Literature DB >> 22842986

The consequences of Lactobacillus vini and Dekkera bruxellensis as contaminants of the sugarcane-based ethanol fermentation.

Rafael Barros de Souza1, Billy Manoel dos Santos, Raquel de Fátima Rodrigues de Souza, Paula Katharina Nogueira da Silva, Brígida Thais Luckwu Lucena, Marcos Antonio de Morais.   

Abstract

This work describes the effects of the presence of the yeast Dekkera bruxellensis and the bacterium Lactobacillus vini on the industrial production of ethanol from sugarcane fermentation. Both contaminants were quantified in industrial samples, and their presence was correlated to a decrease in ethanol concentration and accumulation of sugar. Then, laboratory mixed-cell fermentations were carried out to evaluate the effects of these presumed contaminants on the viability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the overall ethanol yield. The results showed that high residual sugar seemed the most significant factor arising from the presence of D. bruxellensis in the industrial process when compared to pure S. cerevisiae cultures. Moreover, when L. vini was added to S. cerevisiae cultures it did not appear to affect the yeast cells by any kind of antagonistic effect under stable fermentations. In addition, when L. vini was added to D. bruxellensis cultures, it showed signs of being able to stimulate the fermentative activity of the yeast cells in a way that led to an increase in the ethanol yield.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22842986     DOI: 10.1007/s10295-012-1167-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1367-5435            Impact factor:   3.346


  15 in total

1.  Identification of Dekkera bruxellensis as a major contaminant yeast in continuous fuel ethanol fermentation.

Authors:  A T de Souza Liberal; A C M Basílio; A do Monte Resende; B T V Brasileiro; E A da Silva-Filho; J O F de Morais; D A Simões; M A de Morais
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.772

2.  Changes in steady state on introduction of a Lactobacillus contaminant to a continuous culture ethanol fermentation.

Authors:  D Bayrock; W M Ingledew
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.346

3.  Yeast population dynamics of industrial fuel-ethanol fermentation process assessed by PCR-fingerprinting.

Authors:  Eurípedes Alves da Silva-Filho; Scheila Karina Brito dos Santos; Alecsandra do Monte Resende; José Otamar Falcão de Morais; Marcos Antonio de Morais; Diogo Ardaillon Simões
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.271

4.  The ability to use nitrate confers advantage to Dekkera bruxellensis over S. cerevisiae and can explain its adaptation to industrial fermentation processes.

Authors:  Will de Barros Pita; Fernanda Cristina Bezerra Leite; Anna Theresa de Souza Liberal; Diogo Ardaillon Simões; Marcos Antonio de Morais
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 2.271

5.  Effect of lactobacilli on yeast growth, viability and batch and semi-continuous alcoholic fermentation of corn mash.

Authors:  K C Thomas; S H Hynes; W M Ingledew
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.772

6.  Bacterial contaminants of fuel ethanol production.

Authors:  Kelly A Skinner; Timothy D Leathers
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-08-28       Impact factor: 3.346

7.  Dekkera bruxellensis and Lactobacillus vini form a stable ethanol-producing consortium in a commercial alcohol production process.

Authors:  Volkmar Passoth; Johanna Blomqvist; Johan Schnürer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Effects of lactobacilli on yeast-catalyzed ethanol fermentations.

Authors:  N V Narendranath; S H Hynes; K C Thomas; W M Ingledew
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Evaluation of bacterial contamination in a fed-batch alcoholic fermentation process.

Authors:  P de Oliva-Neto; F Yokoya
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Lactobacillus vini sp. nov., a wine lactic acid bacterium homofermentative for pentoses.

Authors:  Ana María Rodas; Empar Chenoll; M Carmen Macián; Sergi Ferrer; Isabel Pardo; Rosa Aznar
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.747

View more
  4 in total

1.  Genome-resolved metagenomics of sugarcane vinasse bacteria.

Authors:  Noriko A Cassman; Késia S Lourenço; Janaína B do Carmo; Heitor Cantarella; Eiko E Kuramae
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 6.040

2.  Brettanomyces bruxellensis population survey reveals a diploid-triploid complex structured according to substrate of isolation and geographical distribution.

Authors:  Marta Avramova; Alice Cibrario; Emilien Peltier; Monika Coton; Emmanuel Coton; Joseph Schacherer; Giuseppe Spano; Vittorio Capozzi; Giuseppe Blaiotta; Franck Salin; Marguerite Dols-Lafargue; Paul Grbin; Chris Curtin; Warren Albertin; Isabelle Masneuf-Pomarede
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Interaction of Lactobacillus vini with the ethanol-producing yeasts Dekkera bruxellensis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Ievgeniia Tiukova; Thomas Eberhard; Volkmar Passoth
Journal:  Biotechnol Appl Biochem       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.431

4.  Effects of feedstock and co-culture of Lactobacillus fermentum and wild Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain during fuel ethanol fermentation by the industrial yeast strain PE-2.

Authors:  Vanda R Reis; Ana Paula G Bassi; Bianca C Cerri; Amanda R Almeida; Isis G B Carvalho; Reinaldo G Bastos; Sandra R Ceccato-Antonini
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 3.298

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.