; Bijuan Chen; Linbo Tang
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  A comparison between the sixth and seventh editions of the UICC/AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a Chinese cohort.

Authors:  Jing Li; Xiong Zou; Yun-Long Wu; Jing-Cui Guo; Jing-Ping Yun; Miao Xu; Qi-Sheng Feng; Li-Zhen Chen; Jin-Xin Bei; Yi-Xin Zeng; Ming-Yuan Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Investigation of the feasibility of elective irradiation to neck level Ib using intensity-modulated radiotherapy for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Yi-Kan Cheng; Wen-Fei Li; Rui Guo; Lei Chen; Ying Sun; Yan-Ping Mao; Guan-Qun Zhou; Xu Liu; Li-Zhi Liu; Ai-Hua Lin; Ling-Long Tang; Jun Ma
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Prognostic value of parotid lymph node metastasis in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yuan Zhang; Wen-Fei Li; Lei Chen; Yan-Ping Mao; Rui Guo; Fan Zhang; Hao Peng; Li-Zhi Liu; Li Li; Qing Liu; Jun Ma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Radiation-induced temporal lobe injury for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy.

Authors:  Guan-Qun Zhou; Xiao-Li Yu; Mo Chen; Rui Guo; Ying Lei; Ying Sun; Yan-Ping Mao; Li-Zhi Liu; Li Li; Ai-Hua Lin; Jun Ma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Radiation-induced temporal lobe injury after intensity modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a dose-volume-outcome analysis.

Authors:  Ying Sun; Guan-Qun Zhou; Zhen-Yu Qi; Li Zhang; Shao-Min Huang; Li-Zhi Liu; Li Li; Ai-Hua Lin; Jun Ma
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Comparison of radiological and clinical features of temporal lobe necrosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with 2D radiotherapy or intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Y-P Mao; G-Q Zhou; L-Z Liu; R Guo; Y Sun; L Li; A-H Lin; M-S Zeng; T-B Kang; W-H Jia; J-Y Shao; H-Q Mai; J Ma
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.