| Literature DB >> 26345410 |
Yuan Zhang1, Wen-Fei Li1, Lei Chen1, Yan-Ping Mao1, Rui Guo1, Fan Zhang1, Hao Peng1, Li-Zhi Liu2, Li Li2, Qing Liu3, Jun Ma1.
Abstract
The prognostic value and staging category of parotid lymph node (PLN) metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) remain unknown. We retrospectively reviewed MRI scans and medical records for 1811 NPC patients who received intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The diagnosis of PLN metastasis was mainly based on MRI follow-up. Twenty-five positive PLNs in 21/1811 patients were identified; the incidence of PLN metastasis was 1.2%. PLN metastasis was significantly associated with advanced N-category and stage. Ten of the 21 patients received irradiation of the involved PLNs; the PLN recurrence rate was significantly higher for patients who received no irradiation; thus only patients with irradiated PLN were included in prognostic analyses. PLN metastasis was associated with significantly poorer progression-free survival, overall survival and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), but not regional or local relapse-free survival, in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, PLN metastasis was also significantly associated with poor DMFS. PLN involvement had a significantly higher hazard ratio (HR) for distant failure than N2 disease and similar HR to N3 disease. In conclusion, PLN metastasis is rare in NPC and was associated with similarly poor DMFS as N3 disease. PLN metastasis should be suspected in advanced nodal disease, but diagnosed with care before administering aggressive treatment.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26345410 PMCID: PMC4561956 DOI: 10.1038/srep13919
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Clinicopathological characteristics of 1811 patients with NPC stratified by the presence or absence of parotid lymph node metastasis.
| Characteristic | No. of 1790 patients (%) without PLN | No. of 21 patients (%) with PLN | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.24 | |||
| Male | 1333 (74.5%) | 18 (85.7%) | |
| Female | 457 (25.5%) | 3 (14.3%) | |
| 0.07 | |||
| ≤45 | 948 (53%) | 7 (33.3%) | |
| >45 | 842 (47%) | 14 (66.7%) | |
| 0.73 | |||
| WHO type I | 10 (0.6%) | 0 (0%) | |
| WHO type II/III | 1780 (99.4%) | 21 (100%) | |
| 0.06 | |||
| No | 259 (14.4%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Yes | 1531 (85.6%) | 21 (100%) | |
| 0.62 | |||
| T1 | 323 (18%) | 3 (14.3%) | |
| T2 | 278 (15.5%) | 5 (23.8%) | |
| T3 | 857 (47.9%) | 8 (38.1%) | |
| T4 | 332 (18.5%) | 5 (23.8%) | |
| <0.01 | |||
| N0 | 308 (17.2%) | 0 (0%) | |
| N1 | 1056 (59%) | 6 (28.6%) | |
| N2 | 271 (15.1%) | 5 (23.8%) | |
| N3a | 30 (1.7%) | 2 (9.5%) | |
| N3b | 125 (7%) | 8 (38.1%) | |
| <0.01 | |||
| I | 99 (5.5%) | 0 (0%) | |
| II | 381 (21.3%) | 1 (4.8%) | |
| III | 851 (47.5%) | 6 (28.6%) | |
| IVa | 304 (17%) | 4 (19%) | |
| IVb | 155 (8.7%) | 10 (47.6%) |
Figure 1Flowchart illustrating the identification of positive parotid lymph nodes.
Figure 2Imaging of parotid lymph node involvement in the right parotid gland in a 29-year-old male with NPC.
(A) Pretreatment transverse T1-weighted spin-echo MRI image showing a 10 mm nonspecific hypointense nodule within the right parotid gland. (B) Isodose curves for intensity-modulated radiotherapy: red, 70 Gy; green, 60 Gy; light blue, 45 Gy; blue 23 Gy. (C) Transverse T1-weighted spin-echo MRI image 3 months after radiotherapy showing the lesion within the right parotid gland was controlled. (D) Transverse T1-weighted spin-echo MRI image 32 months after radiotherapy showing a 12 mm nonspecific hypointense nodule within the right parotid gland, which was pathologically confirmed as squamous carcinoma after surgery.
Summary of multivariate analysis of different prognostic factors in 1800 patients with NPC.
| Endpoint | Factor | HR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Progression | Age > vs. ≤45 yrs | 1.25 | 0.99–1.58 | 0.06 |
| or death | Sex female vs. male | 1.00 | 0.76–1.31 | 0.99 |
| Chemotherapy yes vs. no | 0.94 | 0.63–1.41 | 0.76 | |
| AJCC T-category T3–4 vs. T1–2 | 1.71 | 1.30–2.24 | <0.01 | |
| AJCC N-category N2–3 vs. N0–1 | 2.19 | 1.72–2.78 | <0.01 | |
| PLN metastasis yes vs. no | 1.92 | 0.71–5.21 | 0.20 | |
| Death | Age > vs. ≤45 yrs | 1.48 | 1.03–2.12 | 0.04 |
| Sex female vs. male | 0.85 | 0.55–1.31 | 0.46 | |
| Chemotherapy yes vs. no | 0.70 | 0.37–1.31 | 0.26 | |
| AJCC T-category T3–4 vs. T1–2 | 2.77 | 1.74–4.42 | <0.01 | |
| AJCC N-category N2–3 vs. N0–1 | 3.58 | 2.48–5.17 | <0.01 | |
| PLN metastasis yes vs. no | 2.48 | 0.78–7.91 | 0.13 | |
| Distant failure | Age > vs. ≤45 yrs | 1.09 | 0.81–1.48 | 0.57 |
| Sex female vs. male | 0.75 | 0.51–1.09 | 0.13 | |
| Chemotherapy yes vs. no | 1.14 | 0.64–2.04 | 0.65 | |
| AJCC T-category T3–4 vs. T1–2 | 1.78 | 1.25–2.52 | <0.01 | |
| AJCC N-category N2–3 vs. N0–1 | 2.74 | 2.01–3.73 | <0.01 | |
| PLN metastasis yes vs. no | 3.15 | 1.16–8.60 | 0.03 | |
| Regional | Age >vs. ≤45 yrs | 0.87 | 0.52–1.46 | 0.60 |
| failure | Sex female vs. male | 1.70 | 1.01–2.87 | 0.05 |
| Chemotherapy yes vs. no | 0.80 | 0.36–1.80 | 0.59 | |
| AJCC T-category T3–4 vs. T1–2 | 1.16 | 0.67–2.01 | 0.59 | |
| AJCC N-category N2–3 vs. N0–1 | 1.92 | 1.15–3.19 | 0.01 | |
| PLN metastasis yes vs. no | 2.72 | 0.37–20.00 | 0.33 |
Abbreviations: HR = hazard ratio; CI = confidence interval; PLN = parotid lymph nodes. The 11 patients whose involved parotid lymph nodes were not irradiated were excluded from this analysis.
Figure 3(A) Progression-free survival, (B) overall survival, (C) distant metastasis-free survival and (D) regional relapse-free survival curves for patients with NPC stratified by N-category (as defined by the 7th UICC/AJCC system) and parotid lymph node (PLN) involvement. The 11 patients whose involved PLNs were not irradiated were excluded.
Hazard consistency for different nodal subgroups in 1800 patients with NPC.
| Endpoint | Category | HR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Progression | N0 | 0.36 | 0.23–0.57 | <0.01 |
| or death | N1 | 0.54 | 0.40–0.73 | <0.01 |
| N2 | 1 | |||
| N3 | 1.48 | 1.01–2.16 | 0.04 | |
| PLN metastasis | 1.89 | 0.68–5.20 | 0.22 | |
| Death | N0 | 0.32 | 0.16–0.66 | <0.01 |
| N1 | 0.34 | 0.22–0.54 | <0.01 | |
| N2 | 1 | |||
| N3 | 1.98 | 1.20–3.26 | <0.01 | |
| PLN metastasis | 2.57 | 0.78–8.46 | 0.12 | |
| Distant failure | N0 | 0.30 | 0.16–0.55 | <0.01 |
| N1 | 0.43 | 0.30–0.63 | <0.01 | |
| N2 | 1 | |||
| N3 | 1.61 | 1.02–2.53 | 0.04 | |
| PLN metastasis | 3.13 | 1.12–8.73 | 0.03 | |
| Regional failure | N0 | 0.11 | 0.03–0.48 | <0.01 |
| N1 | 0.55 | 0.30–1.01 | 0.05 | |
| N2 | 1 | |||
| N3 | 0.85 | 0.35–2.10 | 0.73 | |
| PLN metastasis | 2.15 | 0.28–16.33 | 0.46 |
Abbreviations: HR = hazard ratio; CI = confidence interval; PLN = parotid lymph node. Adjusted for age (> vs. ≤45 yrs), sex (female vs. male), T-category (T3–4 vs. T1–2) and chemotherapy (yes vs. no). The 11 patients whose involved parotid lymph nodes were not irradiated were excluded from this analysis.