Literature DB >> 21720727

Factors affecting the accurate placement of percutaneous pedicle screws during minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Moon-Chan Kim1, Hung-Tae Chung, Jae-Lim Cho, Dong-Jun Kim, Nam-Su Chung.   

Abstract

We retrospectively evaluated 488 percutaneous pedicle screws in 110 consecutive patients that had undergone minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF) to determine the incidence of pedicle screw misplacement and its relevant risk factors. Screw placements were classified based on postoperative computed tomographic findings as "correct", "cortical encroachment" or as "frank penetration". Age, gender, body mass index, bone mineral density, diagnosis, operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL), level of fusion, surgeon's position, spinal alignment, quality/quantity of multifidus muscle, and depth to screw entry point were considered to be demographic and anatomical variables capable of affecting pedicle screw placement. Pedicle dimensions, facet joint arthritis, screw location (ipsilateral or contralateral), screw length, screw diameter, and screw trajectory angle were regarded as screw-related variables. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine relations between these variables and the correctness of screw placement. The incidence of cortical encroachment was 12.5% (61 screws), and frank penetration was found for 54 (11.1%) screws. Two patients (0.4%) with medial penetration underwent revision for unbearable radicular pain and foot drop, respectively. The odds ratios of significant risk factors for pedicle screw misplacement were 3.373 (95% CI 1.095-10.391) for obesity, 1.141 (95% CI 1.024-1.271) for pedicle convergent angle, 1.013 (95% CI 1.006-1.065) for EBL >400 cc, and 1.003 (95% CI 1.000-1.006) for cross-sectional area of multifidus muscle. Although percutaneous insertion of pedicle screws was performed safely during MITLIF, several risk factors should be considered to improve placement accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21720727      PMCID: PMC3175862          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1892-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  25 in total

1.  Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  T Laine; T Lund; M Ylikoski; J Lohikoski; D Schlenzka
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Correlation between the MRI changes in the lumbar multifidus muscles and leg pain.

Authors:  D F Kader; D Wardlaw; F W Smith
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 3.  Complications in spinal deformity surgery: issues unrelated directly to intraoperative technical skills.

Authors:  Allen Carl; Erin Kaufman; James Lawrence
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Victor Kosmopoulos; Constantin Schizas
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  An anatomical study of the mid-lateral pars relative to the pedicle footprint in the lower lumbar spine.

Authors:  Brian W Su; Paul D Kim; Thomas D Cha; Joseph Lee; Ernest W April; Mark Weidenbaum; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Percutaneous techniques for minimally invasive posterior lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Eric B Harris; Patrick Massey; James Lawrence; Jeffrey Rihn; Alex Vaccaro; D Greg Anderson
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.047

7.  Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine.

Authors:  L P Amiot; K Lang; M Putzier; H Zippel; H Labelle
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Obesity and spine surgery: relation to perioperative complications.

Authors:  Nimesh Patel; Bradley Bagan; Sumeet Vadera; Mitchell Gil Maltenfort; Harel Deutsch; Alexander R Vaccaro; James Harrop; Ashwini Sharan; John K Ratliff
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2007-04

9.  The impact of minimally invasive spine surgery on perioperative complications in overweight or obese patients.

Authors:  Paul Park; Cheerag Upadhyaya; Hugh J L Garton; Kevin T Foley
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Obesity and self-reported outcome after minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion surgery.

Authors:  David S Rosen; Sherise D Ferguson; Alfred T Ogden; Dezheng Huo; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  30 in total

1.  Fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw accuracy with a mini-open approach: a tomographic evaluation of 470 screws in 125 patients.

Authors:  José Antonio Soriano-Sánchez; Luis Alberto Ortega-Porcayo; Carlos Francisco Gutiérrez-Partida; Luis Rodolfo Ramírez-Barrios; Ramses Uriel Ortíz-Leyva; Manuel Rodríguez-García; Oscar Sánchez-Escandón
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-10-23

2.  Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring for minimally invasive 1- and 2-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: does it improve patient outcome?

Authors:  Juanita Garces; J Franklin Berry; Edison P Valle-Giler; Wale A R Sulaiman
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

Review 3.  The evolution of image-guided lumbosacral spine surgery.

Authors:  Austin C Bourgeois; Austin R Faulkner; Alexander S Pasciak; Yong C Bradley
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-04

Review 4.  Multilevel mini-open TLIFs and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation: description of a simple technical nuance used to increase intraoperative safety and improve workflow. Tips and tricks and review of the literature.

Authors:  Giuseppe M V Barbagallo; Francesco Certo; Massimiliano Visocchi; Giovanni Sciacca; Mario Piccini; Vincenzo Albanese
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Percutaneous stabilization of a T12 and L5 fracture.

Authors:  Matti Scholz; Kristina Liebig; Frank Kandziora
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Percutaneous pedicle screw placements: accuracy and rates of cranial facet joint violation using conventional fluoroscopy compared with intraoperative three-dimensional computed tomography computer navigation.

Authors:  Tetsuro Ohba; Shigeto Ebata; Koji Fujita; Hironao Sato; Hirotaka Haro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Methods to determine pedicle screw placement accuracy in spine surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ahmed A Aoude; Maryse Fortin; Rainer Figueiredo; Peter Jarzem; Jean Ouellet; Michael H Weber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  A new method to precisely control the depth of percutaneous screws into the pedicle by counting the rotation number of the screw with low radiation exposure: technical note.

Authors:  Xu Li; Feng Zhang; Wenzhi Zhang; Xifu Shang; Jintao Han; Pengfei Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Comparison of superior-level facet joint violations during open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  Ranjith Babu; Jong G Park; Ankit I Mehta; Tony Shan; Peter M Grossi; Christopher R Brown; William J Richardson; Robert E Isaacs; Carlos A Bagley; Maragatha Kuchibhatla; Oren N Gottfried
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Accuracy of patient-specific template-guided vs. free-hand fluoroscopically controlled pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbar spine: a randomized cadaveric study.

Authors:  Mazda Farshad; Michael Betz; Nadja A Farshad-Amacker; Manuel Moser
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.